Dear reader of, please excuse the disruption. needs about $63500 in 2024. In 2023 we received donations of about $ 32200. Unfortunately, 99.8% of our readers do not donate. If everyone who reads this request makes a small contribution, our fundraising campaign for 2024 would be over after a few days. This donation request is displayed 23,000 times a week, but only 75 people donate. If you find useful, please take a minute and support with your donation. Thank you!

Since 01.06.2021 is supported by the non-profit ADxS e.V..

$21963 of $63500 - as of 2024-05-31
Header Image
3. Interactions of the dopaminergic brain areas


3. Interactions of the dopaminergic brain areas

The nucleus accumbens (part of the striatum) plays a central role in the conversion of emotional information into motor actions. It is modulated by the prefrontal cortex (PFC), which in turn receives information from sensory and limbic areas of the brain. The PFC influences dopaminergic and cholinergic neurons in various brain regions that regulate the activity of the nucleus accumbens and other limbic brain areas. The activity of the nucleus accumbens is also influenced by the amygdala and the hippocampus, which send emotional and contextual information to the nucleus accumbens, respectively. There is an interaction between the PFC and subcortical regions (including the striatum) in which a high dopamine level in the PFC correlates with a low dopamine level in subcortical regions and vice versa.
A loss of dopaminergic activity in the PFC leads to increased activity in the nucleus accumbens and can lead to behavioral deficits.
There is also an interaction between the hippocampus, the PFC and the nucleus accumbens, in which the respective activity ratio regulates the activity of the nucleus accumbens. Finally, dopamine plays a role in the functional connectivity between different brain regions.

3. Interactions of the dopaminergic brain areas

3.1. Nucleus accumbens as the control center between emotion and action

The nucleus accumbens (part of the striatum) is the central control center for the “translation” of limbic information into motor responses.

The PFC receives information from the sensory and limbic areas of the brain and in turn projects it to the nucleus accumbens, thereby promoting goal-oriented action.
The medial part of the PFC (mPFC) modulates dopaminergic and cholinergic neurons in the brainstem, basal forebrain and septum, which send information to the nucleus accumbens as well as the amygdala and hippocampus in the limbic system, thereby influencing their activity. The amygdala sends emotional information glutamatergically to the nucleus accumbens, the hippocampus sends contextual information glutamatergically to the nucleus accumbens.

The PFC thus controls cognitive and executive processes that are based on motivation, emotion, learning or memory.123

3.2. The dopamine seesaw between PFC and subcortical regions (e.g. striatum)

High dopamine levels in the PFC cause reduced dopamine levels in subcortical regions and vice versa.

The PFC is glutamatergically activated by the amygdala and hippocampus in relation to the assessment of a situation for its danger potential. Glutamatergic efferents from the mPFC influence the tonic release of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens via presynaptic contacts on dopaminergic nerve endings.
The basolateral amygdala is informed dopaminergically by the PFC about its stress reactions, whereby the amygdala is also addressed dopaminergically by the VTA in a stress-dependent manner.4
The mPFC projects directly and indirectly via the pedunculopotine tegmental nucleus into the ventral tegmentum (VTA), which is the main source of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens.15

Loss of excitatory influence on dopaminergic neurons of the VTA appears to reduce tonic dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens, which in turn leads to sensitization of subcortical dopamine receptors (upregulation). Lesions of the medial PFC - regardless of age - increase subcortical dopaminergic activity, especially in the nucleus accumbens in the striatum, which causes biochemical changes as well as behavioral deficits.6789
It probably depends on which side of the brain the lesion occurs. The dopaminergic activity of subcortical regions apparently depends on the dopamine level in the mPFC in both cerebral hemispheres. Uncontrollable stress increased dopamine especially in the right cortex. Dopamine deficiency in the left or right PFC, mPFC or ACC increased susceptibility to stress. One study found increased stress-induced gastric ulcer formation due to chronic cold stress in rats.10

  • Dopamine deficiency

    • In the right cortex caused10
      • Dopamine levels in the striatum reduced on both sides (in rats)
    • In the left cortex caused10
      • Dopamine turnover in the amygdala increased on both sides (in rats)
    • On both sides of the cortex (in rats)10
      • Dopamine levels in the right nucleus accumbens reduced
      • Increased dopamine turnover in the left nucleus accumbens
      • Dopamine turnover in the right amygdala reduced
      • Increased dopamine levels in the left amygdala
    • In the mPFC caused
      • Increased release of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens11
    • In the PFC caused
      • Even mild stress increases dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens; this increases cortisol levels12(bei neugeborenen Ratten)
    • In the PFC caused
      • Increased amphetamine sensitivity due to increased dopamine sensitivity, which probably results from an increased density of dopamine D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens.13(bei Ratten)
  • Dopamine release

    • In the PFC causes
      • Reduced dopamine levels in subcortical regions.14
      • Reduced dopamine levels in the striatum14(Rhesusaffen, DA-Stimulation durch Amphetamin)

Oxygen-deprived rats born by caesarean section showed an increased dopaminergic response in the nucleus accumbens, hyperactivity and increased dopamine transporter density in the right PFC. D1 and D2 receptors were unchanged. Under chronic stress, there was also a dopamine deficiency in the right PFC.15

Carriers of the COMT Val/Val polymorphism, which synthesizes more COMT in the PFC, leading to faster dopamine degradation, i.e. lower dopamine levels in the PFC, showed lower tonic and increased phasic dopamine levels in subcortical brain regions.16

There appears to be a kind of “dopamine seesaw” between the PFC and the striatum - at least in healthy people. Low dopamine in the PFC is said to correlate with high dopamine in the striatum and vice versa.
That a mesocortical dopamine deficit leads to a subcortical (mesolimbic) dopamine excess,1718 is consistent with much evidence that mesocortical dopamine exerts a tonic inhibitory influence on subcortical dopamine,1920 21 22 23 24 25 also in the caudate nucleus (in rhesus monkeys and rats).26

However, it is also possible that these are merely temporal differences in an increase, as a study conducted 15 years later found that an amphetamine-induced increase in dopamine in the PFC lasted significantly longer than the increase in the caudate nucleus.27 It is also conceivable that the results found by PET do not match those induced by environmental influences.28

MPFC stimulation appears to induce phasic dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens, with frequency and duration of mPFC stimulation modulating dopamine release in the NAc. Increasing the frequency of direct stimulation of the MFB from 10 - 60 Hz caused an increase in dopamine release.
Increasing the frequency of MFB stimulation increased extracellular dopamine in the NAc, as the rate of stimulated release outpaced uptake kinetics.2930 In another study, dopamine release in the NAc reached its maximum31

  • with an mPFC stimulation duration of 5 s and more at 10 to 20 Hz
  • with an mPFC stimulation duration of less than 5 s at high frequencies such as 60 Hz

3.3. The dopaminergic interaction of the nucleus accumbens, hippocampus and mPFC

A more detailed description of the following presentation can be found in Klein.32

The nucleus accumbens is addressed by the mPFC and the hippocampus. Whether a long-term strengthening of the responses of the nucleus accumbens to stimuli from the PFC or the hippocampus takes place (neurological correlate: long-term potentiation, learning effects) depends on other dopamine levels.
Stimuli from the hippocampus enhanced learning processes in the nucleus accumbens when D1 agonists (stimulating) were given, while D1 antagonists (inhibiting) blocked long-term potentiation.3334
Stimuli from the mPFC enhanced learning processes in the nucleus accumbens when D2 antagonists (inhibitory) were administered, while D1 agonists (stimulatory) blocked long-term potentiation.3334
This leads to the following hypothesis by Goto and Grace:

3.3.1. Activity ratio of hippocampus to mPFC regulates activity of the nucleus accumbens Hippocampus more active than mPFC: nucleus accumbens active

If the hippocampus is more active than the mPFC, the hippocampus transmits to the mPFC.
The consequences are:

  • Nucleus accumbens has increased activity
    • Because the hippocampus and mPFC are active at the same time
    • Total increase in dopamine in the nucleus accumbens
    • Activation of dopaminergic D1 receptors in the nucleus accumbens
      • Due to inhibition of inhibitory connections from the ventral pallidum to the VTA
      • With simultaneous phasic dopamine release,
        • E.g. by excitatory signals from the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus, which is also innervated by the mPFC
        • D1 receptor stimulation increases calcium influx during NMDA receptor activity
        • Thereby long-term potentiation of the hippocampal inputs.
      • Simultaneous D2 receptor-dependent long-term depression of the prefrontal inputs
        • Probably through various 2nd messenger systems34
          • E.g. the NMDA receptor-induced synthesis of NO MPFC more active than hippocampus: nucleus accumbens inhibited

If the mPFC is more active than the hippocampus, the mPFC transmits to the hippocampus.
The consequences are:

  • Activity of the nucleus accumbens is inhibited
    • Inhibitory projections of the nucleus accumbens
    • Disinhibition of the ventral pallidum
      • Thereby inhibitory projections of the ventral pallidum to the VTA
      • Resulting in reduced tonic dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens
    • Presynaptic D2 receptor activity is reduced
    • Signals from the mPFC to the nucleus accumbens are amplified
    • This results in long-term potentiation of the mPFC inputs34

The long-term potentiation of the inputs to the nucleus accumbens from the hippocampus as well as from the PFC can be reversed by electrical stimulation of nerve fibers with a high repetition frequency (which causes activation) of the respective other region.34

3.4. Interaction locus coeruleus and midbrain

In anesthetized rats, stimulation of the locus coeruleus with a single pulse led to excitation, which was followed by inhibition of the electrical activity of individual dopamine neurons in the midbrain (VTA, substantia nigra). Burst stimulation caused a longer-lasting inhibition. Reserpine suppressed this response, indicating a noradrenergically mediated response.35

3.5. Dopamine and functional connectivity

Dopamine appears to specifically influence the functional connectivity of certain brain regions. According to one study, amisulpride (a D2/D3 antagonist) increased functional connectivity from the putamen to the precuneus and from the ventral striatum to the precentral gyrus. L-DOPA (a dopamine precursor) increased functional connectivity from the ventral tegmentum to the insula and operculum and between the ventral striatum and vlPFC and decreased functional connectivity between the ventral striatum and dorsal caudate with the mPFC.36

3.6. Dopamine elements in different areas of the brain

PFC Striatum (caudate nucleus, putamen) Nucleus accumbens Prelimbic regions Amygdala ACC Posterior parietal cortex Hippo-campus VTA Substantia nigra
Function related to ADHD Inhibition, executive functions (dlPFC) Motor control, motivation
transmits (afference) / receives (efference) DA transmits and receives DA receives DA receives DA receives DA transmits to striatum (caudate nucleus and putamen)
DAT (fmol/mg)37 rare frequent (154) frequent (54.8; authors speak of fmol/g; this seems to be an oversight) (12.3) frequent (dentate gyrus) (5.3) present in VTA lateral, hardly ever in VTA medial 38 frequent; DAT also causes DA release, postsynaptically, when DA levels are very low3937
NET (fmol/mg)37 medium, can reabsorb DA (16.2) very low (3.4) high proportion of DA degradation (19.5) high proportion of DA degradation (16)
extracellular DA low low
DA vesicles little much
COMT high low
D1 receptor (activating) frequent frequent
D5 receptor (activating) rare rare
D2 receptor (inhibitory) rare frequent
D3 receptor (inhibitory) rare frequent
D4 receptor (inhibitory) frequent; here more sensitive to NE than to DA.40 rare

DA = dopamine; NE = noradrenaline

  1. Del Arco, Mora (2009): Neurotransmitters and prefrontal cortex-limbic system interactions: implications for plasticity and psychiatric disorders. J. Neural. Transm. 116: 941-952

  2. Klein (2010): Effekte von Enriched Environment auf strukturelle Veränderungen und Verhaltensdefizite nach neonatalen Läsionen des medialen präfrontalen Cortex bei Ratten; Dissertation, Seite 71

  3. Arnsten, Bao-Ming (2005): Neurobiology of Executive Functions: Catecholamine Influences on Prefrontal Cortical Functions; Advancing the neuroscience of ADHD; Biological Psychiatry, Volume 57, Issue 11, 1 June 2005, Pages 1377-1384

  4. Steckler, Kalin, Reul (2005): Handbook of Stress and the Brain, Teil 1; Elsevier, Seite 807 f

  5. Klein (2010): Effekte von Enriched Environment auf strukturelle Veränderungen und Verhaltensdefizite nach neonatalen Läsionen des medialen präfrontalen Cortex bei Ratten; Dissertation, Seite 71 mit weiteren Nachweisen

  6. Bennay, Gernert, Schwabe, Enkel, Koch (2004): Neonatal medial prefrontal cortex lesion enhances the sensitivity of the mesoaccumbal dopamine system. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19: 3277–3290. doi:10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03442.x

  7. Brake, Flores, Francis, Meaney, Srivastava, Gratton (2000): Enhanced nucleus accumbens dopamine and plasma corticosterone stress responses in adult rats with neonatal excitotoxic lesions to the medial prefrontal cortex; Neuroscience, Volume 96, Issue 4, March 2000, Pages 687-695

  8. Flores, Wood, Liang, Quirion, Srivastava (1996): Enhanced amphetamine sensitivity and increased expression of dopamine D2 receptors in postpubertal rats after neonatal excitotoxic lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 1996 Nov 15;16(22):7366-75.

  9. Jaskiw, Karoum, Freed, Phillips, Kleinman, Weinberger (1990): Effect of ibotenic acid lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex on amphetamine-induced locomotion and regional brain catecholamine concentrations in the rat; Brain Research; Volume 534, Issues 1–2, 26 November 1990, Pages 263-272;

  10. Sullivan, Szechtman (1995): Asymmetrical influence of mesocortical dopamine depletion on stress ulcer development and subcortical dopamine systems in rats: implications for psychopathology. Neuroscience. 1995 Apr;65(3):757-66.

  11. Thompson, Moss (1995): In vivo stimulated dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens: modulation by the prefrontal cortex. Brain Res. 1995 Jul 17;686(1):93-8.

  12. Klein (2010): Effekte von Enriched Environment auf strukturelle Veränderungen und Verhaltensdefizite nach neonatalen Läsionen des medialen präfrontalen Cortex bei Ratten; Dissertation, Seite 71 mit Verweis auf Brake et al. (2000).

  13. Klein (2010): Effekte von Enriched Environment auf strukturelle Veränderungen und Verhaltensdefizite nach neonatalen Läsionen des medialen präfrontalen Cortex bei Ratten; Dissertation, Seite 71 mit Verweis auf Flores et al. (1996) und Bennay et al. (2004).

  14. Heinz (2000): Das dopaminerge Verstärkungssystem, Seite 106

  15. Brake, Sullivan, Gratton (2000): Perinatal Distress Leads to Lateralized Medial Prefrontal Cortical Dopamine Hypofunction in Adult Rats; Journal of Neuroscience 15 July 2000, 20 (14) 5538-5543

  16. de Frias, Marklund, Eriksson, Larsson, Oman, Annerbrink, Bäckman, Nilsson, Nyberg (2010): Influence of COMT gene polymorphism on fMRI-assessed sustained and transient activity during a working memory task. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jul;22(7):1614-22. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21318.

  17. Brake, Boksa, Gratton (1997): Effects of perinatal anoxia on the acute locomotor response to repeated amphetamine administration in adult rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1997 Oct;133(4):389-95. doi: 10.1007/s002130050419. PMID: 9372540.

  18. Brake, Noel, Boksa, Gratton (1997): Influence of perinatal factors on the nucleus accumbens dopamine response to repeated stress during adulthood: an electrochemical study in the rat. Neuroscience. 1997 Apr;77(4):1067-76. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(96)00543-x. PMID: 9130788.

  19. Carr, O’Donnell, Card, Sesack (1999): Dopamine terminals in the rat prefrontal cortex synapse on pyramidal cells that project to the nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci. 1999 Dec 15;19(24):11049-60. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-24-11049.1999. PMID: 10594085; PMCID: PMC6784921.

  20. Doherty, Gratton (1996): Medial prefrontal cortical D1 receptor modulation of the meso-accumbens dopamine response to stress: an electrochemical study in freely-behaving rats. Brain Res. 1996 Apr 9;715(1-2):86-97. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)01557-4. PMID: 8739626.

  21. Banks, Gratton (1995): Possible involvement of medial prefrontal cortex in amphetamine-induced sensitization of mesolimbic dopamine function. Eur J Pharmacol. 1995 Aug 25;282(1-3):157-67. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(95)00306-6. PMID: 7498271.

  22. Mitchell, Gratton (1992): Partial dopamine depletion of the prefrontal cortex leads to enhanced mesolimbic dopamine release elicited by repeated exposure to naturally reinforcing stimuli. J Neurosci. 1992 Sep;12(9):3609-18. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-09-03609.1992. PMID: 1527600; PMCID: PMC6575745.

  23. Rosin, Clark, Goldstein, Roth, Deutch (1992): Effects of 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the prefrontal cortex on tyrosine hydroxylase activity in mesolimbic and nigrostriatal dopamine systems. Neuroscience. 1992 Jun;48(4):831-9. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90271-3. PMID: 1352864.

  24. Deutch (1992): The regulation of subcortical dopamine systems by the prefrontal cortex: interactions of central dopamine systems and the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. J Neural Transm Suppl. 1992;36:61-89. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9211-5_5. PMID: 1527521.

  25. Pycock, Carter, Kerwin (1980): Effect of 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex on neurotransmitter systems in subcortical sites in the rat. J Neurochem. 1980 Jan;34(1):91-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1980.tb04625.x. PMID: 6161214.

  26. Kolachana, Saunders, Weinberger (1995): Augmentation of prefrontal cortical monoaminergic activity inhibits dopamine release in the caudate nucleus: an in vivo neurochemical assessment in the rhesus monkey. Neuroscience. 1995 Dec;69(3):859-68. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00246-f. PMID: 8596654.

  27. Jedema, Narendran, Bradberr (2014): Amphetamine-induced release of dopamine in primate prefrontal cortex and striatum: striking differences in magnitude and timecourse. J Neurochem. 2014 Aug;130(4):490-7. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12743. PMID: 24749782; PMCID: PMC4126881.

  28. Hernaus, Mehta (2016): Prefrontal cortex dopamine release measured in vivo with positron emission tomography: Implications for the stimulant paradigm. Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 15;142:663-667. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.057. PMID: 26123374.

  29. Wightman RM, Zimmerman JB (1990): Control of dopamine extracellular concentration in rat striatum by impulse flow and uptake. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1990 May-Aug;15(2):135-44. doi: 10.1016/0165-0173(90)90015-g. PMID: 2282449. REVIEW

  30. Wightman RM, Amatore C, Engstrom RC, Hale PD, Kristensen EW, Kuhr WG, May LJ (1988): Real-time characterization of dopamine overflow and uptake in the rat striatum. Neuroscience. 1988 May;25(2):513-23. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(88)90255-2. PMID: 3399057.

  31. Hill DF, Parent KL, Atcherley CW, Cowen SL, Heien ML (2018): Differential release of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens evoked by low-versus high-frequency medial prefrontal cortex stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2018 Mar-Apr;11(2):426-434. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.11.010. PMID: 29239776; PMCID: PMC6779483.

  32. Klein (2010): Effekte von Enriched Environment auf strukturelle Veränderungen und Verhaltensdefizite nach neonatalen Läsionen des medialen präfrontalen Cortex bei Ratten. Dissertation, Seite 72

  33. Goto, Grace (2005): Dopamine-dependent interactions between limbic and prefrontal cortical plasticity in the nucleus accumbens: disruption by cocaine sensitization. (PMID:16039567), Neuron [01 Jul 2005, 47(2):255-266] DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.017

  34. Goto, Grace (2005): Dopaminergic modulation of limbic and cortical drive of nucleus accumbens in goal-directed behavior. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Jun;8(6):805-12.

  35. Grenhoff, Nisell, Ferré, Aston-Jones, Svensson (1993): Noradrenergic modulation of midbrain dopamine cell firing elicited by stimulation of the locus coeruleus in the rat. J Neural Transm Gen Sect. 1993;93(1):11-25. doi: 10.1007/BF01244934. PMID: 8373553.

  36. Grimm, Kopfer, Küpper-Tetzel, Deppert, Kuhn, de Greck, Reif (2019): Amisulpride and l-DOPA modulate subcortical brain nuclei connectivity in resting-state pharmacologic magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Dec 27. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24913.

  37. Madras, Miller, Fischman (2005): The dopamine transporter and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jun 1;57(11):1397-409. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.011. PMID: 15950014.

  38. Ciliax, Heilman, Demchyshyn, Pristupa, Ince, Hersch, Niznik, Levey (1995):. The dopamine transporter: immunochemical characterization and localization in brain. J Neurosci. 1995 Mar;15(3 Pt 1):1714-23. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-03-01714.1995. PMID: 7534339; PMCID: PMC6578165.

  39. Falkenburger, Barstow, Mintz (2001): Dendrodendritic inhibition through reversal of dopamine transport. Science. 2001 Sep 28;293(5539):2465-70. doi: 10.1126/science.1060645. PMID: 11577238.

  40. Wang, Zhong, Yan (2002): Dopamine D4 receptors modulate GABAergic signaling in pyramidal neurons of prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2002 Nov 1;22(21):9185-93. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-21-09185.2002. PMID: 12417643; PMCID: PMC6758062.