Brain hemispheres
The left and right hemispheres of the brain are not merely “safety backups” for the function of the other half. They have different functions or functional focuses. They are connected by the corpus callosum.
In most people, the left hemisphere is more dominant. The right hemisphere is more strongly associated with emotional processing, the recognition of emotions and stress reactions.
Although separation of the hemispheres by surgery has little effect on functioning in daily life, it can lead to a loss of emotional abilities (including alexithymia) or symbolic imagination and is often accompanied by a reduced cortisol stress response.
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) often causes a loss of information exchange between the hemispheres. In borderline personality disorder, it is assumed that the inability to integrate positive and negative perceptions is due to impaired communication between the hemispheres.
A disturbed bond between infant and mother or early child abuse can lead to an impairment of the right hemisphere of the brain and have a negative impact on the ability to bond and social skills.
The following article is currently based largely on a review by Henry.1
- 1. Right and left hemispheres of the brain
- 2. Brain hemispheres and cortisol
- 3. Brain hemispheres and catecholamines
- 4. Brain hemispheres and ADHD
- 5. Early attachment disorder impairs self-organization of the right hemisphere of the brain
1. Right and left hemispheres of the brain
People with a functional or surgical separation of the connection between the cerebral hemispheres (surgical: commissurotomy, callosotomy, a last resort in epilepsy) function inconspicuously in most everyday situations. Communication between the cerebral hemispheres is helpful, but not vital. Most people are characterized by a dominance of one of the two hemispheres.2
In addition to alexithymia, a separation of the cerebral hemispheres causes a subtle loss of emotional abilities, e.g. with regard to symbolic imagination. PTSD is often accompanied by alexithymia and a loss of information exchange via tactile stimuli between the cerebral hemispheres.3
It has been postulated that the inability to integrate positive and negative perceptions about people (black/white thinking) in borderline could be the result of PTSD, which impedes communication between the cerebral hemispheres.4 In PTSD, differences in the perception of the right and left auditory hemispheres have been found, which are attributed to a disorder in the exchange between the brain hemispheres caused by the traumatic experience.35
Gott et al. describe a subject who was able to switch between two states at will. In a left-hemispheric state, as evidenced by EEG data and task performance scores, she was a businesswoman who enjoyed business planning and meeting people, while in a right-hemispheric state she enjoyed gardening, relaxing, or experiencing an erotic mood with an intimate friend.6
The brain hemispheres have different tasks in relation to attention:7
- Right hemisphere:
- Maintaining alertness
- Processing new stimuli
- Left hemisphere
- Focused attention
- Selective attention
With age, some asymmetries become weaker, others stronger. Some even reversed direction. The total number of regions with significant asymmetries was greater in women than in men, while the total number of significant asymmetries (within regions) and the extent of significant asymmetries was greater in men.
Overall, the effect sizes for both age effects and gender differences were small. Asymmetries are an inherent organizational pattern of the brain that manifests early in life and appears to be relatively stable throughout childhood and adolescence.8
A distinction must be made between
- Laterality (preferred use of one side of the body (brain/hand/foot etc.) for certain tasks or activities)
- Asymmetry (different sizes of organs or organ parts - here: brain regions)
1.1. The right hemisphere of the brain
The right hemisphere of the brain is9
- Mostly the non-dominant hemisphere
- Seemingly more vulnerable to traumatic influences than the left1
- Probably due to their closer connection with the limbic system
- More closely connected to the autonomic nervous system
- Predominant role in
- Physiological and cognitive aspects of emotional processing
- Attention1011 12
- Cognitive control
- Inferior PFC (especially right hemisphere)13
- Inhibition / impulse control
- Inferior PFC (especially right hemisphere)13
- Motor inhibition14
- Interference control
- Inferior PFC (to the same extent as inferior PFC of the left hemisphere)13
- Cognitive flexibility
- Inferior PFC (to the same extent as inferior PFC of the left hemisphere)13
- Emotions
- Recognition of emotions15
- Monkeys that were socially deprived in early childhood showed a deficit in recognizing the emotions of others, as did children with right hemisphere damage.116 Among other things, this manifests itself in a deficit in recognizing emotions in facial expressions.
- Emotion recognition is impaired in ADHD
- Understanding emotions17
- Recognition of subtle emotional expressions15
- Recognition of emotional gestures15
- Richness of the emotional life18
- Control of facial expression18
- Control of speech melody (prosody)18
- Understanding music17
- Understanding body language17
- Processing negative emotions15
- Recognition of emotions15
- Control of the HPA axis (stress axis)19 and the autonomic nervous system (the second important stress regulation system)2021
- Disgust (right frontal and anterior)22
- While satisfaction correlates with anterior temporal left hemisphere activity
- Recognize connections (forest, not just trees)17
- Visualization of perceptions17
- Non-verbal understanding1
- Flashes of inspiration17
- Leaps of thought17
- Daydreams17
- In establishing the feeling that objects such as family possessions and pets are personally familiar. Recording and maintaining personal relevant entities such as “familiar” faces, people, voices, names, linguistic expressions, handwriting, topography.23
- Consolation24
- People with alexithymia use comforting strategies less often than people without ADHD, whereas people with PTSD use them more often.
- Affective reactions to proverbs and idioms, paraphrases, emotional expressions, swearing and slang23
- More dominant in terms of activation of conditioned fear response via amygdala
- Right amygdala is more strongly involved in the storage of frightening faces and in the expression of emotionally influenced memories of aversive experiences25
- Stress reactions and emotional processes appear to be closely linked to the right hemisphere of the brain.21
- Early abuse in the first 2 years of life often leads to disorganized-insecure attachment, which manifests psychologically as an inability to develop a coherent strategy for coping with relationship stress. Early abuse has a negative impact on the development of the right hemisphere of the brain, which is responsible for attachment, affect regulation and stress modulation, thus laying a template for the coping deficits of mind and body that characterize PTSD symptomatology25
- The right hemisphere of the brain is involved in the infant’s attachment to the mother and later in life to other people.23
- Social skills
- Children with right hemispheric damage lose important social skills1
In our opinion, this also applies to ADHD - Adults with right hemispheric damage lose the sense of familiarity that is crucial for bonding.1
We consider whether this could explain the symptom of impaired attachment constancy. - Systems that promote right hemisphere activity appear to be resilience-enhancing and protective against socially dysfunctional behavior, substance abuse, HPA axis failure, and some aspects of chronic disease pathophysiology.1
- Damage to the right hemisphere of the brain caused a loss of ability to grasp, store and process personally relevant and familiar elements of the environment, impairing connection to, response to and interaction with other people.23
- Children with right hemispheric damage lose important social skills1
Stress reactions and emotion-related processes are also processed in the mPFC. Prelimbic and infralimbic regions of the mPFC influence visceral motor regions, autonomic functions and emotional expression and represent an important region for the integration of neuroendocrine and autonomic activity with behavioral states and cognitive processes,1926
Childhood abuse and other traumatic stress experiences caused by inescapable adverse physical, emotional or social events are significant triggers in the pathophysiology of several psychiatric disorders including ADHD.92728
Early stress can cause developmental abnormalities in brain structures that play a crucial role in mediating the response to stress, e.g:927
- Amygdala
- Hippocampus
- Cerebellum
- Anterior cingulate cortex
- Corpus callosum
- And more
Stress reduces BDNF in the hippocampus, among other places, which can influence depression and neurodegenerative processes.2826
1.2. The left hemisphere of the brain
The left hemisphere of the brain is more strongly associated with
Immediately after birth, rats showed large differences in dopamine turnover between the cerebral hemispheres, which decreased with increasing age.29
2. Brain hemispheres and cortisol
A reduced exchange between the brain hemispheres (also in PTSD) appears to be the cause of1
- Reduced cortisol stress response
- Alexithymia.
Furthermore, a coincidence of reduced basal cortisol levels (despite normal cortisol response to ACTH) and alexithymia is reported in some persons with ADHD, from which the authors concluded that ACTH-independent mechanisms reduce cortisol levels.30 For example, the hippocampus is involved in inhibitory regulation of the HPA axis.
Monkeys with greater right hemispheric activation showed a higher CAR (cortisol awakening response) and higher basal cortisol levels. In contrast, monkeys with greater left hemispheric activation showed lower CAR and lower basal cortisol levels, while monkeys with balanced right/left hemispheric activation showed intermediate CAR. The CRH levels correlated with the basal cortisol levels.31
3. Brain hemispheres and catecholamines
It is possible that interhemispheric regulation of the amygdala and hippocampus by dopaminergic ascending systems helps to keep the right and left sides of the hippocampus in harmony.1
Catecholamine asymmetries in the brain could therefore have a concrete benefit.32 Disorder of catecholamine asymmetry could lead to failure of interhemispheric communication and isolation of the HPA axis. The HPA axis appears to be more lateralized to the non-dominant hemisphere.
This could explain why corticoids do not remain elevated in alexithymic states (despite arousal of the fight/flight response).1
This corresponds with our impression that alexithymic states in ADHD are more common in ADHD-HI and ADHD-C than in ADHD-I and that we suspect a frequently flattened cortisol stress response in the former and a very frequently elevated cortisol stress response in the latter.
A reduction in the size of the corpus callosum correlates with reduced communication between the hemispheres.33
In a study using auditory evoked potentials in adults who had been abused in childhood, all of whom had neither acute mental health problems nor an acute Axis I diagnosis, they were first asked to actively recall a neutral or work-related memory and then a disturbing memory from childhood with impairment. In unaffected individuals, both hemispheres appeared to be equally involved in the recall. In adults with childhood trauma, there was a clear suppression of evoked potentials in the left hemisphere during recall of the neutral memory, indicating increased processing in the left hemisphere. During recall of the distressing event, there was a robust shift in laterality in evoked potentials. These were suppressed in the right hemisphere, indicating increased activation of the right hemisphere. Apparently, early maltreatment is associated with increased hemispheric laterality and decreased hemispheric integration.3435
In states of strong emotional or cognitive stress, events in the right hemisphere are functionally separated from the left hemisphere by inhibiting transmission between the brain hemispheres, even in neurologically intact people.36 This can trigger alexithymic states, such as reduced emotional empathy with unchanged cognitive empathy.
See also ⇒ Empathy in ADHD In the article ⇒ Complete list of ADHD symptoms according to manifestations in the chapter ⇒ Symptoms.
4. Brain hemispheres and ADHD
One hypothesis assumes that ADHD (in addition to delayed cortical maturation) is due to3738
Overactivity of the left hemisphere can lead to hyperactivity of motor skills and behavior.
Hypoactivity of the right hemisphere, which is largely responsible for (sustained) attention, explains the attention deficit.391240
ADHD patients showed
- significantly increased lateralization to the left in the inferior OFC. The lateralization indices correlated with ADHD symptoms41
- a lower lateralization to the right in the mOFC and in the rectus gyrus. The lateralization indices correlated with ADHD symptoms.41
- significantly increased lateralization to the right in the inferior frontal gyrus (opercular), in the precuneus and in the paracentral lobule42
- less lateralization to the right in the insula42
- Women with ADHD showed
- a significant lateralization to the right in the putamen and in lobule VII of the cerebellar hemisphere42
- Compared to ADHD-I, ADHD-C patients showed42
- increased lateralization to the right in the inferior frontal gyrus (opercular)
- reduced lateralization to the right in the inferior temporal gyrus.
- lateralization correlated with the values for inattentive and hyper/impulsive behaviors
- SHR showed left lateralized brain connectivity43
Hyperreactivity of one hemisphere of the brain in combination with underdevelopment of the contralateral hemisphere corresponds to the nature of many neurobehavioral disorders.44
Differences in the size of the same brain regions in the two hemispheres were not significant in a very large study (n = 3,762).45
In a smaller study, asymmetries in mean diffusivity were found in the cingulum, inferior and superior longitudinal fascicles, and corticospinal tracts (n = 104). Stimulant treatment tended to reduce this asymmetry. Caudate, hippocampal, thalamic, and amygdala gray matter volumes were more asymmetric in ADHD patients, and asymmetry differences were more significant than lateralized comparisons (n = 849).46
Diffusion imaging studies in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have revealed changes in anatomical brain connections, such as the frontoparietal junction known as the superior longitudinal fiber (SLF). Studies in neurotypical adults have shown that the three SLF branches (SLF I, II, III) support different brain functions such as attention and inhibition and that their lateralization pattern is related to attentional performance. However, most studies on ADHD have examined the SLF as a single bundle and in children, so the possible contribution of lateralization of the SLF branches to the pathophysiology of ADHD in adults has not yet been clarified.
Altered asymmetry, particularly of the dorsal branch of the frontoparietal junction, which is the superior longitudinal fiber (SLF), may contribute to the pathophysiology of ADHD in adults.
Diffusion-weighted spherical deconvolution tractography was used to examine the three SLF branches (SLF I, II, III) in 60 adults with ADHD-I (including 26 responders and 34 non-responders to methylphenidate, MPH) and 20 control subjects. All three SLF branches were lateralized in adults with ADHD, but not in the control subjects. Lateralization of the SLF I HMOA was associated with line bisection performance, but not with SLF II volume, as previously reported in control subjects. In addition, increased left lateralization of the SLF I HMOA was associated with higher levels of hyperactivity in the ADHD-I group.47
5. Early attachment disorder impairs self-organization of the right hemisphere of the brain
In infancy, the homeostatic structures between the “lower” autonomic and “higher” central brain systems develop in the right hemisphere of the brain48, which serve to generate, regulate and stabilize psychobiological states.
The right hemisphere is much more strongly connected to the limbic system and the mechanisms of autonomic and behavioral arousal than the left hemisphere. The maturation of the right hemisphere is dependent on experience.49
Disorders in the bond between infant and mother can therefore cause developmental disorders in the right hemisphere of the brain, affecting the modulation of arousal and the regulation of the neurotransmitters dopamine and noradrenaline. Among other things, dopamine and noradrenaline are responsible for
The brain’s maturation processes are responsible for this.5051
ADHD is described as a developmental disorder of the brain in the sense of a developmental delay. Numerous studies confirm that early childhood stress experiences can cause such changes in behavior and neurotransmitters. ⇒ Stress damage due to early / prolonged stress
We see no contradiction here to the predominantly genetic cause of ADHD.
Firstly, the dopaminergic and noradrenergic changes that affect brain development can be caused by genes as well as by corresponding environmental influences during developmental spurts of the brain regions concerned.
Secondly, the assumed 75 % heritability necessarily implies 25 % other causes.
Thirdly, environmental influences can mediate their effects through epigenetic changes, which in turn can be passed on for a few generations.
Fourthly, gene-environment interactions are known, especially with regard to the important gene candidates for ADHD DRD4-7R, COMT and MAO-A. Early childhood attachment problems can represent such an environmental influence.
Henry (1997): Psychological and physiological responses to stress: the right hemisphere and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, an inquiry into problems of human bonding. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1997;640:10-25. PMID: 9401599. REVIEW ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥
Galin (1974) Implications for psychiatry of left and right cerebral specialization. A neurophysiological context for unconscious processes. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1974 Oct;31(4):572-83. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1974.01760160110022. PMID: 4421063., zitiert nach Henry (1997): Psychological and physiological responses to stress: the right hemisphere and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, an inquiry into problems of human bonding. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1997;640:10-25. PMID: 9401599. REVIEW. ↥
Zeitlin, Lane, O’Leary, Schrift (1989): Interhemispheric transfer deficit and alexithymia. Am J Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;146(11):1434-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.146.11.1434. PMID: 2817114. ↥ ↥
Muller (1992) Is there a neural basis for borderline splitting? Compr Psychiatry. 1992 Mar-Apr;33(2):92-104. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(92)90004-a. PMID: 1544302. REVIEW ↥
Shalev, Attias, Bleich, Shulman, Kotler, Shahar (1988): Audiological evaluation of nonalcoholic, drug-free posttraumatic stress disorder patients. Biol Psychiatry. 1988 Sep;24(5):522-30. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(88)90163-1. PMID: 3167141. ↥
Gott, Hughes, Whipple (1984): Voluntary control of two lateralized conscious states: validation by electrical and behavioral studies. Neuropsychologia. 1984;22(1):65-72. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(84)90008-3. PMID: 6709177., zitiert nach Henry (1997): Psychological and physiological responses to stress: the right hemisphere and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, an inquiry into problems of human bonding. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1997;640:10-25. PMID: 9401599. REVIEW. ↥
Brandau (2004): Das ADHS-Puzzle; Systemisch-evolutionäre Aspekte, Unfallrisiko und klinische Perspektiven. Seite 35 ↥
Kurth F, Schijven D, van den Heuvel OA, Hoogman M, van Rooij D, Stein DJ, Buitelaar JK, Bölte S, Auzias G, Kushki A, Venkatasubramanian G, Rubia K, Bollmann S, Isaksson J, Jaspers-Fayer F, Marsh R, Batistuzzo MC, Arnold PD, Bressan RA, Stewart SE, Gruner P, Sorensen L, Pan PM, Silk TJ, Gur RC, Cubillo AI, Haavik J, O’Gorman Tuura RL, Hartman CA, Calvo R, McGrath J, Calderoni S, Jackowski A, Chantiluke KC, Satterthwaite TD, Busatto GF, Nigg JT, Gur RE, Retico A, Tosetti M, Gallagher L, Szeszko PR, Neufeld J, Ortiz AE, Ghisleni C, Lazaro L, Hoekstra PJ, Anagnostou E, Hoekstra L, Simpson B, Plessen JK, Deruelle C, Soreni N, James A, Narayanaswamy J, Reddy JY, Fitzgerald J, Bellgrove MA, Salum GA, Janssen J, Muratori F, Vila M, Giral MG, Ameis SH, Bosco P, Remnélius KL, Huyser C, Pariente JC, Jalbrzikowski M, Rosa PG, O’Hearn KM, Ehrlich S, Mollon J, Zugman A, Christakou A, Arango C, Fisher SE, Kong X, Franke B, Medland SE, Thomopoulos SI, Jahanshad N, Glahn DC, Thompson PM, Francks C, Luders E (2024): Large-scale analysis of structural brain asymmetries during neurodevelopment: Associations with age and sex in 4265 children and adolescents. Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Aug 1;45(11):e26754. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26754. PMID: 39046031; PMCID: PMC11267452. ↥
Bob, Konicarova (2018): ADHD, Stress, and Development, S. 24 ↥ ↥ ↥
Bartolomeo P, Seidel Malkinson T (2019): Hemispheric lateralization of attention processes in the human brain. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Oct;29:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.12.023. PMID: 30711910. REVIEW ↥
Longo MR, Trippier S, Vagnoni E, Lourenco SF (2015): Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention in near space. Neuropsychologia. 2015 Apr;70:350-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.035. PMID: 25446963. ↥
Heilman KM, Voeller KK, Nadeau SE (1991): A possible pathophysiologic substrate of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Child Neurol. 1991;6 Suppl:S76-81. doi: 10.1177/0883073891006001s09. PMID: 2002218. REVIEW ↥ ↥
Arnsten AF, Rubia K (2012): Neurobiological circuits regulating attention, cognitive control, motivation, and emotion: disruptions in neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;51(4):356-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.01.008. PMID: 22449642. REVIEW ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥
Bernal B, Altman N (2009): Neural networks of motor and cognitive inhibition are dissociated between brain hemispheres: an fMRI study. Int J Neurosci. 2009;119(10):1848-80. doi: 10.1080/00207450802333029. PMID: 19922390. ↥ ↥
Silberman, Weingartner (1986): Hemispheric lateralization of functions related to emotion. Brain Cogn. 1986 Jul;5(3):322-53. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(86)90035-7. PMID: 3530287. ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥
Voeller (1986): Right-hemisphere deficit syndrome in children. Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Aug;143(8):1004-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.8.1004. PMID: 3728713. ↥
Joseph (1992): The Right Brain and the Unconscious: Discovering the Stranger Within, zitiert nach Henry (1997): Psychological and physiological responses to stress: the right hemisphere and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, an inquiry into problems of human bonding. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1997;640:10-25. PMID: 9401599. REVIEW. ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥
Henry (1997): Psychological and physiological responses to stress: the right hemisphere and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, an inquiry into problems of human bonding. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1997;640:10-25. PMID: 9401599. REVIEW, mit Verweis auf Cutting (1990): The right cerebral hemisphere and psychiatric disorders. ↥ ↥ ↥
Sullivan, Gratton (2002): Prefrontal cortical regulation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function in the rat and implications for psychopathology: side matters. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2002 Jan-Feb;27(1-2):99-114. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4530(01)00038-5. PMID: 11750772. ↥ ↥
Spence, Shapiro, Zaidel (1996): The role of the right hemisphere in the physiological and cognitive components of emotional processing. Psychophysiology. 1996 Mar;33(2):112-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb02115.x. PMID: 8851239. ↥
Sullivan, Gratton (1999): Lateralized effects of medial prefrontal cortex lesions on neuroendocrine and autonomic stress responses in rats. J Neurosci. 1999 Apr 1;19(7):2834-40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-07-02834.1999. PMID: 10087094; PMCID: PMC6786056. ↥ ↥
Davidson, Ekman, Saron, Senulis, Friesen (1990): Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: emotional expression and brain physiology. I. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Feb;58(2):330-41. PMID: 2319445. ↥ ↥ ↥
Van Lancker (1991): Personal relevance and the human right hemisphere. Brain Cogn. 1991 Sep;17(1):64-92. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(91)90067-i. PMID: 1781982. REVIEW ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥
Horton, Gewirtz, Kreutter (1989): Alexithymia and solace. Psychother Psychosom. 1989;51(2):91-5. doi: 10.1159/000288141. PMID: 2626530. ↥
Schore (2002): Dysregulation of the right brain: a fundamental mechanism of traumatic attachment and the psychopathogenesis of posttraumatic stress disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;36(1):9-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.00996.x. PMID: 11929435. REVIEW ↥ ↥
Li, Wu, Liao, Ouyang, Du, Lei, Chen, Yao, Huang, Gong (2004): Grey matter reduction associated with posttraumatic stress disorder and traumatic stress. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Jun;43:163-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.04.003. PMID: 24769403. ↥ ↥
Teicher, Andersen, Polcari, Anderson, Navalta, Kim (2003): The neurobiological consequences of early stress and childhood maltreatment. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2003 Jan-Mar;27(1-2):33-44. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(03)00007-1. PMID: 12732221. REVIEW ↥ ↥
Duman, Monteggia (2006): A neurotrophic model for stress-related mood disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Jun 15;59(12):1116-27. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.02.013. PMID: 16631126. REVIEW ↥ ↥
Rodriguez, Martin, Santana (1994): Ontogenic development of brain asymmetry in dopaminergic neurons. Brain Res Bull. 1994;33(2):163-71. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(94)90246-1. PMID: 8275334. ↥
Mason, Giller, Kosten, Yehuda (1990), zitiert nach Henry (1997): Psychological and physiological responses to stress: the right hemisphere and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, an inquiry into problems of human bonding. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1997;640:10-25. PMID: 9401599. REVIEW ↥
Davidson (2000): Affective style, psychopathology, and resilience: brain mechanisms and plasticity. Am Psychol. 2000 Nov;55(11):1196-214. ↥
Carlson, Glick (1991): Brain laterality as a determinant of susceptibility to depression in an animal model. Brain Res. 1991 Jun 7;550(2):324-8. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(91)91335-x. PMID: 1884240. ↥
Yazgan, Wexler, Kinsbourne, Peterson, Leckman (1995): Functional significance of individual variations in callosal area. Neuropsychologia. 1995 Jun;33(6):769-79. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00018-x. PMID: 7675166. ↥
Schiffer, Teicher, Papanicolaou (1995): Evoked potential evidence for right brain activity during the recall of traumatic memories. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1995 Spring;7(2):169-75. doi: 10.1176/jnp.7.2.169. PMID: 7626959. n = 20 ↥
Teicher, Andersen, Polcari, Anderson, Navalta (2002): Developmental neurobiology of childhood stress and trauma. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2002 Jun;25(2):397-426, vii-viii. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(01)00003-x. PMID: 12136507. ↥
Galin (1974): Implications for psychiatry of left and right cerebral specialization. A neurophysiological context for unconscious processes. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1974 Oct;31(4):572-83. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1974.01760160110022. PMID: 4421063. ↥
Rubia K (2007): Neuro-anatomic evidence for the maturational delay hypothesis of ADHD. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19663-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710329105. PMID: 18077397; PMCID: PMC2148352. ↥
Shaw P, Eckstrand K, Sharp W, Blumenthal J, Lerch JP, Greenstein D, Clasen L, Evans A, Giedd J, Rapoport JL (2007): Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is characterized by a delay in cortical maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 4;104(49):19649-54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707741104. Epub 2007 Nov 16. PMID: 18024590; PMCID: PMC2148343.}}) als weitere Ursache Abweichungen in der asymmetrischen Gehirnentwicklung hat. Entwicklungsunterschiede in der Entwicklung der hemisphärischen Asymmetrien sollen viele ADHS-Symptome erklären können:{{Leisman G, Melillo R (2022): Front and center: Maturational dysregulation of frontal lobe functional neuroanatomic connections in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Front Neuroanat. 2022 Aug 23;16:936025. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2022.936025. PMID: 36081853; PMCID: PMC9446472. ↥
Stefanatos GA, Wasserstein J (2001): Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder as a right hemisphere syndrome. Selective literature review and detailed neuropsychological case studies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Jun;931:172-95. PMID: 11462741. REVIEW ↥
Voeller KK, Heilman KM (1988): Attention deficit disorder in children: a neglect syndrome? Neurology. 1988 May;38(5):806-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.38.5.806. PMID: 3362382. n = 12 ↥
Zou H, Yang J (2021): Temporal Variability-Based Functional Brain Lateralization Study in ADHD. J Atten Disord. 2021 Apr;25(6):839-847. doi: 10.1177/1087054719859074. PMID: 31268386. ↥ ↥
Zou H, Yang J (2021): Exploring the Brain Lateralization in ADHD Based on Variability of Resting-State fMRI Signal. J Atten Disord. 2021 Jan;25(2):258-264. doi: 10.1177/1087054718816170. PMID: 30520697. ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥
Ha S, Lee H, Choi Y, Kang H, Jeon SJ, Ryu JH, Kim HJ, Cheong JH, Lim S, Kim BN, Lee DS (2020): Maturational delay and asymmetric information flow of brain connectivity in SHR model of ADHD revealed by topological analysis of metabolic networks. Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 21;10(1):3197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59921-4. PMID: 32081992; PMCID: PMC7035354. ↥
Leisman G, Melillo R (2022): Front and center: Maturational dysregulation of frontal lobe functional neuroanatomic connections in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Front Neuroanat. 2022 Aug 23;16:936025. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2022.936025. PMID: 36081853; PMCID: PMC9446472. ↥
Postema MC, Hoogman M, Ambrosino S, Asherson P, Banaschewski T, Bandeira CE, Baranov A, Bau CHD, Baumeister S, Baur-Streubel R, Bellgrove MA, Biederman J, Bralten J, Brandeis D, Brem S, Buitelaar JK, Busatto GF, Castellanos FX, Cercignani M, Chaim-Avancini TM, Chantiluke KC, Christakou A, Coghill D, Conzelmann A, Cubillo AI, Cupertino RB, de Zeeuw P, Doyle AE, Durston S, Earl EA, Epstein JN, Ethofer T, Fair DA, Fallgatter AJ, Faraone SV, Frodl T, Gabel MC, Gogberashvili T, Grevet EH, Haavik J, Harrison NA, Hartman CA, Heslenfeld DJ, Hoekstra PJ, Hohmann S, Høvik MF, Jernigan TL, Kardatzki B, Karkashadze G, Kelly C, Kohls G, Konrad K, Kuntsi J, Lazaro L, Lera-Miguel S, Lesch KP, Louza MR, Lundervold AJ, Malpas CB, Mattos P, McCarthy H, Namazova-Baranova L, Nicolau R, Nigg JT, Novotny SE, Oberwelland Weiss E, O’Gorman Tuura RL, Oosterlaan J, Oranje B, Paloyelis Y, Pauli P, Picon FA, Plessen KJ, Ramos-Quiroga JA, Reif A, Reneman L, Rosa PGP, Rubia K, Schrantee A, Schweren LJS, Seitz J, Shaw P, Silk TJ, Skokauskas N, Soliva Vila JC, Stevens MC, Sudre G, Tamm L, Tovar-Moll F, van Erp TGM, Vance A, Vilarroya O, Vives-Gilabert Y, von Polier GG, Walitza S, Yoncheva YN, Zanetti MV, Ziegler GC, Glahn DC, Jahanshad N, Medland SE; ENIGMA ADHD Working Group; Thompson PM, Fisher SE, Franke B, Francks C (2021): Analysis of structural brain asymmetries in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in 39 datasets. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;62(10):1202-1219. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13396. PMID: 33748971; PMCID: PMC8455726. n = 3.762 ↥
Douglas PK, Gutman B, Anderson A, Larios C, Lawrence KE, Narr K, Sengupta B, Cooray G, Douglas DB, Thompson PM, McGough JJ, Bookheimer SY (2018): Hemispheric brain asymmetry differences in youths with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Feb 24;18:744-752. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.02.020. PMID: 29876263; PMCID: PMC5988460. ↥
Parlatini V, Radua J, Robertsson N, Lintas A, Atuk E, dell’Acqua F, Thiebaut de Schotten M, Murphy D (2024): Asymmetry of attentive networks contributes to adult Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) pathophysiology. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Nov 2. doi: 10.1007/s00406-024-01927-4. PMID: 39487888. ↥
Chiron, Jambaque, Nabbout, Lounes, Syrota, Dulac (1997): The right brain hemisphere is dominant in human infants. Brain. 1997 Jun;120 ( Pt 6):1057-65. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.6.1057. PMID: 9217688. ↥
Schore (2000): The self-organisation of the right brain and the neurobiology of emotional development. S. 155 – 185, 156 In: Lewis, Granic (Herausgeber): Emotion, development, and self-organisation. ↥
Brandau (2004): Das ADHS-Puzzle; Systemisch-evolutionäre Aspekte, Unfallrisiko und klinische Perspektiven. Seite 40 ↥
Schore (2000): The self-organisation of the right brain and the neurobiology of emotional development. S. 155 – 185, 167 In: Lewis, Granic (Herausgeber): Emotion, development, and self-organisation. ↥