Dear reader of ADxS.org, please excuse the disruption.

ADxS.org needs around €58,500 in 2024. Unfortunately 99,8 % of our readers do not donate. If everyone reading this appeal made a small contribution, our fundraising campaign for 2024 would be over after a few days. This appeal is displayed 23,000 times a week, but only 75 people donate. If you find ADxS.org useful, please take a minute to support ADxS.org with your donation. Thank you very much!

Since 01.06.2021 ADxS.org is supported by the non-profit ADxS e.V. Donations to ADxS e.V. are tax-deductible in Germany (up to €300, the remittance slip is sufficient as a donation receipt).

If you would prefer to make an active contribution, you can find ideas for Participation or active support here.

$39778 of $63500 - as of 2024-09-30
62%
Header Image
Brain hemispheres

Sitemap

Brain hemispheres

The cerebral hemispheres, the left and right sides of the brain, are not merely “safety backups” for the function of the other half. They have different functions or functional focuses. They are connected by the corpus callosum.
In most people, the left hemisphere is more dominant. The right hemisphere is more strongly associated with emotional processing, the recognition of emotions and stress reactions.
Although separation of the hemispheres by surgery has little effect on functioning in daily life, it can lead to a loss of emotional abilities (including alexithymia) or symbolic imagination and is often accompanied by a reduced cortisol stress response.
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) often causes a loss of information exchange between the hemispheres. In borderline personality disorder, it is assumed that the inability to integrate positive and negative perceptions is due to impaired communication between the hemispheres.
A disturbed bond between infant and mother or early child abuse can lead to an impairment of the right hemisphere of the brain and have a negative impact on the ability to bond and social skills.

The following article is currently based largely on a review by Henry.1

1. Right and left hemispheres of the brain

People with a functional or surgical separation of the connection between the cerebral hemispheres (surgical: commissurotomy, callosotomy, a last resort in epilepsy) function inconspicuously in most everyday situations. Communication between the cerebral hemispheres is helpful, but not vital. Most people are characterized by a dominance of one of the two hemispheres.2
In addition to alexithymia, a separation of the cerebral hemispheres causes a subtle loss of emotional abilities, e.g. with regard to symbolic imagination. PTSD is often accompanied by alexithymia and a loss of information exchange via tactile stimuli between the cerebral hemispheres.3
It has been postulated that the inability to integrate positive and negative perceptions of people (black/white thinking) in borderline patients could be the result of PTSD, which impedes communication between the cerebral hemispheres.4 In PTSD, differences in the perception of the right and left auditory hemispheres have been found, which are attributed to a disturbance in the exchange between the brain hemispheres caused by the traumatic experience.35

Gott et al. describe a subject who was able to switch between two states at will. In a left-hemispheric state, as evidenced by EEG data and task performance scores, she was a businesswoman who enjoyed business planning and meeting people, while in a right-hemispheric state she enjoyed gardening, relaxing, or experiencing an erotic mood with an intimate friend.6

The brain hemispheres have different tasks in relation to attention:7

  • Right hemisphere:
    • Maintaining alertness
    • Processing new stimuli
  • Left hemisphere
    • Focused attention
    • Selective attention

1.1. The right hemisphere of the brain

The right hemisphere of the brain is8

  • Mostly the non-dominant hemisphere
  • Seemingly more vulnerable to traumatic influences than the left1
    • Probably due to their closer connection with the limbic system
  • More closely connected to the autonomic nervous system
  • Predominant role in
    • Physiological and cognitive aspects of emotional processing
    • Emotions
      • Recognition of emotions9
      • Understanding emotions10
      • Recognition of subtle emotional expressions9
      • Recognition of emotional gestures9
      • Richness of the emotional life11
      • Control of facial expression11
      • Control of speech melody (prosody)11
      • Music appreciation10
      • Understanding body language10
      • Processing negative emotions9
    • Control of the HPA axis (stress axis)12 and the autonomic nervous system (the second important stress regulation system)1314
    • Disgust (right frontal and anterior)15
      • While satisfaction correlates with anterior temporal left hemisphere activity
    • Recognize connections (forest, not just trees)10
    • Visualization of perceptions10
    • Non-verbal understanding1
    • Flashes of inspiration10
    • Leaps of thought10
    • Daydreams10
    • In establishing the feeling that objects such as family possessions and pets are personally familiar. Recording and maintaining personal relevant entities such as “familiar” faces, people, voices, names, linguistic expressions, handwriting, topography.16
    • Consolation17
      • Alexithymia sufferers use comforting strategies less frequently than non-affected people, whereas PTSD sufferers use them more often.
    • Affective reactions to proverbs and idioms, paraphrases, emotional expressions, swearing and slang16
  • More dominant in terms of activation of conditioned fear response via amygdala
    • Right amygdala is more strongly involved in the storage of frightening faces and in the expression of emotionally influenced memories of aversive experiences18
  • Stress reactions and emotional processes appear to be closely linked to the right hemisphere of the brain.14
  • Early abuse in the first 2 years of life often leads to disorganized-insecure attachment, which manifests psychologically as an inability to develop a coherent strategy for coping with relationship stress. Early abuse negatively affects the development of the right hemisphere of the brain, which is responsible for attachment, affect regulation and stress modulation, thus laying a template for the coping deficits of mind and body that characterize PTSD symptomatology18
    • The right hemisphere of the brain is involved in the infant’s attachment to the mother and later in life to other people.16
  • Children with right hemispheric damage lose important social skills1
    In our opinion, this also applies to ADHD
  • Adults with right hemispheric damage lose the associated sense of familiarity that is crucial for bonding.1
    In our opinion, this is not typical of ADHD, but could be a more common comorbidity
  • Systems that promote right hemisphere activity appear to be resilience-enhancing and protective against socially dysfunctional behavior, substance abuse, HPA axis failure, and some aspects of chronic disease pathophysiology.1

Stress reactions and emotion-related processes are also processed in the mPFC. Prelimbic and infralimbic regions of the mPFC influence visceral motor regions, autonomic functions and emotional expression and represent an important region for the integration of neuroendocrine and autonomic activity with behavioral states and cognitive processes,1219

Childhood abuse and other traumatic stress experiences caused by unavoidable adverse physical, emotional or social events are significant triggers in the pathophysiology of various psychiatric disorders including ADHD.82021

Early stress can cause developmental abnormalities in brain structures that play a crucial role in mediating the response to stress, e.g:820

  • Amygdala
  • Hippocampus
  • Cerebellum
  • Anterior cingulate cortex
  • Corpus callosum
  • And more

Monkeys that were socially deprived in early childhood showed a deficit in recognizing the emotions of others, as did children with right hemisphere damage.122 Among other things, this manifests itself in a deficit in recognizing emotions in facial expressions.
Damage to the right hemisphere of the brain caused a loss of ability to grasp, store and process personally relevant and familiar elements of the environment, impairing connection to, response to and interaction with other people.16

Stress reduces BDNF in the hippocampus, among other places, which can influence depression and neurodegenerative processes.2119

1.2. The left hemisphere of the brain

The left hemisphere of the brain is more strongly associated with

  • Coping15
  • Flight/Fight15
  • Verbal understanding
  • Verbal expression1

Immediately after birth, rats showed large differences in dopamine turnover between the cerebral hemispheres, which decreased with increasing age.23

2. Brain hemispheres and cortisol

A reduced exchange between the brain hemispheres (also in PTSD) appears to be the cause of1

  • Reduced cortisol stress response
  • Alexithymia.

Furthermore, a coincidence of reduced basal cortisol levels (despite a normal cortisol response to ACTH) and alexithymia has been reported in some chronic stress sufferers, from which the authors concluded that ACTH-independent mechanisms reduce cortisol levels.24 For example, the hippocampus is involved in inhibitory regulation of the HPA axis.

Monkeys with greater right hemispheric activation showed a higher CAR (cortisol awakening response) and higher basal cortisol levels. In contrast, monkeys with greater left hemispheric activation showed lower CAR and lower basal cortisol levels, while monkeys with balanced right/left hemispheric activation showed intermediate CAR. The CRH levels correlated with the basal cortisol levels.25

3. Brain hemispheres and catecholamines

It is possible that interhemispheric regulation of the amygdala and hippocampus by dopaminergic ascending systems helps to keep the right and left sides of the hippocampus in harmony.1
Catecholamine asymmetries in the brain could therefore have a concrete benefit.26 Disruption of the asymmetry of catecholamines could lead to a failure of interhemispheric communication and isolation of the HPA axis. The HPA axis appears to be more lateralized to the non-dominant hemisphere.
This could explain why corticoids do not remain elevated in alexithymic states (despite arousal of the fight/flight response).1

This corresponds with our impression that alexithymic states in ADHD are more common in ADHD-HI and ADHD-C than in ADHD-I and that we suspect a frequently flattened cortisol stress response in the former and a very frequently increased cortisol stress response in the latter.

A reduction in the size of the corpus callosum correlates with reduced communication between the hemispheres.27
In a study using auditory evoked potentials in adults who had been abused in childhood, none of whom had acute mental health problems or an acute Axis I diagnosis, they were asked to first actively recall a neutral or work-related memory and then a disturbing memory from childhood with impairment. In unaffected individuals, both hemispheres appeared to be equally involved in the recall. In adults with childhood trauma, there was a clear suppression of evoked potentials in the left hemisphere during recall of the neutral memory, indicating enhanced processing in the left hemisphere. During recall of the distressing event, there was a robust shift in laterality in evoked potentials. These were suppressed in the right hemisphere, indicating increased activation of the right hemisphere. Apparently, early maltreatment is associated with increased hemispheric laterality and decreased hemispheric integration.2829

In states of strong emotional or cognitive stress, events in the right hemisphere are functionally separated from the left hemisphere by inhibiting transmission between the brain hemispheres, even in neurologically intact people.30 This can trigger alexithymic states, such as reduced emotional empathy with unchanged cognitive empathy.

See also Empathy with ADHD In the article Complete list of ADHD symptoms according to manifestations in the chapter Symptoms.

4. Early attachment disorder impairs self-organization of the right hemisphere of the brain

In infancy, the homeostatic structures between the “lower” autonomic and “higher” central brain systems develop in the right hemisphere of the brain31, which serve to generate, regulate and stabilize psychobiological states.
The right hemisphere is much more strongly connected to the limbic system and the mechanisms of autonomic and behavioral arousal than the left hemisphere. The maturation of the right hemisphere is dependent on experience.32

Disturbances in the bond between infant and mother can therefore cause developmental disorders in the right hemisphere of the brain, which influence the modulation of arousal and the regulation of the neurotransmitters dopamine and noradrenaline. Among other things, dopamine and noradrenaline are responsible for
The brain’s maturation processes are responsible for this.3334

ADHD is described as a developmental disorder of the brain in the sense of a developmental delay. Numerous studies confirm that early childhood stress experiences can cause such changes in behavior and neurotransmitters. Stress damage due to early / prolonged stress

We see no contradiction here to the predominantly genetic cause of ADHD.
Firstly, the dopaminergic and noradrenergic changes that affect brain development can be caused by genes as well as by corresponding environmental influences during developmental spurts of the brain regions concerned.
Secondly, the assumed 75 % heritability necessarily implies 25 % other causes.
Thirdly, environmental influences can mediate their effects through epigenetic changes, which in turn can be passed on for a few generations.
Fourthly, gene-environment interactions are known, particularly with regard to the important gene candidates for ADHD DRD4-7R, COMT and MAO-A. Early childhood attachment problems can represent such an environmental influence.


  1. Henry (1997): Psychological and physiological responses to stress: the right hemisphere and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, an inquiry into problems of human bonding. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1997;640:10-25. PMID: 9401599. REVIEW

  2. Galin (1974) Implications for psychiatry of left and right cerebral specialization. A neurophysiological context for unconscious processes. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1974 Oct;31(4):572-83. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1974.01760160110022. PMID: 4421063., zitiert nach Henry (1997): Psychological and physiological responses to stress: the right hemisphere and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, an inquiry into problems of human bonding. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1997;640:10-25. PMID: 9401599. REVIEW.

  3. Zeitlin, Lane, O’Leary, Schrift (1989): Interhemispheric transfer deficit and alexithymia. Am J Psychiatry. 1989 Nov;146(11):1434-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.146.11.1434. PMID: 2817114.

  4. Muller (1992) Is there a neural basis for borderline splitting? Compr Psychiatry. 1992 Mar-Apr;33(2):92-104. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(92)90004-a. PMID: 1544302. REVIEW

  5. Shalev, Attias, Bleich, Shulman, Kotler, Shahar (1988): Audiological evaluation of nonalcoholic, drug-free posttraumatic stress disorder patients. Biol Psychiatry. 1988 Sep;24(5):522-30. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(88)90163-1. PMID: 3167141.

  6. Gott, Hughes, Whipple (1984): Voluntary control of two lateralized conscious states: validation by electrical and behavioral studies. Neuropsychologia. 1984;22(1):65-72. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(84)90008-3. PMID: 6709177., zitiert nach Henry (1997): Psychological and physiological responses to stress: the right hemisphere and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, an inquiry into problems of human bonding. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1997;640:10-25. PMID: 9401599. REVIEW.

  7. Brandau (2004): Das ADHS-Puzzle; Systemisch-evolutionäre Aspekte, Unfallrisiko und klinische Perspektiven. Seite 35

  8. Bob, Konicarova (2018): ADHD, Stress, and Development, S. 24

  9. Silberman, Weingartner (1986): Hemispheric lateralization of functions related to emotion. Brain Cogn. 1986 Jul;5(3):322-53. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(86)90035-7. PMID: 3530287.

  10. Joseph (1992): The Right Brain and the Unconscious: Discovering the Stranger Within, zitiert nach Henry (1997): Psychological and physiological responses to stress: the right hemisphere and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, an inquiry into problems of human bonding. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1997;640:10-25. PMID: 9401599. REVIEW.

  11. Henry (1997): Psychological and physiological responses to stress: the right hemisphere and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, an inquiry into problems of human bonding. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1997;640:10-25. PMID: 9401599. REVIEW, mit Verweis auf Cutting (1990): The right cerebral hemisphere and psychiatric disorders.

  12. Sullivan, Gratton (2002): Prefrontal cortical regulation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function in the rat and implications for psychopathology: side matters. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2002 Jan-Feb;27(1-2):99-114. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4530(01)00038-5. PMID: 11750772.

  13. Spence, Shapiro, Zaidel (1996): The role of the right hemisphere in the physiological and cognitive components of emotional processing. Psychophysiology. 1996 Mar;33(2):112-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb02115.x. PMID: 8851239.

  14. Sullivan, Gratton (1999): Lateralized effects of medial prefrontal cortex lesions on neuroendocrine and autonomic stress responses in rats. J Neurosci. 1999 Apr 1;19(7):2834-40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-07-02834.1999. PMID: 10087094; PMCID: PMC6786056.

  15. Davidson, Ekman, Saron, Senulis, Friesen (1990): Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: emotional expression and brain physiology. I. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Feb;58(2):330-41. PMID: 2319445.

  16. Van Lancker (1991): Personal relevance and the human right hemisphere. Brain Cogn. 1991 Sep;17(1):64-92. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(91)90067-i. PMID: 1781982. REVIEW

  17. Horton, Gewirtz, Kreutter (1989): Alexithymia and solace. Psychother Psychosom. 1989;51(2):91-5. doi: 10.1159/000288141. PMID: 2626530.

  18. Schore (2002): Dysregulation of the right brain: a fundamental mechanism of traumatic attachment and the psychopathogenesis of posttraumatic stress disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;36(1):9-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.00996.x. PMID: 11929435. REVIEW

  19. Li, Wu, Liao, Ouyang, Du, Lei, Chen, Yao, Huang, Gong (2004): Grey matter reduction associated with posttraumatic stress disorder and traumatic stress. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Jun;43:163-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.04.003. PMID: 24769403.

  20. Teicher, Andersen, Polcari, Anderson, Navalta, Kim (2003): The neurobiological consequences of early stress and childhood maltreatment. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2003 Jan-Mar;27(1-2):33-44. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(03)00007-1. PMID: 12732221. REVIEW

  21. Duman, Monteggia (2006): A neurotrophic model for stress-related mood disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Jun 15;59(12):1116-27. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.02.013. PMID: 16631126. REVIEW

  22. Voeller (1986): Right-hemisphere deficit syndrome in children. Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Aug;143(8):1004-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.8.1004. PMID: 3728713.

  23. Rodriguez, Martin, Santana (1994): Ontogenic development of brain asymmetry in dopaminergic neurons. Brain Res Bull. 1994;33(2):163-71. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(94)90246-1. PMID: 8275334.

  24. Mason, Giller, Kosten, Yehuda (1990), zitiert nach Henry (1997): Psychological and physiological responses to stress: the right hemisphere and the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, an inquiry into problems of human bonding. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1997;640:10-25. PMID: 9401599. REVIEW

  25. Davidson (2000): Affective style, psychopathology, and resilience: brain mechanisms and plasticity. Am Psychol. 2000 Nov;55(11):1196-214.

  26. Carlson, Glick (1991): Brain laterality as a determinant of susceptibility to depression in an animal model. Brain Res. 1991 Jun 7;550(2):324-8. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(91)91335-x. PMID: 1884240.

  27. Yazgan, Wexler, Kinsbourne, Peterson, Leckman (1995): Functional significance of individual variations in callosal area. Neuropsychologia. 1995 Jun;33(6):769-79. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00018-x. PMID: 7675166.

  28. Schiffer, Teicher, Papanicolaou (1995): Evoked potential evidence for right brain activity during the recall of traumatic memories. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1995 Spring;7(2):169-75. doi: 10.1176/jnp.7.2.169. PMID: 7626959. n = 20

  29. Teicher, Andersen, Polcari, Anderson, Navalta (2002): Developmental neurobiology of childhood stress and trauma. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2002 Jun;25(2):397-426, vii-viii. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(01)00003-x. PMID: 12136507.

  30. Galin (1974): Implications for psychiatry of left and right cerebral specialization. A neurophysiological context for unconscious processes. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1974 Oct;31(4):572-83. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1974.01760160110022. PMID: 4421063.

  31. Chiron, Jambaque, Nabbout, Lounes, Syrota, Dulac (1997): The right brain hemisphere is dominant in human infants. Brain. 1997 Jun;120 ( Pt 6):1057-65. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.6.1057. PMID: 9217688.

  32. Schore (2000): The self-organisation of the right brain and the neurobiology of emotional development. S. 155 – 185, 156 In: Lewis, Granic (Herausgeber): Emotion, development, and self-organisation.

  33. Brandau (2004): Das ADHS-Puzzle; Systemisch-evolutionäre Aspekte, Unfallrisiko und klinische Perspektiven. Seite 40

  34. Schore (2000): The self-organisation of the right brain and the neurobiology of emotional development. S. 155 – 185, 167 In: Lewis, Granic (Herausgeber): Emotion, development, and self-organisation.