4. Clinical interviews for ADHD diagnosis
Author: Ulrich Brennecke
Review: Dipl.-Psych. Waldemar Zdero (08/2024)
Interviews are questionnaires that are completed by the doctor/therapist conducting the interview. These are usually based very closely on the DSM criteria.1 This narrows down the diagnosis in an unpleasant way, as the DSM and ICD only use a very narrow catalog of symptoms.
Open-ended questions such as “Can you give me an example?” or “Can you give me an example from your everyday life?” are more informative than examples given to the patient to choose from and reduce the likelihood that patients who tend to agree with doctors or who are interested in the diagnosis for other reasons will be misdiagnosed with ADHD by constantly answering in the affirmative (the most serious-sounding answer)2
ADHD-affected adults may answer “yes” or “always” to ongoing immediate responses to the most severe symptoms. If attention problems result from other causes, people with ADHD seem to think longer about whether they are experiencing the symptom and may ask for clarification2
For patients who are unsure of themselves, it can be helpful to ask how their partner or friends would answer these questions for the patient. Most patients with ADHD are very aware of the feedback they have received from their family and close friends.2
- 1. Clinical interviews with test subjects
- 2. Clinical interviews with third parties about test subjects
- 3. Clinical interviews by age group
- 3.3. Interviews / instruments for adults
- 4. Live interviews compared to video testing
1. Clinical interviews with test subjects
| Name of the instrument / test | Test type | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Target group / special features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DISC-5 (Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children)3 | Interview | 80.8 % (parents), 82.8 % (adolescents) | 71.6 % (parents), 65 % (adolescents) | children; parent report. DISADVANTAGE: German version NOT SUFFICIENT TO DESCRIBE STIMULANCIES, as it has not yet been validated in German |
| DIVA 2.0 (Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in Adults) | Interview, adults, n = 108, Petterson et al., 20184 | 90 % | 72.9 % | PPV: 80.6 %; NPV: 85.4 %; accuracy: 82.4 %, AUC: 82.8 % |
| DIVA 2.0 + CPT (combination with performance tests)5 | Interview + performance test | 90 % | 83.3 % | Adults; combination increases specificity |
| IDA-R | ASRS-6 + IDA interview + WURS-K, Retz et al, 2013{Retz W, Retz-Junginger P, Römer K, Rösler M (2013): Standardized scales for the structured diagnosis of ADHD in adults [Standardized psychopathological rating scales for the diagnosis of ADHD in adults]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2013 Jul;81(7):381-9. German. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1335740. PMID: 23856943. REVIEW}} | Interview part: Cut-off 6: 91 %; Cut-off 7: 79 % | Interview part: Cut-off 6: 85 %; Cut-off 7: 99 % | |
| Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Present Lifetime Version6 | semi-structured interview | 86 % | 80 % | Questionnaires for parents and teachers; false-positive rate 20 %, false-negative rate 14 % |
Clinical expert scales:7
- IDA-R (Integrated Diagnostics of Adult ADHD, revised version)
- Standardized diagnostic guide that draws on existing instruments8
- Step 1: ASRS as screening
- Step 2: ADHD symptoms in childhood
- Unlike WURS-k, uses not only self-reporting, but also third-party anamnestic information
- IDA is based on the 5 ADHD core symptom items of the WURS-k with the highest discriminatory power (between 0.52 and 0.60):
- Concentration problems
- Fidgety/nervous
- Loss of self-control
- Low stamina
- Inattentive/dreamy
- Characteristics that indicate frequently occurring oppositional and emotional disorders in children and that show high discriminatory power values (0.53 to 0.61) are recorded by IDA but not included in the evaluation
- Strong mood swings/moody
- Disobedient/rebellious/rebellious
- Tendency to be or act unreasonably
- Cutoff8
- At 6 or higher: specificity of 85 % (15 % are detected although not given) and sensitivity of 91 % (9 % are incorrectly not detected) (recommended; is nevertheless stricter than WURS-K with more incorrect non-detection of child ADHD symptoms)
- At 7 or higher: specificity at over 99 % (1 % are detected although not given), sensitivity at 79 % (21 % are incorrectly not detected)
-
- Step: Diagnosis of acute symptoms according to DSM / ICD
- Semi-standardized interview
- Finding symptoms
- Identification of restrictions in several areas of life
- AD-H-D test system: Attention and hyperactivity deficit disorder questionnaire test9
- Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale (BAARS-IV) against Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in Adults 2.0 (DIVA-2) in n = 390 male prison inmates in England10
- Sensitivity: 37.9 %
- Specificity: 96.3 %
- Before School Functioning Questionnaire (BSFQ)11
- Clinical Assessment of Attention Deficit-Adult12
- NI scale, cut-off 51: sensitivity 30 %, specificity 90 %
- IF scale, cut-off 4: sensitivity 18 %, specificity 90 %
- PI scale, cut-off 27: sensitivity 36 %, specificity 90 %
- Conners 3-Parent Short Form, C 3-P(S)13
- Conners 3-Teacher Short Form, C 3-T(S)13
- Conners Early Childhood14
- Diagnostic checklist (ADHD-DC) for adults15
- Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in Adults 2.0 (DIVA-2)
- DIVA 5
- Validity Korean version:16
- Diagnostic accuracy: 92 %
- Sensitivity: 91.30 %
- Specificity: from 93.62 %
- Validity Korean version:16
- Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI-Plus): ADHD module
- Validity in patients with substance use disorders (SUD) compared to the Conners’ Adult ADHD Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV (CAADID):17
- Sensitivity: 74 %
- Specificity 91 %
- Positive predictive value: 60 %
- Negative predictive value 96 %
- Kappa: 0.60
- Validity in patients with substance use disorders (SUD) compared to the Conners’ Adult ADHD Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV (CAADID):17
- Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition18
- The combination of four item subgroups (listening and paying attention, expressing complex ideas, social communication and following instructions) classified children with ADHD with
- Sensitivity: 87.5 %
- Specificity: 87.5 %
- Only reading skills, writing skills and time and data distinguished children with specific learning disabilities from controls
- The combination of four item subgroups (listening and paying attention, expressing complex ideas, social communication and following instructions) classified children with ADHD with
- Wender-Reimherr Interview (WRI)
Mixture of neuropsychological test and external assessment scales:
- Quantitative Behavior Test (QbTest); manufacturer: qbtech192021
- A combination of CPT and motion analysis using an infrared measuring system22
- 70% accuracy in adults aged 55 to 79 years
- In combination with the self-reported severity of ADHD symptoms 91 % accuracy
- Two versions:
- QbTest
- Children aged 7 to 12 years
- Simple target recognition task (“Go/No-Go”); each time a circle appears on the screen, the respondent should press a hand-responder button, but not react if a cross appears in front of the circle. Similar to the Conners CPT due to the inhibitory component
- QbTest+
- From 12 years
- Working memory component, similar to the A-X CPT. Subjects observe blue and red squares and circles appearing one after the other. They are asked to react when two consecutive symbols match in color and shape.
- Physical activity component during the CPT is measured with an infrared camera that measures the movement of a reflector in the center of the subject’s forehead
- QbTest
2. Clinical interviews with third parties about test subjects
| Name of the instrument / test | Test type | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Target group / special features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAPA (Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment), structured diagnostic interview of parents of preschool children, Persian version | for DSM 5, Hassanzadeh et al., 202123 | 92 % at cut-off 21.5 | 0.1 % at cut-off 21.5 | PPV: 95.83 %, NPV: 98.91 %, overall diagnostic accuracy = 98.67 % |
| PICS (Parent Interview for Child Symptoms) with Teacher Telephone Interview (TTI)24 | semi-structured interview | 91.8 % | 70.7 % | children |
3. Clinical interviews by age group
3.1. Observation tools for preschool children
- Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function in Preschool (BRIEF-P)25
3.2. Interviews / instruments with schoolchildren / adolescents
- Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-IV)26
Recording period 6 months - Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA-R)27
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment (CAPA)28
Recording period 6 months - Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (K-SADS)29
- Childrens Interview for Psychiatric Syndromes (ChIPS)30
- Swanson, Nolan and Pelham-IV (SNAP IV)
- Scale for recording current symptoms of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and oppositional defiant disorder according to DSM IV (ADHD-ODD scale)33
- According to Kiddie-Sads-Present and Lifetime Version, K-SADS-PL
- DIVA is also suitable for diagnosing adolescents aged 12 to 17. See below.
3.3. Interviews / instruments for adults
3.1. Tests for ADHD symptoms in adulthood
- Diagnostic Interview for ADHD in adults (DIVA)34
- Current: DIVA 5
- DIVA 5 is not yet medically validated in the German translation
- Diagnoses that use DIVA 5 alone therefore lead to recourse risks for doctors and psychologists when billing health insurance companies for treatments based on them
- Time required: 1 - 1.5 hours
- Download for 10 € possible35
- However, the DIVA 5 evaluation differentiates according to age:
- Children between 5 and 12 years: ADHD (+), if:
- at least 6 symptoms either
- Of inattention (6 in total) or
- Hyperactivity/impulsivity (6 in total) or
- Of both inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity (12 in total) are present.
- at least 6 symptoms either
- Adolescents between the ages of 12 and 17: ADHD (+) if
- At least 6 symptoms either
- Of inattention (6 in total) or
- Hyperactivity/impulsivity (6 in total) or
- Of both inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity (12 in total).
- And in addition at least 3 symptoms (of these or others) occurred before the age of 12 years
- At least 6 symptoms either
- Adults: ADHD (+), if
- At least 3 symptoms of inattention or hyperactivity/impulsivity before the age of 12 years
- And additionally at least 5 symptoms of either inattention (5 in total) or hyperactivity/impulsivity (5 in total) or both (10 in total)
- Children between 5 and 12 years: ADHD (+), if:
- However, the DIVA 5 evaluation differentiates according to age:
- Current: DIVA 5
- Homburg ADHD Scales for Adults (HASE)
HASE consists of five individual procedures3637- Wender Utah Rating Scale - German short form (WURS-K)
- Objective: retrospective diagnosis of childhood ADHD-HI symptoms38
- Problematic:
- Refers to ages 8 to 10 years. Must be adapted to the age of 6 to 11 years.
- Questions are artificially changed so that it remains chargeable. However, this has actually made it worse.
- Inattention is poorly assessed, ADHD-I in girls and boys is often overlooked.
- AUC only 86 %:
- Better alternative: WURS-25: Comprehensive, 96 % AUC, free of charge
- Problematic:
- Method: Self-assessment
- Time required: 10 - 15 min.
- Objective: retrospective diagnosis of childhood ADHD-HI symptoms38
- ADHD self-assessment scale (ADHD-SB)
- Objective: To measure the 18 diagnostic criteria of DSM-IV and ICD-10.
- Method: Self-assessment
-Time required: 10 - 15 min.
- ADHD Diagnostic Checklist (ADHD-DC)
- External assessment scale for experts based on DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria
- Method: External assessment
- Time required: 10 - 15 min.
- Wender Reimherr Interview (WRI)
- structured interview with 28 psychopathological characteristics that are particularly important for the diagnosis of ADHD in adults
- Wender-Reimherr interview is criticized for underestimating the symptoms of the predominantly inattentive presentation form (ADHD-I)39
- Method: Interview
- Time required: 25 - 35 min.
- Wender-Reimherr self-assessment for adult ADHD (WR-SB)
- new self-assessment scale for ADHD in adults
- Method: Self-assessment
- Time required: 30 - 45 min.
- Wender Utah Rating Scale - German short form (WURS-K)
- Integrated Diagnosis of ADHD in Adults“ (IDA-R) test system40
IDA-R summarizes relevant self-assessment and external assessment instruments to enable a time-efficient and reliable diagnosis based on the current DSM standard. It is available as a print and online version.
IDA-R consists of a training video and 3 tests:- ASRS of the WHO (not actually a diagnostic tool, but a screening tool with 6 questions)
- Validated short form of the Wender-Utah Rating Scale (WURS-K) for the retrospective assessment of ADHD symptoms in childhood (see above for problems) and
- A diagnostic interview based on the latest DSM criteria to assess the current symptoms
- Available free of charge from Medice (manufacturer of Medikinet) for doctors and psychotherapists
4. Live interviews compared to video testing
Live interviews and video interviews showed no differences in the results.41
Steinhausen in Steinhausen, Rothenberger, Döpfner (2010): Handbuch ADHS, Kohlhammer, Seite 30 ↥
Mierau SB (2025): Do I Have ADHD? Diagnosis of ADHD in Adulthood and Its Mimics in the Neurology Clinic. Neurol Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;15(1):e200433. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200433. PMID: 39697479; PMCID: PMC11655167. ↥ ↥ ↥
Bitsko RH, Holbrook JR, Fisher PW, Lipton C, van Wijngaarden E, Augustine EF, Mink JW, Vierhile A, Piacentini J, Walkup J, Firchow B, Ali AR, Badgley A, Adams HR (2023): Validation of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-5) Tic Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Modules. Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2023;9(2):231-244. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2023.2191352. PMID: 38883232; PMCID: PMC11177540. ↥
Pettersson R, Söderström S, Nilsson KW (2018): Diagnosing ADHD in Adults: An Examination of the Discriminative Validity of Neuropsychological Tests and Diagnostic Assessment Instruments. J Atten Disord. 2018 Sep;22(11):1019-1031. doi: 10.1177/1087054715618788. PMID: 26681530. n = 108 ↥
Pettersson R, Söderström S, Nilsson KW (2018): Diagnosing ADHD in Adults: An Examination of the Discriminative Validity of Neuropsychological Tests and Diagnostic Assessment Instruments. J Atten Disord. 2018 Sep;22(11):1019-1031. doi: 10.1177/1087054715618788. PMID: 26681530. ↥
Coghill D, Du Y, Jiang W, Xian, Lu D, Qian Y, Mulraney M, Su L (2022): A novel school-based approach to screening for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;31(6):909-917. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01721-w. PMID: 33515089. ↥
Rösler, Retz (2020): Medikamentöse Therapie der ADHS bei Erwachsenen; Psychiatrie up2date 2020; 14: 59–75 ↥
Retz W, Retz-Junginger P, Römer K, Rösler M (2013): Standardisierte Skalen zur strukturierten Diagnostik der ADHS im Erwachsenenalter [Standardised psychopathological rating scales for the diagnosis of ADHD in adults]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2013 Jul;81(7):381-9. German. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1335740. PMID: 23856943. REVIEW ↥ ↥
Sponsel, 2002 ↥
Young, González, Mutch, Mallet-Lambert, O’Rourke, Hickey, Asherson, Gudjonsson (2016): Diagnostic accuracy of a brief screening tool for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in UK prison inmates. Psychol Med. 2016 May;46(7):1449-58. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716000039. PMID: 26867860. n = 390 ↥
Faraone, DeSousa, Komolova, Sallee, Incledon, Wilens (2019): Functional Impairment in Youth With ADHD: Normative Data and Norm-Referenced Cutoff Points for the Before School Functioning Questionnaire and the Parent Rating of Evening and Morning Behavior Scale, Revised. J Clin Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 10;81(1). pii: 19m12956. doi: 10.4088/JCP.19m12956. ↥
Finley JA, Cerny BM, Brooks JM, Obolsky MA, Haneda A, Ovsiew GP, Ulrich DM, Resch ZJ, Soble JR (2024): Cross-validating the Clinical Assessment of Attention Deficit-Adult symptom validity scales for assessment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2024 Mar;46(2):111-123. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2023.2283940. PMID: 37994688. ↥
Gomez, Vance, Watson, Stavropoulos (2019): ROC Analyses of Relevant Conners 3-Short Forms, CBCL, and TRF Scales for Screening ADHD and ODD. Assessment. 2019 Sep 19:1073191119876023. doi: 10.1177/1073191119876023. ↥ ↥
Türk, Harbarth, Bergold, Steinmayr, Neidhardt, Kamp-Becker, Equit, Wunsch, Christiansen (2020): Do German Children Differ? A Validation of Conners Early Childhood™. J Atten Disord. 2020 Mar 14:1087054720907955. doi: 10.1177/1087054720907955. PMID: 32172644. ↥
Rösler M, Retz W, Retz-Junginger P, Thome J, Supprian T, Nissen T, Stieglitz RD, Blocher D, Hengesch G, Trott GE (2004): Instrumente zur Diagnostik der Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung (ADHS) im ErwachsenenalterSelbstbeurteilungsskala (ADHS-SB) und Diagnosecheckliste (ADHS-DC) [Tools for the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults. Self-rating behaviour questionnaire and diagnostic checklist]. Nervenarzt. 2004 Sep;75(9):888-95. German. doi: 10.1007/s00115-003-1622-2. Erratum in: Nervenarzt. 2005 Jan;76(1):129. PMID: 15378249. ↥
Hong M, Kooij JJS, Kim B, Joung YS, Yoo HK, Kim EJ, Lee SI, Bhang SY, Lee SY, Han DH, Lee YS, Bahn GH (2020): Validity of the Korean Version of DIVA-5: A Semi-Structured Diagnostic Interview for Adult ADHD. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 Oct 12;16:2371-2376. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S262995. PMID: 33116536; PMCID: PMC7567566. ↥
Palma-Álvarez RF, Barta C, Carpentier PJ, Carruthers S, Crunelle CL, Demetrovics Z, Dom G, Faraone SV, Franck J, Johnson B, Kapitány-Fövény M, Kaye S, Konstenius M, Matthys F, Moggi F, Møller M, Schellekens A, Skutle A, van de Glind G, van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen K, Verspreet S, Schoevers RA, Wallhed S, Levin FR, Grau-López L, Casas M, van den Brink W, Ramos-Quiroga JA; IASP Research Group (2023): Validity of the ADHD module of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview PLUS for screening of adult ADHD in treatment seeking substance use disorder patients: ADHD screening with MINI-Plus. Span J Psychiatry Ment Health. 2023 Jan-Mar;16(1):11-15. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2020.04.013. PMID: 32561156. ↥
Balboni G, Incognito O, Belacchi C, Bonichini S, Cubelli R (2017): Vineland-II adaptive behavior profile of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder or specific learning disorders. Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Feb;61:55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.12.003. PMID: 28056381. ↥
Bijlenga, Ulberstad, Thorell, Christiansen, Hirsch, Kooij (2019): Objective assessment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in older adults compared with controls using the QbTest. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 26. doi: 10.1002/gps.5163. ↥
Hall, Brown, James, Martin, Brown, Selby, Clarke, Williams, Sayal, Hollis, Groom (2019): Consensus workshops on the development of an ADHD medication management protocol using QbTest: developing a clinical trial protocol with multidisciplinary stakeholders. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 18;19(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0772-2. ↥
Tomlinson E, Owen-Smith A, Benavente M, Cooper C, Jones HE, Ward M, Walker JG, Wang H, Lopez Manzano C, Hank D, Welton NJ, Leeflang M, Whiting P (2025): QbTest for ADHD assessment and medication management: a mixed-methods systematic review of impact on clinical outcomes and patient, carer and clinician experiences. BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 17;15(4):e095479. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095479. PMID: 40246562; PMCID: PMC12007030. ↥
Buitelaar J, Bölte S, Brandeis D, Caye A, Christmann N, Cortese S, Coghill D, Faraone SV, Franke B, Gleitz M, Greven CU, Kooij S, Leffa DT, Rommelse N, Newcorn JH, Polanczyk GV, Rohde LA, Simonoff E, Stein M, Vitiello B, Yazgan Y, Roesler M, Doepfner M, Banaschewski T (2022): Toward Precision Medicine in ADHD. Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Jul 6;16:900981. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.900981. PMID: 35874653; PMCID: PMC9299434. REVIEW ↥
Hassanzadeh M, Malek A, Norouzi S, Amiri S, Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Shahriari F, Egger HL, Small B (2021): Psychometric properties of the Persian version of preschool age psychiatric assessment (PAPA) for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Based on DSM-5. Asian J Psychiatr. 2021 Apr;58:102618. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102618. PMID: 33652288. ↥
Parker A, Corkum P (2016): ADHD Diagnosis: As Simple As Administering a Questionnaire or a Complex Diagnostic Process? J Atten Disord. 2016 Jun;20(6):478-86. doi: 10.1177/1087054713495736. PMID: 23887860. ↥
Bausela-Herreras E, Alonso-Esteban Y, Alcantud-Marín F (2023): Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function in Preschool (BRIEF-P) and Attention-Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders (ADHD): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Floor and Ceiling Effects. Children (Basel). 2023 Dec 30;11(1):58. doi: 10.3390/children11010058. PMID: 38255370; PMCID: PMC10814211. ↥
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/limited_access/interviewer_manual.pdf ↥
Reich (2000): Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry; Volume 39, Issue 1, January 2000, Pages 59-66; https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200001000-00017 ↥
Angold, Prendergast, Cox, Harrington, Simonoff, Rutter (1995): The Child and Adolescent Pschiatric Assessment (CAPA). ↥
http://www.psychiatry.pitt.edu/sites/default/files/Documents/assessments/ksads-pl.pdf, nicht mehr online ↥
WELLER, WELLER, FRISTAD, MARIJO, ROONEY, SCHECTER (2000): Children’s Interview for Psychiatric Syndromes (ChIPS); Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry; Volume 39, Issue 1, January 2000, Pages 76-84; Author links open overlay panelhttps://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200001000-00019 ↥
Coghill, Chen, Silva (2019): Organizing and delivering Treatment for ADHD in: Rohde, Buitelaar, Gerlach, Faraone (2019) (Hrsg): The World federation of ADHD – Guide ↥
Hohage (2012): Überprüfung der Eignung des Kiddie-SADS-Interviews zur dimensionalen Erfassung der externalen Symptomatik bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung – Eine empirische Untersuchung. Dissertation. Seite 15 ↥
Hohage (2012): Überprüfung der Eignung des Kiddie-SADS-Interviews zur dimensionalen Erfassung der externalen Symptomatik bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung – Eine empirische Untersuchung. Dissertation. Seite 58 ↥
Roy (2023) Grundlagen des Krankheitsbilds & der Diagnostik der ADHS. Onlinefortbildung ↥
Kurzanleitung Leitfaden zur Verwendung der Wender-Utah-Rating-Scale-Kurzform, WURS-k ↥
Semmler: ADHS-Testverfahren im Test. Letzter Aufruf 25.09.24. ↥
McDermott SM, Sweeney K, Jacobson LA, Lieb RW, Wexler D, Pritchard AE (2022): Does Assessment Format Matter? A Comparison of In-Person Versus Teletesting Scores for Youth with ADHD. J Atten Disord. 2022 Oct 14:10870547221129311. doi: 10.1177/10870547221129311. PMID: 36239432. n = 896 ↥