MPH Part 2 - Mechanism of Action
2. How Methylphenidate Works
Implications for People with ADHD
Methylphenidate (MPH) primarily affects the neurotransmitters dopamine and norepinephrine. It blocks the transporters that reabsorb these neurotransmitters back into the nerve cells (reuptake inhibition). As a result, more dopamine and norepinephrine remain active outside the nerve cells. This effect is most pronounced in the striatum. In the prefrontal cortex, MPH simultaneously increases dopamine levels by inhibiting the norepinephrine transporter. However, the statement that MPH increases dopamine is only partially correct. The baseline firing rate of dopamine neurons does not increase, and brief dopamine spikes were even reduced in several studies. MPH has barely any effect on serotonin. A euphoric experience occurred with a rapid rise in dopamine following injection, but not after oral administration of standard therapeutic doses.
The effect depends on the dose and the individual’s initial condition. Low and high doses may have opposite effects. With prolonged use, the number of dopamine transporters may increase. For some patients, the dose may need to be adjusted slightly once after a certain period of time. No general loss of efficacy has been reported.
In the brain, MPH reduced abnormalities in the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia in many studies. In several studies, it normalized abnormal connections between brain regions, bringing them in line with those of people without ADHD. On EEG, MPH frequently increased the P3, a brainwave response to stimuli. It remains unclear whether such measurements are suitable for predicting response in individual cases.
In children with ADHD, MPH shifted underactivation of the autonomic nervous system toward the levels seen in unaffected individuals. Heart rate and blood pressure increased without clinically relevant changes in the ECG. MPH appears to have little or no effect on the stress hormone cortisol; testosterone levels did not change. Findings regarding oxidative stress, inflammatory markers, and sleep are inconsistent. MPH brought pain sensitivity—which is altered in ADHD—in line with that of healthy individuals. In preschoolers, MPH reduced symptoms with moderate to large effects, though the quality of evidence was low. Preschoolers cleared MPH from their systems more slowly than school-aged children.
Much of the detailed evidence in this section comes from animal studies—often involving doses significantly higher than those used in treatment—or from small studies. Its applicability to people with ADHD is limited.
The first computer models capable of realistically simulating the effects of ADHD medications are now available. A computer model for simulating type 1 diabetes has already been approved by the FDA as a substitute for preclinical animal studies. (validation study, n = 24, Phase 2b)1
A model comparing MPH and lisdexamfetamine in 2,600 virtual children, adolescents, and adults with ADHD (with and without comorbidities) took into account the effects on proteins involved in ADHD. (In silico study, N = 2,600 virtual patients, manufacturer-funded, author(s) employed by the manufacturer, E 2b.)2
2.1. Effect on Neurotransmitters
MPH alters neurotransmitter levels in the brain.
2.1.1. MPH Increases Dopamine
Implications for People with ADHD
Methylphenidate (MPH) increases the amount of dopamine outside the nerve cells (extracellular dopamine). The primary mechanism is the blockade of the dopamine transporter (DAT). This transporter normally recycles dopamine back into the nerve cell (reuptake). At typical doses, a large proportion of these transporters are occupied. MPH is most potent in the striatum, a region of the brain with a particularly high density of dopamine transporters. In the prefrontal cortex (PFC), which is important for planning and control, MPH has been shown to be effective even at low doses in animal studies.
The claim that MPH increases dopamine is too sweeping. A distinction must be made between steady baseline activity (tonic) and brief dopamine surges, such as those triggered by an unexpected reward (phasic). MPH does not increase the tonic firing of dopamine neurons, but only the dopamine levels outside the cells (extracellular). In several studies, these phasic dopamine surges were reduced, while in others they remained unchanged or were even enhanced. The findings in this regard are inconsistent.
Other mechanisms are under discussion. These include dopamine efflux via the transporter, release from storage vesicles at very high doses, redistribution of the vesicular transporter VMAT2, and effects on the dopamine-synthesizing enzyme tyrosine hydroxylase. It is not clear whether MPH actually increases dopamine production.
A “high” occurs only when there is a rapid and sharp rise in dopamine levels—for example, after injecting high doses—but not after taking medication orally. This is not dangerous either—in medicine, it is the dose that makes the poison.
The effect depends on the dose. Low and high doses of the medication can have opposite effects. An individual’s baseline dopamine levels also influence how much someone benefits from MPH. With long-term use, the number of dopamine transporters may increase. For some patients, the dose may need to be adjusted slightly once after some time. However, there are no reports of a general loss of efficacy.
Many of the findings come from animal studies involving rats and mice or from imaging studies of healthy individuals. Their applicability to people with ADHD is limited.
2.1.1.1. MPH increases extracellular dopamine and may reduce phasic dopamine
Implications for People with ADHD
It is often stated in general terms that MPH increases dopamine and norepinephrine. That oversimplifies the issue. A distinction must be made between dopamine levels outside the nerve cells (extracellular), the steady baseline release (tonic), and brief bursts of dopamine in response to unexpected rewards (phasic). Furthermore, MPH has different effects in different regions of the brain.
Animal studies found that low-dose MPH acted primarily in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the hippocampus in rodents. In monkeys, dopamine levels also increased in the striatum. The results vary depending on the animal species, dose, and measurement method.
MPH increases extracellular dopamine levels, particularly in the striatum and likely also in the PFC. This is primarily because dopamine is reuptaken into the cell more slowly. However, this does not increase the tonic firing of the dopamine neurons themselves.
Phasic dopamine surges were reduced in several studies. Other studies found no change or an increase. It remains unclear which factors (such as dose or dopamine transporter sensitivity) are responsible. An elevated baseline level combined with reduced dopamine surges is consistent with the hypothesis that ADHD is characterized by too low a tonic dopamine level and too high a phasic dopamine level.
Measurements in humans (PET) showed that the increase in dopamine depended on the situation. It occurred during a rewarded task but not during a neutral one. The experience of a “high” depended on the rate of the increase. In one study, women showed a greater increase in dopamine in the ventral striatum than men. In untreated adults with ADHD, the increase in dopamine in the caudate nucleus was smaller than in control subjects.
Electrophysiological animal studies found that stimulants decreased the firing rate of dopaminergic neurons and increased that of certain downstream neurons.
Many sources merely report a general effect on dopamine and norepinephrine.
The blanket statement that MPH increases dopamine levels is ultimately unhelpful, since a distinction must be made between tonic and phasic dopamine release and extracellular dopamine levels, as well as between the effects in different regions of the brain.
Scientific: Animal studies on dopamine and norepinephrine levels following MPH administration in various brain regions
- (E 2b): Increase in dopamine and norepinephrine in the PFC (textbook, E 4)3 * (animal study, rats, E 2b)4 * (animal study, rats, E 2b)5
** (animal study, rats, full text not available to us, E 2b) (animal study, adolescent rats, 4 weeks, E 2b)6 **7- 1.0 mg/kg in rats
- increase extracellular norepinephrine in the hippocampus by 100%
- do not significantly alter dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens (striatum)
- 2.5 mg/kg in rats
- increase extracellular norepinephrine in the hippocampus by 150–175%
- do not significantly alter dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens (striatum).
- 1.0 mg/kg in rats
- In healthy adult rats, MPH increases
- Dopamine in the PFC, striatum, and nucleus accumbens (peak values of 253%, 209%, and 267% of baseline at 3 mg/kg i.p.) and (animal study, rats, author(s) employed by the manufacturer, E 2b.)8
- Highly concentrated ex vivo (100 µM): dopamine efflux in the PFC, partly from noradrenergic terminals (animal study, N = 27, rats, E 2b.)9
- ex vivo at low concentration (10 µM): no dopamine efflux (animal study, N = 27, rats, E 2b.)9
- In mice, chronic administration of 3 mg/kg (21 days) of extracellular dopamine and norepinephrine in the PFC increased (animal study, mice, 21 days, E 2b.)10
- Norepinephrine in the PFC (peak value 199% of baseline at 3 mg/kg i.p.; not measured in the striatum or nucleus accumbens) (animal study, rats; author(s) employed by the manufacturer; E 2b.)8
- Dopamine and norepinephrine in the PFC, but barely in other brain regions (animal study, rats, E 2b)11
- even at low doses of 0.25 mg i.p. per kg
- Dopamine in the PFC, striatum, and nucleus accumbens (peak values of 253%, 209%, and 267% of baseline at 3 mg/kg i.p.) and (animal study, rats, author(s) employed by the manufacturer, E 2b.)8
- In healthy monkeys, MPH caused: (animal study, rhesus monkeys, E 2b)12
- Striatum: low and high doses: consistent increase in dopamine
- PFC: Dopamine levels rise only at high doses
- In mice, a single dose of 3 mg/kg MPH had the same effect as chronic administration (21 days)
- Striatum: no change in extracellular levels of norepinephrine, dopamine, or serotonin (animal study, mice, 21 days, E 2b.)10
In summary, low-dose MPH appears to primarily affect the PFC and the hippocampus in rodents, whereas in primates, it also affects the striatum.
Tonic dopamine mediates the PFC’s regulatory (inhibitory) control over the ventral striatum, thereby inhibiting the striatum’s (phasic) activity. In response to unexpected positive reward stimuli, the striatum fires dopaminergic phasic signals and activates dopaminergic postsynaptic receptors. Tonic control is thus inhibitory and modulates the excitatory phasic firing in response to unexpected positive reward stimuli. (book chapter, full text not available to us, E 4)13
Scientific: Firing Rates and Oscillations in the Globus Pallidus and Substantia Nigra Under the Influence of Stimulants
Stimulants: (animal study, rats, E 2b.)14
- increased the firing rate of postsynaptic neurons in the globus pallidus and decreased the firing rate of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta, without a preferential effect on presynaptic autoreceptors
- shortened the duration of postsynaptic multisecond oscillations in the globus pallidus from about 30 seconds to 5 to 10 seconds. Even 1.0 mg/kg of MPH or 0.2 mg/kg of D-Amp was effective in this regard.
- However, 0.2 mg/kg of D-Amp showed only a slight presynaptic effect. D-Amp had a stronger postsynaptic effect.
MPH increases extracellular dopamine and decreases phasic dopamine in the striatum.
This is consistent with Grace’s hypothesis, according to which ADHD is characterized by reduced tonic and increased phasic dopamine. This model is likely to apply, at least, to most cases of ADHD. For more on this, see Dopamine Release (Tonic, Phasic) and Encoding
2.1.1.1.1. MPH increases extracellular dopamine
Implications for People with ADHD
MPH increases the amount of dopamine outside the nerve cells, particularly in the striatum. This is caused by inhibition of dopamine reuptake into the cell and, according to animal studies, an additional efflux of dopamine via the transporter. The firing rate of the dopamine neurons themselves is not increased. Therefore, the statement that MPH increases tonic dopamine is incorrect.
In imaging studies (PET) in humans, dopamine levels increased measurably following standard oral doses. The increase depended on the situation: dopamine levels rose during a rewarded math task but not during a neutral task. Interest in and motivation for the task were higher while taking MPH. A “high” occurred primarily with a rapid rise in dopamine, such as after intravenous administration. In one study, women showed a greater increase in dopamine in the ventral striatum than men. In adolescents with ADHD, the magnitude of the increase correlated with the severity of attention deficits. In untreated adults with ADHD, the increase in the caudate nucleus was smaller than in control subjects.
(E 1b): MPH increases extracellular dopamine (Animal study, mice, E 2b)15 * (Animal study, rats, E 2b)16 * (RCT, n = 20, E 1b)17 , particularly in the striatum (Narrative review, E 4)18 * (Animal study, N = 27, rats, E 2b)*9 , but likely also in the PFC (Animal study, N = 60, SHR rats, 4 weeks, E 2b)19 .
The statement “MPH increases tonic dopamine” would not be correct, however, because MPH does not increase tonic firing itself. Inhibition of reuptake merely leads to an increase in extracellular dopamine levels, not to a change in tonic firing.
The following reasons for the increase in extracellular dopamine caused by MPH were identified:
- inhibition of dopamine reuptake (animal study, mice, E 2b)15
- increased dopamine efflux due to reversal of the dopamine reuptake transporter in the striatum (animal study, N = 27, rats, E 2b)9
In a gambling task, MPH increased the strength of the response and the BOLD signals associated with reward anticipation in the ventral striatum, * (RCT, n = 20, E 1b)*17 suggesting that the striatal tonic dopamine level represents an average reward-expectancy signal that modulates the phasic dopaminergic response to the reward.
(E 2b): MPH increased extracellular dopamine in humans, as measured by reduced binding of D2/3 radioligands in PET, according to:
- oral administration:
- A 20% (± 12) reduction in D2 receptor availability (Bmax/Kd) in the striatum following administration of 0.8 mg/kg (± 0.11) (Single-blind, placebo-controlled PET study, n = 11, Phase 2b.)20
- In the extrastriatal region, the volume of distribution of [11C]FLB 457 was reduced by the following amounts after 40 to 60 mg (mean 0.63 mg/kg): (Double-blind, placebo-controlled PET study, N = 12, n = 10, Phase 2b.)21
- 7.2% in the frontal cortex
- 6.3% in the temporal cortex
- 5.7% in the thalamus
- intravenous administration:
- 24% reduction in [11C]raclopride binding throughout the striatum following administration of 0.25 mg/kg (Open-label PET study, n = 6, E 2b.)22
The extrastriatal binding change correlated with the MPH dose in mg/kg across all regions. (Double-blind, placebo-controlled PET study, N = 12, n = 10, Phase 2b.)21
The increase in dopamine was context-dependent. A 20 mg oral dose of MPH increased extracellular dopamine in the striatum only when combined with a rewarded math task, but not during a neutral task. The math task alone (under placebo) did not increase dopamine. Interest and motivation for the task were higher under MPH and correlated with the increase in dopamine. (Single-blind, placebo-controlled PET study, n = 16, E 2b.)23
(E 1b): The “high” depended on the rate at which dopamine levels rose:
- Intravenous MPH (0.25 mg/kg) increased striatal dopamine significantly faster than oral MPH (60 mg). The shorter the time to peak dopamine levels in the putamen, the stronger the “high” (oral r = −0.76, intravenous r = −0.69). (Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study, n = 20, E 1b.)24
- A rewarding effect occurred only when dopamine levels rose rapidly, such as after intravenous administration of (Review, E 4.)25
- Euphoria correlated with changes in binding in the dorsal striatum (Open-label PET study, n = 6, E 2b.)22
After receiving MPH orally (60 mg) or intravenously (0.5 mg/kg), women showed a significantly greater release of dopamine in the ventral striatum (nucleus accumbens) than men, but not in the dorsal striatum. After oral administration, 83.3% of women and 45% of men reported a noticeable effect. Plasma MPH levels did not account for this difference. Following intravenous administration, these levels were actually higher in men. (Two single-blind, placebo-controlled PET cohorts, n = 95, E 2b.)26
In SHR rats, D-MPH increased norepinephrine efflux in the PFC and dopamine efflux in the striatum in a dose-dependent manner, with the increase in dopamine efflux being approximately twice as great in percentage terms. The rise in norepinephrine was slower and lasted longer. The peak was reached for both transmitters 30 to 60 minutes after administration. At baseline, norepinephrine efflux in the PFC was reduced in SHR rats, whereas striatal and mesolimbic dopamine transmission was hyperactive. (Review, manufacturer-funded, E 4.)27
MPH (10 mg/kg i.p.) increased electrically stimulated dopamine efflux in the dorsal striatum significantly more in periadolescent rats (28 days old) than in adult rats (65 days old); amphetamine (1 mg/kg) did not. Motor activity and stereotypies increased more markedly in adolescents than in adults following administration of dopamine reuptake inhibitors (MPH, GBR12909, nomifensine), but not following administration of dopamine releasers (amphetamine, MDMA). (Animal study, male rats, E 2b.)28
According to a PET study (60 mg orally), MPH blocked dopamine transporters by 60% (± 11) in healthy adults and increased extracellular dopamine by 16% (± 8). The interindividual variability in the increase in dopamine did not correlate significantly with the degree of DAT blockade but was primarily due to differences in dopamine release. (PET, [11C]cocaine and [11C]raclopride, n = 10, healthy subjects, E 2b.)29 Since the released dopamine influences the binding of the radioligand to the D2 receptor, the measurable increase in dopamine depends on the interaction between DAT blockade and endogenous dopamine release.
The striatal dopamine released by oral MPH was distributed differently across regions. Dopamine release in the postcommissural caudate predicted the effect on reversal learning, while release in the ventral striatum predicted the effect on spatial working memory. More impulsive individuals showed greater dopamine release and benefited more. (PET, [11C]Racloprid, healthy subjects, E 2b.)30 More on this finding in section 5.6.
The magnitude of the MPH-induced increase in dopamine in the right striatum ([11C]raclopride-PET following oral administration of 0.3 mg/kg MPH) correlated in untreated adolescents with ADHD with the severity of deficits on the CPT for: (PET study, n = 9, E 3.)31
- Attention r = 0.81
- Impulse control r = 0.68
- Information processing r = 0.66
- Consistency of attention (variability) r = 0.60
In adolescents with ADHD resulting from preterm birth or birth trauma, the MPH-induced decrease in raclopride binding in the striatum correlated positively with commission errors. The authors interpreted this as evidence of low extracellular dopamine concentrations in impulsivity. (PET study, n = 6, E 3.)32
For information on the relationship between MPH-induced increases in dopamine in the ventral striatum and long-term response, see section 5.6.
Intravenous MPH caused a smaller increase in dopamine (a smaller decrease in [11C]raclopride binding) in the left and right caudate nucleus compared to controls (p < 0.05); exploratory findings also showed this in the hippocampus and amygdala (p < 0.001). The attenuated increase in dopamine in the caudate correlated with inattention (p < 0.05) and with greater subjective “drug liking” (p < 0.01). Under placebo conditions, D2/D3 receptor availability in the left caudate was lower in ADHD patients (p < 0.05). (PET study, N = 43, n = 19, single intravenous dose, Day 3.)33
2.1.1.1.2. MPH may reduce phasic dopamine levels
Implications for People with ADHD
Short bursts of dopamine (phasic dopamine), such as those triggered by an unexpected reward, were reduced by MPH in several studies. Other studies found no change. An animal study using a rat model of ADHD found an increase, particularly at low doses. The findings are contradictory. This may depend on factors such as the dose or the sensitivity of the dopamine transporter.
Changes in the storage vesicles of the nerve cell are being discussed as the cause of this reduction. Simply inhibiting reuptake cannot be the reason, since another reuptake inhibitor actually amplified the dopamine surges. One hypothesis suggests that the elevated baseline level reduces the relative strength of the dopamine surges. In an animal study, the dopamine surges remained unchanged, leading to the suspicion of an inhibitory feedback mechanism via D2 autoreceptors. Another animal study, however, found no involvement of these autoreceptors in the reduction.
(E 1b): Several studies found a reduction in phasic dopamine levels due to MPH, (animal study, mice, E 2b)15 * (RCT, n = 20, E 1b)17 However, some studies found no change (animal study, rats, E 2b)16 * (animal study, N = 27, rats, E 2b)9 or an increase. This may depend on the circumstances (e.g., dosage, DAT sensitivity).
Scientific: Mechanism of phasic dopamine reduction (synapsin, D2 autoreceptors, vesicles)
The significant reduction in phasic (synaptic) dopamine release is likely due to a decrease in synapsin phosphorylation (animal study, mice, E 2b)15
The inhibition of phasic dopamine is not a consequence of presynaptic D2 autoreceptor activation, since this (animal study, mice, E 2b)15
- a. even in the presence of the D2 antagonist sulpiride, and
- b. also occurs in DAT-CI striatal slices, in which increased extracellular DA levels cannot activate D2 autoreceptors
The inhibition of phasic dopamine could—as with cocaine—possibly be due to a reduction in synaptic vesicular neurotransmitter. (Animal study, mice, E 2b)15 As a lipophilic weak base, cocaine could cause the vesicular pH gradient to collapse, similar to the “weak base effects” reported for amphetamines, or it could act on the vesicles. There is evidence that synaptic vesicles may be quite “leaky” and constantly lose dopamine into the cytosol. This impression is supported by the effect of reserpine, which can rapidly deplete synaptic vesicles of dopamine.
One study found that MPH did not alter phasic dopamine levels; an inhibitory feedback mechanism via D2 autoreceptors was suspected because a D2 antagonist administered concurrently with MPH caused MPH to also increase phasic dopamine levels. (Animal study, rats, E 2b)16
Acute administration of MPH increased the firing activity of PFC pyramidal neurons in rats and potentiated NMDA-induced neurotransmission (secondary citation from Di Miceli (2022), who referred to their own earlier study). (Animal study, N = 27, rats, E 2b.)9
The DAT blocker nomifensine enhanced the phasic dopaminergic signal (animal study, mice, E 2b)15 , suggesting that dopamine reuptake inhibition alone cannot account for the reduction in phasic dopamine caused by MPH.
A review of animal models supported the hypothesis that stimulants enhance phasic dopamine release. Findings in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats also suggested that psychostimulants reduced hyperactivity not through DAT inhibition, but through inhibition of the norepinephrine and serotonin transporters. (Narrative review, E 4.)34
A hypothesis-based study attributed the reduction in phasic dopamine to the fact that low-dose MPH (0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg) increases resting extracellular dopamine levels several-fold, thereby reducing the relative impulse-triggered release and postsynaptic activation, whereas high doses generally have a stimulating effect. (Hypothesis paper, E 4.)35
In contrast, an animal study found that MPH can increase phasic dopamine. The phasic dopamine signals in response to reward-predicting stimuli were smaller in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR, ADHD model) than in control rats. MPH enhanced stimulus responses more strongly in SHR than in control rats, particularly at low doses. A higher dose increased stimulus and stimulation responses equally in both strains. (Animal study, SHR and Sprague-Dawley rats, in vivo voltammetry, E 2b.)36
2.1.1.1.3. Stimulants alter dopaminergic firing rates
Scientific: Electrophysiological animal studies on the firing rate of dopaminergic and downstream neurons
Stimulants: (Animal study, rats, E 2b.)14
- increased the firing rate of (non-dopaminergic) neurons in the globus pallidus in a dose-dependent manner
- Maximum MPH at 3.2 mg/kg
- Maximum D-AMP at a cumulative dose of 0.8 mg/kg
- reduced the firing rate of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta
- MPH by up to 96%
- D-AMP by up to 99%
(E 2b): MPH inhibits the firing rate of dopaminergic midbrain neurons and, at the same time, reveals a non-dopaminergic excitation mediated by alpha-1 receptors, which becomes apparent after administration of a D2 antagonist. Electrophysiological animal studies found:
- Inhibition of the firing rate in VTA dopamine neurons, which was reversed by the D2 antagonist raclopride and shifted to alpha-1-mediated (prazosin-sensitive) burst activity that was elevated above baseline. At the same time, MPH prolonged the PFC UP state and shifted the functional coupling between the PFC and VTA from negative to positive (D2-mediated). (Animal study, rats, dual-channel recording PFC/VTA, E 2b.)37
- in dopamine neurons, a DA-mediated inhibition of firing rate accompanied by non-DA-mediated excitation with bursting and a 0.5- to 1.5-Hz oscillation, which required alpha-1 receptors and intact forebrain afferents. (Animal study, rats, single-cell recording from the VTA, E 2b.)38
- in VTA dopamine neurons (2 mg/kg i.v.), reduced firing and burst activity, which was reversed by the D2 antagonist eticloprid. Combined, the activity was above baseline and depended on alpha-1 and D1 receptors as well as NMDA transmission. Chronic MPH administration during adolescence attenuated this effect in adulthood. (Animal study, rats, in vivo single-cell recording, full text not available to us, E 2b.)39
- inhibition of spontaneous firing in midbrain dopamine neurons accompanied by hyperpolarization, which was reversed by sulpiride (D2) and decreased following dopamine depletion. The inhibition was thus due to newly synthesized dopamine that had accumulated extracellularly as a result of reuptake inhibition. (Animal study, rats, midbrain sections, E 2b.)40
- a biphasic, dose-dependent effect in the neostriatum. 10 mg/kg MPH decreased the firing rate, while 20 to 25 mg/kg increased it; meanwhile, the substantia nigra pars compacta remained consistently inhibited. All effects were reversible with haloperidol. (Animal study, rats, single-cell recording, E 2b.)41
2.1.1.2. MPH binds to DAT (reuptake inhibition)
Implications for People with ADHD
MPH binds to the dopamine transporter (DAT) and the norepinephrine transporter (NET), thereby inhibiting the reuptake of these neurotransmitters into the nerve cell. According to a review, MPH does not bind to dopamine receptors themselves. The dextrorotatory form (d-MPH) binds most strongly, while the levorotatory form (l-MPH) binds only weakly.
Dopamine transporters are found in particularly high concentrations in the striatum, but are scarce in the prefrontal cortex. Consequently, MPH increases dopamine activity primarily in the striatum. It has not yet been definitively determined which brain region is critical for the therapeutic effect.
The blockade of dopamine transporters is dose-dependent. In humans, typical oral doses blocked a large proportion of dopamine transporters, with half blocked at approximately 0.25 mg/kg. In adults with ADHD and concurrent cocaine dependence, transporter occupancy was lower.
Several studies found an increased density of dopamine transporters in the striatum among untreated adults with ADHD, which decreased significantly with MPH, accompanied by clinical improvement. In a small study, all participants who responded well to MPH exhibited increased transporter availability. In contrast, in another study, transporter availability was increased by 24% after 12 months of treatment. Elevated transporter levels could therefore also be a consequence of treatment and not solely a characteristic of ADHD. Animal studies yielded varying results depending on the model, age, and dose.
Opinions differ on whether the level of bus occupancy is related to the improvement. One study found no association with ADHD symptoms, while another found an association with a decrease in impulsive decisions.
Methylphenidate, as a dopamine reuptake inhibitor, increases dopamine levels in the synaptic cleft. (Textbook, E 4)3 MPH inhibits the dopamine transporter and the norepinephrine transporter (Textbook, E 4)42 From this, one might conclude that the site of action of MPH is where there is a dopamine deficiency. In the mesocortical model of ADHD, this would be the PFC. However, SPECT and PET studies clearly show that MPH primarily increases dopamine activity in the striatum, which argues against the PFC as the (sole) site of action (a finding that correlates with the low DAT levels in the PFC and the high DAT levels in the striatum). Since, according to the mesocortical model of ADHD, dopamine activity in the ventral striatum is elevated, MPH—if it increases activity there—would be more likely to worsen symptoms than to improve them. At low doses, stimulants such as MPH can inhibit phasic dopamine release by strengthening inhibitory tonic control. (Narrative review; full text not available to us; E 4)43 In an fMRI study, however, children with ADHD who were not taking medication showed increased frontal activation and decreased striatal activation, which contradicts the theory of mesocortical deficiency. MPH increased frontal blood flow in children with and without ADHD, but it increased striatal blood flow only in children with ADHD. It therefore remains unclear whether the observed frontal deficits in ADHD reflect a central dysfunction in the PFC or a lack of input from other dopaminergic systems. Since nearly all mental disorders exhibit some degree of frontal dysfunction, it remains unclear whether the etiological deficits in ADHD might not have other causes. (book chapter; full text not accessible to us; E 4)13
Methylphenidate (2 weeks) reduced elevated striatal dopamine transporter densities more significantly in a rat model of the combined-type ADHD (SHR/NCrl) than in a model of the inattentive type (WKY/NCrl), particularly when administered before puberty. (animal study, rats, 2 weeks, E 2b.)44 In contrast, one study found an increase in DAT and D1 receptor binding due to chronic high-dose MPH (3 months) in adolescent rats in several subregions of the basal ganglia, particularly in the caudal portions of the caudate nucleus and the putamen. After one month of abstinence, no differences remained. (animal study, rats, 3 months, E 2b.)45
-
MPH binds to dopamine transporters, which are most densely concentrated in the striatum. The binding of MPH in the cerebellum and hippocampus is less than one-tenth of this. (book chapter; full text not available to us; E 4)46
-
(E 2b): MPH does not bind to dopamine receptors, but primarily to DAT and NET, and to a lesser extent to α-adrenoceptors (Ki 0.86 to 5.6 µM). (Narrative review, E 4.)47 * (In vitro study, rat brain, E 2b)48 (Alternatively: (E 2b): MPH is thought to activate postsynaptic D1 receptors. (Textbook, E 4)3 * (Animal study, adolescent rats, 4 weeks, E 2b)49 )
- d-MPH has the strongest binding affinity, specifically to
- DAT with IC50 = 23 nM, Ki = 161 nM;
- NET with IC50 = 39 nM, Ki = 206 nM
- d/l-MPH racemate binds somewhat less strongly to (Narrative Review, E 4.)47
- DAT with IC50 = 20 nM, Ki = 121 nM
- NET with IC50 = 51 nM, Ki = 788 nM
- l-MPH has the weakest binding affinity, specifically for (Narrative Review, E 4.)47
- DAT with IC50 = 1600 nM, Ki = 2250 nM
- NET with an IC50 greater than 10,000 nM, Ki greater than 10,000 nM
- d-MPH has the strongest binding affinity, specifically to
-
Doses of MPH result in a plasma concentration of approximately 20 to 30 nM, which is sufficient to occupy a significant proportion of the dopamine transporters. This effect is consistent with that of D-AMP. (Narrative review; full text not available to us; E 4)43
-
All MPH responders (12 of 18) showed increased DAT availability in the striatum, while 5 of 6 nonresponders showed decreased availability. (Open-label study, n = 18, 10 weeks, E 3.)50
-
Twelve months of MPH treatment increased striatal DAT availability by 24% in previously untreated adults with ADHD. (Controlled longitudinal study, N = 29, n = 18, 12 months, E 2b.)51
-
54 mg of OROS-MPH administered over 2 weeks accounted for 44% (95% CI 36 to 52%) of the DAT in the caudate nucleus and 36% (95% CI 25 to 47%) in the putamen; in patients with comorbid cocaine dependence, the figures were only 34% (95% CI 27 to 46%) and 31% (95% CI 19 to 47%), respectively. DAT uptake did not correlate with improvement in ADHD symptoms (open-label SPECT study, n = 24, 2 weeks, E 2b.)52
-
otherwise:
- a smaller increase in dopamine and norepinephrine in the striatum (Textbook, E 4)3
- No increase in dopamine in the striatum following MPH administration in DAT(-/-) mice, but an increase was observed in DAT(+/-) and DAT(+/+)-mice (animal study, mice, E 2b)53 Apparently, the level of DAT expression/sensitivity is decisive for the positive or negative modulation of phasic dopamine release. (animal study, mice, E 2b)15
Scientific: DAT blockade, DAT binding, and transporter kinetics in PET, SPECT, in vitro, and animal studies
(E 2b): The DAT blockade caused by MPH is dose-dependent. PET and SPECT studies found:
- in humans (120 minutes after oral administration), a blockade of 12% (SD 4) at 5 mg, 40% (SD 12) at 10 mg, 54% (SD 5) at 20 mg, 72% (SD 3) at 40 mg, and 74% (SD 2) at 60 mg, with a half-maximal blockade at 0.25 mg/kg. (PET, [11C]cocaine, n = 7, healthy subjects, E 2b.)54
- in rats, a decrease in the striatal binding index from 3.5 (± 0.9) to 2.4 (± 0.8) after 3 mg/kg (p = 0.026) and to 1.7 (± 0.6) after 10 mg/kg (p < 0.001). (Animal study, rats, SPECT [123I]FP-CIT, manufacturer-funded, E 2b.)55
The peak brain concentration did not occur until 60 minutes after administration, consistent with the time course of the behavioral effect. This time point was measured in baboons. (PET, [11C]cocaine, n = 7, healthy subjects, E 2b.)54 A review added that therapeutic doses block over 50% of the DAT, only d-threo-MPH binds to the DAT, the peak in the brain is reached after 60 to 90 minutes, and the increase in dopamine depends on the dopamine release rate and age (Older adults showed smaller effects). (Narrative review, E 4.)56
A dose-binding relationship for MPH and cocaine was indistinguishable in animal and human comparisons (approximately 50% DAT binding at 0.25 mg/kg, approximately 80% at 1 mg/kg). At the same occupancy level, MPH increased locomotion to a greater extent. (comparison of animal and human data, mice and PET data, E 2b.)57
In untreated adults with ADHD, striatal DAT binding was elevated and decreased significantly with MPH, accompanied by clinical improvement: (E 2b) - DAT binding 1.43 (± 0.18) compared to controls 1.22 (± 0.06, p < 0.001); under MPH (3 × 5 mg/day) 1.00 (± 0.14, p < 0.001) (SPECT [99mTc]TRODAT-1, n = 17, E 2b.)58
- DAT binding 1.43 (± 0.18) compared to controls 1.22 (± 0.05, p < 0.001); under MPH (3 × 5 mg/day, 4 weeks) 1.02 (± 0.23, p < 0.001) (SPECT [99mTc]TRODAT-1, n = 10, 4 weeks, E 2b.)59
On-MPH reduced striatal DAT binding by 29.9% in boys with ADHD (t = −4.12, p = 0.002). A greater reduction and higher baseline binding were associated with higher symptom ratings without MPH (r = 0.68, p = 0.01, and r = 0.56, p = 0.04, respectively). (Within-subject SPECT [123I]Beta-CIT, n = 13, E 2b.)60 For more on this aspect of responding, see section 5.6.
A longitudinal study using dual-label PET found that, under sustained release MPH administration, there was a reduction in DAT binding in the caudate and putamen and in NET binding in the thalamus and pons. Higher baseline DAT levels in the putamen predicted an improvement in sustained attention. (Longitudinal PET, DAT [18F]FEPE2I and NET [18F]FMeNER-D2, n = 21 pre-treatment, n = 12 post-treatment, E 2b.)61 See sections 5.6 and 2.1.2.2 for more information.
According to an in vitro study, the interaction of MPH with DAT differs from that of cocaine, GBR12909, and amphetamine. MPH and benztropine exhibited reduced affinity for a DAT mutant (S356,359A) in ligand displacement assays, but not in dopamine reuptake inhibition. (In vitro study, COS-7 cells with wild-type and mutant DAT, E 2b.)62
The duration of the psychostimulant effect depended on the duration of binding to the DAT. Slow dissociation from the DAT (slow dissociation) predicted a more prolonged effect in vivo. MPH and cocaine had a shorter duration of action than the S-enantiomers of related compounds. (In vitro and computational study using animal data, mice, E 2b.)63
The reward-enhancing effect of MPH (5 and 10 mg/kg) was abolished in DAT-knockout mice, whereas it occurred in wild-type mice. A very high dose (60 mg/kg) reduced the effect in both groups. This demonstrates the dependence on DAT. (Animal study, DAT knockout and wild-type mice, E 2b.)64
A book chapter review presented DAT as the primary target of MPH and noted that chronic MPH increases DAT expression in animals and humans, suggesting that elevated DAT levels could be a consequence of treatment rather than solely an expression of the pathology. The effects of MPH extend beyond DAT. (Review, book chapter, full text not accessible to us, E 4.)65 For time-dependent increases in DAT, see 2.1.1.10.
An increased DAT density (due to overexpression or intravenous self-administration of MPH in the abuse model) increased the maximum transport rate and correlated with the inhibitory potency of amphetamine and MPH, but not of cocaine (a doubling of the transport velocity tripled the potency). In terms of uptake inhibition, MPH behaved similarly to a releaser. (animal study, rats, fast-scan cyclic voltammetry, E 2b.)66 For more on differences in effects compared to amphetamine, see sections 3 and 2.1.4.
Scientific: DAT binding following intravenous MPH administration
Intravenous MPH was shown to increase dopamine transporter levels in healthy individuals in a dose-dependent manner (secondary citation from Volkow (2002)): (Review, E 4.)25
- 78% (± 11) after 0.5 mg/kg
- 67% (± 3) after 0.25 mg/kg
- 62% (± 13) after 0.1 mg/kg
- 35% (± 5) after 0.025 mg/kg
The dose required to block 50% of the DAT (ED50) was 0.075 mg/kg i.v. Oral MPH at therapeutic doses (0.3 to 0.6 mg/kg) likely occupied more than 50% of the DAT without inducing a “high.” (Review, E 4.)25
In medication-naive adult men with ADHD, striatal DAT binding decreased by 33% in the putamen and by 41% in the caudate nucleus following MPH administration. DAT occupancy in the putamen correlated with a reduction in cognitive impulsivity (delay discounting), but not with a reduction in motor impulsivity (stop-signal reaction time). DAT binding in the caudate did not correlate with either of these measures. (Open-label imaging study, n = 24, E 2b.)67
2.1.1.3. MPH increases dopamine release via DAT (efflux)
Implications for People with ADHD
For a long time, MPH was considered solely a dopamine reuptake inhibitor. This view is now considered outdated. Recent findings suggest that MPH may also cause dopamine efflux via the dopamine transporter. The release of dopamine from storage vesicles is likely to occur only at very high single doses of over 80 mg. Unlike amphetamine, MPH is not transported into the nerve cell and therefore causes, at most, a slight presynaptic release of dopamine.
The findings regarding efflux are primarily based on animal studies using tissue samples with high MPH concentrations. No efflux was observed at lower concentrations. It remains unclear whether this plays a role at typical therapeutic doses in humans.
Chronic administration in rats increased the firing rate of neurons in the prefrontal cortex and reduced sensitivity to dopamine and MPH in the striatum. These changes persisted for 4 weeks after the end of administration. This is consistent with the observation that some patients require a one-time dose adjustment after a few weeks. The study itself does not establish this correlation.
While it was previously assumed that methylphenidate does not cause the release of dopamine, more recent research suggests that
- dopamine efflux from the DAT
- a release of dopamine from vesicles at very high doses.
(E 4): The view that MPH is a pure DA reuptake inhibitor (Narrative review, E 4)68 * (Textbook, E 4)*69 is outdated.
- including the release of dopamine from vesicles (here: reserpine-sensitive granules) (Narrative Review, E 4)70
Scientific: Efflux, vesicular release, and chronic effects in animal studies
-
Unlike amphetamine, methylphenidate is not considered a substrate for transport into the cytoplasm, which is why it causes, at most, a slight presynaptic release of dopamine. (Review, E 4)72
-
Dopamine efflux in rats (ex vivo at 100 µM MPH, but not at 10 µM)
- in the PFC from both dopamine and norepinephrine terminals (animal study, N = 27, rats, E 2b.)9
- in the striatum through the reversal of DAT, which is dependent on sodium and, to some extent, on vesicular integrity (reserpine-sensitive)
- As a result, MPH increases extracellular dopamine levels
-
Increase the firing rate of PFC pyramidal neurons
- following chronic administration (4 mg/kg/day orally for 15 days, measured after a 28-day washout period) in the PFC of rats (measured in vivo) (animal study, N = 27, rats, Category 2b)9
- measured using extracellular electrophysiological single-cell recordings
- Responses to locally applied NMDA remain unchanged
-
Desensitization to both dopamine and MPH in striatal regions
- following chronic administration (4 mg/kg/day orally for 15 days, measured after a 28-day washout period) in the striatum of rats: (animal study, N = 27, rats, E 2b.)9
- Reduced efficacy of extracellular dopamine in modulating NMDA-induced firing activity of medium spiny neurons in the striatum (in vivo, preliminary data)
- reduced MPH-induced dopamine release (ex vivo, 100 µM)
- is consistent with the empirical observation that, when starting treatment, a one-time adjustment of the MPH dose is necessary after a few weeks
(E 2b): MPH increases dopamine release via reuptake-mediated mechanisms and, at high doses, via vesicular mechanisms. A microdialysis study found that after 50 mg/kg MPH, dialysate dopamine levels rose to 430% of baseline. The release was Ca²⁺-dependent and could be inhibited by TTX and reserpine, indicating a vesicular and reuptake-mediated mechanism. (Animal study, rats, microdialysis, E 2b.)73
The release triggered by MPH (1 mg/kg) was dependent on alpha-synuclein. MPH reduced the evoked dopamine overflow only in alpha-synuclein knockout mice, while extracellular dopamine levels increased equally in all strains. Release per pulse decreased in knockout mice and increased in wild-type mice. Reuptake inhibition was alpha-synuclein-independent. (Animal study, wild-type and alpha-synuclein knockout mice, voltammetry and microdialysis, E 2b.)74 This also applies to the modulation of phasic dopamine (2.1.1.1.2).
2.1.1.4. MPH acts on DA via D2 autoreceptors; MPH normalizes TH
Implications for People with ADHD
MPH is thought to reverse the inhibitory effect of presynaptic D2 autoreceptors. These receptors are located on dopamine-releasing neurons and inhibit the release of dopamine from those neurons. However, an animal study found that stimulants did not have a stronger effect on these autoreceptors than on downstream receptors. The significance of the autoreceptors for the effects of MPH is therefore unclear.
In healthy individuals, the effect of MPH on brain metabolism in the frontal and temporal cortex depended on the availability of D2 receptors. When D2 availability was high, metabolism in those areas increased; when it was low, it decreased.
In two ADHD rat models, MPH normalized the levels of tyrosine hydroxylase—the enzyme responsible for dopamine synthesis—regardless of whether baseline levels were low or high. A PET study in adults with ADHD found that MPH increased dopamine levels in all nigrostriatal regions and had a normalizing effect in the left caudate nucleus in individuals with poor attention performance. MPH alone did not alter D2 receptors in rats, but it did so when combined with the antidepressant fluoxetine.
MPH causes disinhibition (removal of inhibition) of presynaptic D2 autoreceptors. (Textbook, E 4)75
Nevertheless, the effect of stimulants at various doses on D2 autoreceptors in rats was no greater than that on postsynaptic heteroreceptors. Stimulants appear to have little effect on the dopamine system via autoreceptors. (Animal study, rats, E 2b)14
In healthy individuals with high D2 receptor availability, MPH increased metabolism in the frontal and temporal cortex, whereas in healthy individuals with low D2 receptor availability, MPH decreased it. In the cerebellum, MPH consistently increased metabolism, while in the basal ganglia, it decreased relative metabolism. (Experimental study, n = 15, E 2b.)76
In children with ADHD, D2 receptor binding was elevated prior to MPH treatment and had normalized after 3 months of treatment (secondary citation via Steinhausen et al. (2010) from Ilgin et al. (2001)). It remained unclear whether this reflected a short-term change in receptor binding caused by MPH or a permanent change in receptor density. (Textbook, E 4.)77
(E 4): Similar findings have been reported with regard to tyrosine hydroxylase. While TH expression is reduced in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR), it is elevated in the Naples high-excitability rat (NHE). Subchronic MPH administration normalized TH expression in both ADHD animal models. (Narrative review, E 4)78 * (Narrative review, E 4)*79
Scientific: D2 Receptor Binding Following MPH and Fluoxetine in Subregions of the Rat Striatum
Methylphenidate in combination with fluoxetine significantly reduced D2 receptors in rats in: (animal study, rats, n = 8 to 9 per group, 4 weeks, E 2b.)49
- dorsal caudate putamen (51.5%)
- dorsolateral caudate-putamen (50.4%)
- ventromedial caudate-putamen (49.1%)
- ventrolateral caudate-putamen (47.7%)
- Nucleus accumbens core (44.8%)
D1R binding remained unchanged. Neither MPH nor fluoxetine alone altered D1R or D2R binding.
In vivo, MPH enhanced hippocampal long-term potentiation via D1 dopamine and beta-adrenergic receptors, predominantly in a D1-dependent manner. (Animal study, mice, free-roaming field potentials, E 2b.)80
A PET study with an MPH crossover design found no difference in D2/3 availability or in the MPH-induced increase in dopamine levels between adults with ADHD and controls. MPH increased dopamine levels in all nigrostriatal regions and normalized the left caudate in individuals with poor attention performance, with a baseline-dependent improvement. The authors emphasized the role of midbrain D2 autoreceptors. (RCT, crossover, PET [18F]fallypride, n = 16 ADHD, n = 16 controls, 0.5 mg/kg oral, E 1b.)81 More on baseline-dependent responding in sections 5.6 and 2.1.1.1.1.
2.1.1.5. MPH Increases DA via VMAT2
Implications for People with ADHD
The vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) transports dopamine and norepinephrine from the interior of the cell into the vesicles of the nerve cell. It is therefore an important regulator of these neurotransmitters. According to a review, MPH does not alter the total amount of VMAT2, but rather its distribution within the neuron. This affects only neurons that utilize monoamines such as dopamine. Animal studies found that MPH caused more dopamine to be stored in the vesicles, thereby increasing its subsequent release. This effect depended on dopamine and muscarinic receptors.
In contrast, other animal studies in adolescent rats found that a single dose reduced VMAT2 levels in the cerebellum, while chronic administration increased them.
According to a review, MPH protects the dopamine system from deterioration by ensuring a supply of dopamine in the vesicles. The risk of neurotoxic side effects is therefore relatively low. In an animal study, pretreatment with MPH prevented methamphetamine-induced persistent damage to the dopamine system. An older textbook account still assumed that MPH has no effect on VMAT.
MPH influences the redistribution of the vesicular monoamine transporter-2 (VMAT-2; Solute Carrier Family 18 Member 2—SLC18A2). VMAT-2 is involved in the sequestration of cytoplasmic dopamine and norepinephrine and is thus an important regulator of neurotransmission. MPH does not affect the total amount of VMAT-2 in presynaptic terminals, but only VMAT-2 transport. (Narrative review with structured search, E 4.)47 In adolescent rats, however, acute MPH administration reduced VMAT2 density in the cerebellum, while chronic administration increased it in the cerebellum (Animal study, adolescent rats, 15 days, E 2b.)82 as well as in the cortex and striatum. (animal study, young rats, 2 weeks, E 2b.)83
MPH has the following effect in monoaminergic neurons (but not in cholinergic, GABAergic, or glutamatergic neurons): (Narrative review with structured search, E 4)47
- Decrease in VMAT-2 immunoreactivity in the membrane-associated fraction
- Increase in the cytoplasmic fraction
- no change in the total synaptosomal pool
MPH thus protects the dopaminergic system from progressive “wear and tear” by ensuring a substantial reserve pool of DA in the presynaptic vesicles. Consequently, there is only a relatively low risk of neurotoxic or neuropsychiatric side effects in clinical practice with MPH. (Narrative review with structured search, E 4)47
According to earlier reports, MPH has no effect on vesicular monoamine transporters (VMAT). (Textbook, E 4)42
Scientific: Animal studies on the redistribution and kinetic upregulation of VMAT2
(E 2b): Several animal studies demonstrate the redistribution and kinetic upregulation of VMAT2 by MPH:
- MPH increased dopamine transport into membrane-associated vesicles despite a decrease in VMAT-2 immunoreactivity (kinetic upregulation), as well as dopamine content and K+-stimulated dopamine release. (Animal study, rats, subcellular fractionation, E 2b.)84
- A single dose of MPH shifted VMAT-2 and vesicles from the synaptosomal membranes into the cytoplasm and increased dopamine transport in both fractions, resulting in higher dopamine content and faster, greater K+-stimulated release. (Animal study, rats, review of authors’ own data, E 2b.)85
- Even low doses of MPH and amphetamine shifted VMAT-2 in the same way as high doses, while vesicular glutamate, acetylcholine, and GABA transporters remained unaffected (selectivity for monoaminergic neurons). (Animal study, rats, subcellular fractionation, E 2b.)86
- MPH increased vesicular dopamine uptake and VMAT-2 binding in a dose- and time-dependent manner. In vitro, MPH (at concentrations equal to or below 1 µM) had no effect, suggesting an in vivo-mediated effect. D1 (SCH23390) and D2 antagonists (Eticloprid) reversed this effect. (Animal study, rats, purified striatal vesicles, E 2b.)87
- MPH increased dopamine transport into membrane-associated vesicles (mimicked by quinpirole, blocked by eticlopride) and K+-stimulated release. Both D2 and muscarinic receptors were required. (Animal study, rats, E 2b.)88
- MPH pretreatment increased vesicular dopamine uptake and VMAT-2 binding and prevented persistent, methamphetamine-induced dopaminergic deficits. (Animal study, rats, E 2b.)89
2.1.1.6. MPH increases tyrosine hydroxylase
Implications for People with ADHD
Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) is the enzyme that determines the rate of dopamine production. An animal study found that MPH (as well as sports) can increase the production of this enzyme. In rats, a low-dose administration before and shortly after birth increased TH levels in the striatum. In cell cultures, only the dextrorotatory form, d-MPH, increased enzyme activity—at concentrations higher than the average blood levels in treated children. It is unclear whether this also occurs in the brain.
The findings are inconsistent. Older animal studies found no increase—or even a decrease—in dopamine production due to MPH. In one study, an increase in the enzyme occurred only following abusive intravenous self-administration. In humans, a PET study of healthy women found reduced dopamine turnover despite a persistently elevated rate of dopamine synthesis. Whether MPH actually increases dopamine production therefore remains unclear.
Variants of the TH gene may influence the response to MPH. So far, only a single gene variant has been studied.
Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) is the rate-limiting enzyme in dopamine synthesis. TH converts tyrosine into the dopamine precursor L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA). MPH thus supports dopamine synthesis.
MPH (like sports) can induce the expression of TH (Animal study, SHR rats, 28 days, E 2b)90 and, when administered at low doses during the prenatal and early childhood periods, increased striatal TH levels in rats (without a dose-response relationship). (Animal study, rats, n = 6 to 7 per group, E 2b.)91
Scientific: In vitro findings, TH polymorphism, and conflicting findings regarding dopamine synthesis
In vitro, d-MPH at concentrations of 100 nmol/l or higher (protein homogenates from rat PC12 cells) tyrosine hydroxylase activity significantly and in a dose-dependent manner up to 100 µmol/l (by 50 to 145% compared to the control). L-MPH or racemic MPH did not increase TH. As the proportion of L-MPH increased, the TH activity induced by d-MPH decreased slightly. (In vitro study, rat PC12 cell homogenates, E 2b.)92
This concentration was higher than the mean plasma levels of 42.5 nmol/L observed in children receiving less than 0.7 mg/kg of OROS-MPH. It is unclear whether the increase occurs only peripherally or also in the brain. (Narrative review, E 4.)93 TH gene variants appear to influence the response to MPH. To date, only one TH polymorphism (rs2070762) has been studied. Carriers of the C/C genotype responded less well to MPH (OR 4.34, CI 1.54 to 12.2, secondary citation from Stevens 2019). (Narrative review, E 4.)93
There is no consensus on whether MPH actually increases dopamine synthesis. An [18F]FDOPA-PET study found a 22% reduction in dopamine turnover (kloss) in the putamen following MPH administration (p = 0.003), while at the same time, following a single dose, an 18% increase in the dopamine synthesis rate was observed at the follow-up measurement, indicating a sustained effect (K). The change observed by kloss correlated with the change in cognition. ([18F]FDOPA PET, n = 20, healthy women, 0.5 mg/kg orally, E 2b.)94 For long-term effects, see 2.1.1.10.
In contrast, older animal studies found no increase or a decrease in dopamine synthesis due to MPH:
- Cocaine and MPH reduced DOPAC efflux and the rate of dopamine synthesis in the striatum (pure reuptake inhibition), unlike d-amphetamine (biphasic, release). (Animal study, rats, DOPA accumulation and DOPAC efflux, E 2b.)95
- Systemic amphetamine reduced dopamine synthesis in a dose-dependent manner (ED50: d-amphetamine 1.1, l-amphetamine 3.5 mg/kg), whereas MPH did not alter dopamine synthesis despite producing comparable stereotypies. In vitro, MPH partially activated synthesis but did not reverse the inhibition caused by reserpine. (Animal study, rats, synaptosomes, E 2b.)96
In a voltammetry study, an increase in tyrosine hydroxylase occurred only after intravenous self-administration of MPH (abuse model), along with elevated DAT levels, increased dopamine uptake, and dopamine release. Cocaine had the opposite effect. (Animal study, rats, voltammetry, nucleus accumbens, E 2b.)97
2.1.1.7. MPH acts through L-DOPA receptors
The L-DOPA receptor GPR143 appears to be involved in the acute and chronic effects of MPH.
Although MPH increased dopamine release, it did not affect L-DOPA release from the dorsolateral striatum. Nevertheless, in L-DOPA receptor KO mice (mice with a defect in the Gpr143 L-DOPA receptor gene), the following was reduced: (animal study, mice, Gpr143 knockout, E 2b)98
- MPH-induced hyperlocomotion
- the reward effect
- MPH-induced c-fos expression.
2.1.1.8. MPH alters the D1R-to-D2R/D3R ratio in the frontoparietal region
Implications for People with ADHD
Dopamine acts through various receptor types, primarily D1- and D2-like receptors. The ratio of these receptors to one another may help determine the extent to which a person benefits from MPH. A PET study in healthy individuals found that people with relatively more D2/D3 receptors in the caudate nucleus benefited more from a single dose of MPH than those with relatively more D1 receptors. The receptor ratio could therefore serve as a biomarker for response to MPH. The increase in dopamine in the striatum, however, was not associated with improved performance.
Further studies by the same research group found associations between the availability of D1 and D2 receptors and the effects of MPH on brain activity, cortical connectivity, and attention. These studies involved healthy participants. It remains unclear whether the results can be generalized to people with ADHD.
In rats, high-dose MPH administered over 3 months increased D1 receptor binding. After one month without MPH, this difference was no longer present.
A PET study involving 37 healthy participants found: (Single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, n = 37, E 2a)99
Increased attentional and working memory load heightened the activity of a network comprising the lateral frontoparietal and visual cortices, correlating with the performance improvement induced by MPH.
A lower D1R-to-D2R/D3R ratio in the dorsomedial caudate correlated with reduced frontoparietal activity during sustained attention and a greater improvement in brain function and task performance following MPH administration, and could therefore serve as a biomarker for response to MPH.
The increase in striatal dopamine was independent of the MPH-induced improvement in performance.
Healthy individuals with relatively higher levels of D2R/D3R benefited more from MPH (60 mg), while healthy individuals with relatively higher levels of D1R benefited only slightly.
Scientific: D1R binding following chronic high-dose MPH administration in rats
High-dose MPH (administered orally over 3 months) increased D1R binding in several regions of the basal ganglia in rats, particularly in the caudal portions of the caudate-putamen and in the tuberculum olfactorium. D2R binding remained unchanged at both doses tested. After one month of abstinence, no differences remained. (Animal study, rats, n = 8 to 9 per group, 3 months, E 2b.)45
A combination of MPH and fluoxetine did not alter D1R binding in rats.
(E 1b): The cortical D1R-to-D2R ratio modulates the effects of MPH. A combined PET-fMRI study (60 mg orally versus placebo) found a higher D1R/D2R ratio in the association cortices than in the sensorimotor areas in healthy subjects. MPH increased activity in association cortices and decreased it in sensorimotor areas. The D1/D2 ratio correlated positively with spatial working memory and negatively with age. (PET (D1, D2) and fMRI, n = 36, healthy subjects, 60 mg oral vs. placebo, E 2a.)100
MPH reduced the blink rate (a marker of striatal dopamine activity). The MPH-induced change in blink rate correlated negatively with baseline D1R availability in the caudate and putamen. (PET [11C]NNC112 and [11C]Raclopride, healthy subjects, 60 mg orally, E 2b.)101
MPH compressed the main cortical gradient (connectivity hierarchy). The extent of compression predicted striatal D1 and D2 availability. Compression in the inferior parietal cortex correlated with improved attention. (2 RCTs, n = 38 and n = 20, plus ABCD validation, n = 4,958; 60 mg orally; PET and fMRI; E 1b.)102 For connectivity, see 2.10.1.
(Animal study, rats, n = 8 to 9 per group, 4 weeks, E 2b)49
2.1.1.9. Dose-Dependent Effects of MPH
Implications for People with ADHD
The effects of MPH depend on the dose. MPH at a normal dose has different effects than MPH at a high or very high dose.
In animal studies, low-dose MPH increased dopamine and norepinephrine levels, particularly in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), and improved its function. In other brain regions, it had barely any effect on these neurotransmitters. This is consistent with the well-known improvement in PFC function resulting from mild increases in dopamine and norepinephrine. In laboratory experiments with mice, low concentrations of MPH increased dopamine release in the striatum, while higher concentrations decreased it. At higher doses, MPH is also thought to cause an outflow of dopamine and norepinephrine. Abusive intravenous self-administration increased the number of dopamine transporters in rats, while standard oral doses did not alter dopamine kinetics.
Animal studies found a narrow inverted U-curve for working memory and a broader effective dose range for sustained attention. The same dose improved working memory in some of the animals and impaired it in others.
In humans, too, the effect depended on individual baseline levels, such as the rate of dopamine synthesis in the striatum or the levels of GABA and glutamate in certain brain regions. Two studies by the same research group found conflicting associations with the rate of dopamine synthesis. The results are therefore inconclusive.
In children with ADHD, MPH improved behavior in a dose-dependent manner. Academic performance improved in one study regardless of the dose, and in another as the dose increased. The dose effect was individual and task-specific.
The effects of MPH are dose-dependent. MPH at normal doses produces different effects than MPH at high or very high doses.
-
At low doses, methylphenidate increased dopamine and norepinephrine levels in the PFC, which improved its performance. In other brain regions, however, low-dose MPH had barely any effect on dopamine and norepinephrine levels. (Animal study, rats, E 2b)103 This is consistent with the well-known enhancement of the PFC’s cognitive performance resulting from slight increases in dopamine and norepinephrine levels under mild stress.
-
At a dose of 3 mg/kg MPH, a study in mice found an increase in dopamine and norepinephrine in the PFC, but not in the striatum (acute and after 21 days) (animal study, mice, 21 days, E 2b.)10
-
In a laboratory study using mice, higher concentrations of MPH (as well as cocaine) were reported to reduce dopamine release in the striatum. Only lower concentrations of MPH or cocaine caused increases in dopamine signaling. In wild-type mice, MPH increased evoked dopamine release at 3 µM (by 127%) and decreased it at 10 µM (by 22%) and 30 µM (by 45%); cocaine increased it at 0.3 to 3 µM and decreased it at concentrations of 10 µM and above. In cocaine-insensitive mice (DAT-CI), cocaine and MPH reduced dopamine release even at low concentrations without prior reinforcement. (Animal study, mice, in vitro and microdialysis, E 2b.)15
-
At higher doses, MPH is also thought to stimulate the release of dopamine and norepinephrine via DAT and NET efflux (database, E 4)104
-
Intravenous self-administration of MPH at high (abusive) doses increased DAT levels in rats. Oral administration of 2 × 5 mg/kg/day for 14 days did not alter dopamine kinetics. (Animal study, rats, n = 11, 5 days of self-administration, E 2b.)105
Scientific: Baseline- and dose-dependent effects in PET, MRS, animal, and dose-finding studies
The effect of MPH on cognitive performance depends on the individual baseline level of striatal dopamine synthesis, although two [18F]FDOPA-PET studies by the same research group found opposing relationships:
- MPH (and sulpiride) most strongly increased the willingness to engage in cognitive effort when striatal dopamine synthesis rates were low. MPH enhanced the balance of benefits versus costs of cognitive effort. (Placebo-controlled, [18F]DOPA-PET, healthy subjects, E 2b.)106
- MPH increased the preference for cognitive tasks over leisure activities most significantly at high dopamine synthesis rates; sulpiride had no significant effect. (placebo-controlled, crossover, [18F]DOPA-PET, n = 50, healthy subjects, E 2b.)107
MPH improved accuracy and speed in reversal learning. Reward signals were stronger than punishment signals at high dopamine synthesis rates, while surprise signals were stronger at low rates. (Placebo-controlled, fMRI and [18F]DOPA-PET, n = 100, healthy subjects, E 2b.)108
In the animal model, the narrow, dose-dependent therapeutic window was confirmed: - MPH (1.5 mg/kg) improved working memory in half of the animals and impaired it in the other half. Both effects were reversed by the D1 antagonist SCH39266 administered intra-PFC; a D1 agonist was more effective. (Animal study, SHR, behavior and PFC single-cell recording, E 2b.)109
- MPH improved working memory in a narrow inverted U-shaped curve, while sustained attention improved across a broader dose range. PFC alpha-2 and D1 receptors were involved in both tasks, while alpha-1 receptors were involved only in sustained attention (facilitating). (animal study, rats, PFC infusions, E 2b.)110 For more on norepinephrine receptors, see 2.1.2.5.
The baseline levels of GABA and glutamate (Glx) modulated the dose-dependent effect on reaction control: - Striatal GABA+/Glx levels predicted better response inhibition at a low dose of MPH, while (prae-)SMA GABA+/Glx levels predicted a deterioration at a high dose. (Human MRS, healthy adults, E 2b.)111
- A moderate dose of MPH reduced subliminal interference the most. Higher striatal GABA+ levels were associated with better control at low doses, while low ACC GABA+ levels were associated with better control at moderate doses. (Human MRS and EEG, RCT, n = 71, healthy adults, MPH 0.25 vs. 0.50 mg/kg, E 1b.)112 See sections 2.1.7 and 2.11 for more information.
In children with ADHD, MPH improved behavior in a dose-dependent manner, but academic performance improved regardless of dose or task complexity. In the afternoon, a behavioral effect—but no effect on performance—occurred only at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg. (RCT, double-blind, crossover, n = 12, 0.3 vs. 1.0 mg/kg, full text not available to us, E 1b.)113 In 10 responders, a significant linear dose effect (5, 10, 15 mg) was observed on teacher ratings, on-task behavior, accuracy, and work volume, both individually and task-specifically. (Triple-blind, crossover, n = 12, boys, E 1b.)114 Both findings are also included in 4.2.
Scientific: Dose-Dependent Effects on Glutamate Receptors and Impulsive Choice in Rats
-
In adolescent rats, a low single dose of MPH (0.5 mg/kg) NMDA receptor-mediated excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in the PFC via adrenergic receptors and improved temporal order memory and attention. A high dose (10 mg/kg) suppressed NMDA- and AMPA-receptor-mediated EPSCs and increased locomotion. Both effects were accompanied by opposing changes in glutamate receptors on the cell surface. (Animal study, rats, E 2b.)115
-
In rats, the effect of higher doses of MPH on the choice of larger, delayed rewards depended on the baseline level of impulsivity. Up to 10 mg/kg, higher doses increased this choice in impulsive Lewis rats and decreased it in Wistar rats. (Animal study, n = 24, Lewis and Wistar rats, E 2b.)116
2.1.1.10. Duration-Dependent Effects of MPH
Implications for People with ADHD
A single dose and a prolonged course of MPH have, in some cases, different effects. Animal studies found persistent changes following several weeks of administration, such as an increased firing rate of neurons in the prefrontal cortex that persisted for 4 weeks after the end of treatment. In young rats, a two-week course of treatment increased the number of dopamine and norepinephrine transporters, as well as VMAT2, in some brain regions. This could suggest that MPH loses some of its acute effects over the long term. In humans, the number of dopamine transporters was also increased after 12 months of MPH treatment. Based on ADxS’s experience, the dose must be slightly increased once for some patients after half a year to one year. However, a general tolerance effect has not been reported either in studies or in clinical practice.
In children with ADHD, MPH reduced dopamine transporters in the striatum over a 3-month period. After discontinuation, they returned to baseline levels. Very high doses administered over 7 months reduced the number of dopamine neurons in rats. In monkeys, no adverse effects on monoamine function were observed after 8 years of MPH administration.
In children with ADHD, levels of the hormone oxytocin rose after interacting with a parent while taking MPH, just as they did in children without ADHD. In untreated children with ADHD, however, levels decreased.
Acute tolerance can develop within a single day. With blood levels remaining constant, the effect waned over the course of the day. There is no consensus on whether effects persist beyond the end of treatment.
2.1.1.10.1. Neurobiological changes following acute and chronic administration
Scientific: Animal studies on acute and chronic effects of MPH on neurons, monoamines, transporters, and metabolites
Acute administration of MPH increased the firing activity of PFC pyramidal neurons in rats and potentiated NMDA-induced neurotransmission.
Chronic MPH administration (2 × 2 mg/kg/day) resulted in the following changes in pyramidal neurons of the PFC 28 days after the end of MPH administration: (animal study, rats, 15 days, E 2b)9
- a long-term increase in combustion activity
- Unchanged burst activity
- unchanged total number of spontaneously firing neurons
- unchanged glutamatergic neurotransmission
Subchronic administration (14 days, 1 mg/kg) of MPH to prepubertal Naples High-Excitability (NHE) rats resulted in the following in adulthood: (animal study, NHE rats, 14 days, E 2b.)117
-
Reduced dopamine levels in the PFC and striatum
-
Increased norepinephrine in the ventral striatum
-
Atomoxetine, on the other hand, increased dopamine levels in the PFC and decreased them in the dorsal striatum
-
(E 2b): In adolescent rats, (animal study, adolescent rats, 15 days, E 2b)82 * (animal study, young rats, 2 weeks, E 2b)*83
- a single dose of high-dose MPH (2 mg/kg, which is roughly twice the maximum therapeutic dose typically used in humans)
- a reduction in the number of vesicular monoamine transporters (VMAT2) in the cerebellum
- No increase in dopamine turnover in the cerebellum (as measured by the DA metabolite DOPAC)
- No change in the protein levels of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and the dopamine D1 receptor
- Unchanged levels of dopamine and homovanillic acid (HVA)
- continuous administration of high-dose MPH (2 mg/kg twice daily) for 14 to 15 days
- increased number of vesicular monoamine transporters (VMAT2) in the cerebellum
- significantly increased dopamine turnover in the cerebellum (as measured by the metabolite DOPAC) (animal study, adolescent rats, 15 days, E 2b)82
- left the protein levels of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and the dopamine D1 receptor unchanged (animal study, adolescent rats, 15 days, E 2b)82 (elsewhere, the same authors: (animal study, young rats, 2 weeks, E 2b)83 )
- increased the number of DAT (animal study, young rats, 2 weeks, E 2b)83
- in the left dorsal striatum
- did not modify the DAT
- in the right dorsal striatum
- in the nucleus accumbens (ventral striatum) (animal study, young rats, 2 weeks, E 2b.)83
- increased the expression of the
- Norepinephrine transporter (NET)
- (E 2b): Monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) (animal study, adolescent rats, 15 days, E 2b)82 * (animal study, young rats, 2 weeks, E 2b)*83
- In contrast, amphetamine reduces VMAT2 function (Narrative review, E 4.)118
- Tyrosine hydroxylase
- Dopamine D1 receptors
- more pronounced in the nucleus accumbens (ventral striatum) than in the dorsal striatum
- more pronounced in the parietal cortex than in the frontal cortex
- (E 2b): This effect of chronic MPH on increasing DAT, NET, and VMAT2 transporters could suggest that, in the long term, the drug might lose some of its acute effect of raising dopamine and norepinephrine levels. (Animal study, young rats, 2 weeks, E 2b)83 * (Controlled cohort study, N = 29, n = 18, 12 months, E 2b)*51
This is consistent with our experience that, for some users, the dosage needs to be adjusted (slightly increased) once after half a year to a year. However, a general habituation effect has not been reported in studies (RCT follow-up, N = 433, n = 256, 1.5 years, E 1b)119 or in clinical practice. - Elevated levels of vanillinmandelic acid in the urine of Wistar rats. This was prevented by the adjunctive administration of buspirone. (animal study, Wistar rats, E 2b)120
Vanillinmandelic acid is produced during the breakdown of epinephrine and norepinephrine by MAO-A and COMT, making vanillinmandelic acid an indicator of the activity of the autonomic nervous system (sympathetic nervous system).
- A single dose of very high-dose MPH (5 mg/kg, which is about 5 to 20 times the standard treatment dose for humans) results in
- similar changes in metabolites in the cerebellum as with 2 mg
- Metabolites in the cerebellum that are associated with energy consumption and excitatory neurotransmission—specifically, glutamate, glutamine, N-acetyl aspartate, and inosine—tended to be reduced
- Furthermore, the levels of certain metabolites associated with inhibitory neurotransmission—in this case, GABA, glycine, acetate, aspartate, and hypoxanthine—were reduced
- a single dose of high-dose MPH (2 mg/kg, which is roughly twice the maximum therapeutic dose typically used in humans)
- A study found that children with ADHD had basal oxytocin levels that were unchanged compared to people without ADHD. While oxytocin levels decreased in untreated children with ADHD following interaction with a parent, oxytocin levels in children with ADHD treated with MPH increased, just as they did in people with ADHD. (Double-blind, placebo-controlled study, N = 90, n = 50, E 1b)121
(E 2b): Chronic MPH reversibly altered DAT and receptors. Human SPECT studies found after 3 months of MPH:
- Normalization of striatal DAT reduction, which returned to baseline levels after discontinuation (9 to 20 months of treatment). (SPECT, n = 5, children with ADHD, E 2b.)122
- a reduction in postsynaptic D2 receptors by up to 20% and in DAT by up to 74.7% in the striatum, accompanied by clinical improvement. (SPECT, n = 6, boys with ADHD, E 2b.)123 This also applies to 2.1.1.4.
In an animal model, a 7-month course of high-dose treatment (10 mg/kg, twice daily) reduced the number of dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra, as well as serotonergic (dorsal raphe) and cholinergic neurons, and increased the number of noradrenergic neurons (locus coeruleus). The proportion of fast-firing dopamine neurons was lower at the high dose. (Animal study, rats, 7 months, 2 vs. 10 mg/kg, E 2b.)124 These high-dose, long-term findings also apply to #185.
In rhesus monkeys, 8 years of MPH administration did not result in any significant change in VMAT2 or D2/5HT2 binding in the striatum, nor did it have any adverse effects on monoamine function. (Animal study, microPET/CT with [18F]AV-133 and [18F]FESP, rhesus monkeys, 8 years, full text not available to us, E 2b.)125 This long-term safety finding also applies to #185.
2.1.1.10.2. Effects Throughout the Day and After Treatment Ends
Implications for People with ADHD
With blood levels remaining constant, the effect of MPH in children waned over the course of the day (acute tolerance). A blood level that rose throughout the day was as effective in the afternoon as twice-daily dosing. Another study found that pulsatile dosing was more effective than dosing with rising levels.
There is no consensus on whether effects persist beyond the end of treatment. In one study, after a one-week break, there were no lasting improvements in working memory and reaction time. After more than 2 years of treatment, children and adolescents made more working memory errors after discontinuing the medication than when they continued treatment. This decline in test performance was not associated with clinical deterioration. In children, but not in adults, an altered response of the dopamine system was still observed one week after the end of treatment.
- After taking MPH for more than 2 years, children and adolescents made more working memory errors after switching to a placebo than when they continued treatment (b = 1.62, p = 0.01, Cohen’s f² = 0.14). No differences were found in response inhibition, flexibility, or psychomotor speed. Test performance was not associated with clinical deterioration. (RCT, double-blind, placebo-controlled discontinuation study, n = 94, 7 weeks, E 1b.)126
- After 16 weeks of MPH treatment, working memory and reaction time improved in boys (ages 10 to 12) and men (ages 23 to 40) with ADHD only during the treatment period. After a one-week washout period, there were no lasting effects, even when adjusted for age. (RCT, placebo-controlled, N = 98, 16 weeks, E 1b.)127
(E 1b): Methylphenidate showed acute tolerance in children with ADHD. With a constant plasma level (flat dosing profile), the effect decreased over the course of the day and was significantly lower in the afternoon than with twice-daily dosing. A second dose administered shortly after the first was less effective, whereas two doses administered far apart were not. An ascending profile was as effective in the afternoon as twice-daily dosing; an initial bolus was not required for this. A concentration-effect model required a tolerance term (counterclockwise hysteresis). (2 double-blind laboratory school studies, n = 31 and n = 30, manufacturer-funded, author(s) employed by the manufacturer, E 1b.)128 A population model based on pediatric efficacy data from various sustained-release MPH formulations also described the effect using an Emax model with time-dependent tolerance. (Modeling meta-analysis, k = 9, author(s) employed by the manufacturer, E 2b.)129
A pulsatile dose of 1 mg/kg/day improved activity and attention (M-MAT) in boys with ADHD more than a dose administered with rising blood levels. The absorption and elimination of d-MPH depended on the administration pattern, particularly on the size of the initial bolus. The authors hypothesized that d-MPH slows the subsequent absorption of d-MPH in the gastrointestinal tract. (RCT, n = 48, E 1b.)130
A 16-week course of MPH increased the thalamic blood flow response to an MPH challenge 1 week after the end of treatment in boys (ages 10 to 12), but not in men (ages 23 to 40) or in the placebo group (mean difference 6.5, 95% CI 0.4 to 12.6). In the striatum, MPH differed from placebo in children (mean difference 7.7, 95% CI 0.7 to 14.8), but not in adults. The authors interpreted this as an age-dependent effect on the dopaminergic system that persisted beyond the treatment period. (RCT, n = 99, 16 weeks, E 1b.)131
2.1.2. MPH increases norepinephrine
Implications for People with ADHD
Methylphenidate (MPH) affects not only dopamine but also norepinephrine. Norepinephrine is a neurotransmitter that helps regulate alertness, sustained attention (vigilance), and attention. MPH acts on the locus coeruleus, the most important norepinephrine-rich region in the brainstem, thereby improving alertness and attention.
MPH inhibits the norepinephrine transporter (NET). This transporter reuptakes norepinephrine into the nerve cell after signal transmission. When it is blocked, more norepinephrine remains active outside the cells. An imaging study in humans found that even clinically standard doses significantly occupied the NET. In the prefrontal cortex (PFC), which is important for planning, decision-making, and impulse control, there are only a few dopamine transporters. In this region, the NET also takes up dopamine. Therefore, inhibition of the NET simultaneously increases dopamine levels in the PFC.
The effect depends on the dose. In animal studies, low doses of dopamine and norepinephrine increased levels primarily in the PFC and improved its function, but had barely any effect on other brain regions. In adolescent rats, low oral doses increased norepinephrine in the hippocampus without altering dopamine in the reward system (nucleus accumbens) and without causing habituation. In contrast, very high doses—far exceeding the therapeutic dose—increased dopamine and norepinephrine and triggered stereotyped behavior.
MPH also acts through norepinephrine receptors. In animal studies, certain effects—such as attention, learning processes in the hippocampus, or MPH-induced impulsivity—were linked to beta, alpha-1, and alpha-2 receptors. There is conflicting evidence regarding whether MPH activates or blocks the alpha-2 receptor. One textbook cites a blocking effect, while several other sources cite an activating effect. In monkeys, the improvement in cognitive performance induced by MPH was prevented by alpha-2 blockers. The ADHD medications guanfacine and clonidine also activate this receptor. Another animal study suggests that the role of the alpha-2 receptor is not simply one of activation.
There is no evidence that MPH increases norepinephrine levels via the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2), which packages neurotransmitters into storage vesicles. What has been described is an altered distribution of VMAT2 within the cell.
Most of the detailed findings in this section are based on animal studies.
- MPH may also exert a noradrenergic effect on the arousal system of the locus coeruleus, thereby improving vigilance and attention and modulating prefrontal regions via direct projections (Textbook, E 4.)3
- The effects of MPH are dose-dependent. MPH at normal doses produces different effects than MPH at high or very high doses.
- At low doses, methylphenidate increased dopamine and norepinephrine levels in the PFC, which improved its performance. In other brain regions, however, low-dose MPH had barely any effect on dopamine and norepinephrine levels. (Animal study, rats, E 2b)103 This is consistent with the well-known enhancement of the PFC’s cognitive performance resulting from slight increases in dopamine and norepinephrine levels under mild stress.
Scientific: Firing Rate of the Locus Coeruleus Under Acute and Chronic MPH in Rats
MPH modulated the activity of the locus coeruleus. An acute dose (2.5 mg/kg) altered the firing rate in 87% of the recorded LC units, with 80% of these showing an increase. Chronic administration led to sensitization (41%) or tolerance (59%). (animal study, rats, free-moving LC recording, E 2b.)132 This also applies to the firing rate (2.1.1.3).
2.1.2.1. Low-dose MPH
Scientific: Tonic and phasic locus coeruleus discharges under low-dose MPH in rats
Low-dose MPH reduced the tonic and phasic discharge of the locus coeruleus in a dose-dependent (moderate) manner. It decreased the signal-to-noise ratio of the excitatory phasic discharge and increased the inhibitory component. Oral and intraperitoneal administration had comparable effects. (Animal study, rats, LC recording, E 2b.)133
2.1.2.1.1. Elevated extracellular norepinephrine in the hippocampus, but not dopamine in the nucleus accumbens
Adolescent rats were administered 0.75–3.0 mg/kg of MPH orally during the dark-active phase of the circadian cycle, which remained below the threshold for locomotor activation. These doses: (animal study, adolescent rats, up to 4 weeks, E 2b)7
- elevated extracellular norepinephrine in the hippocampus
- no changes in dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens
- did not alter methamphetamine sensitivity
- did not cause any habituation effects
Scientific: Catecholamines and Serotonin at Very High Doses of MPH in Rats
Doses of 10, 20, and 30 mg/kg MPH (well above a therapeutic dose) resulted in: (animal study, rats, E 2b)134
- stereotypical behavior (a sign of a sharp increase in extracellular dopamine). 20 mg/kg is just as potent as 2.5 mg/kg of AMP
- Increased extracellular dopamine
- Increased extracellular norepinephrine
- Extracellular serotonin remains unchanged (unlike with AMP, where it is elevated)
2.1.2.2. MPH binds to NET (resumption inhibitor)
- Norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (Textbook, E 4)3 * (Animal study, n = 27, rats, E 2b)9 * (Placebo-controlled PET study with a within-subject design, single-blind, n = 11, healthy subjects, E 2b)135
- This also leads to an increase in extracellular dopamine in the PFC, where there are few DAT receptors but abundant NET receptors. The NET receptors in the PFC reabsorb approximately as much dopamine as norepinephrine.
Scientific: NET Function in the Orbitofrontal Cortex in a Rat Model of ADHD
NET function (norepinephrine uptake rate) in the orbitofrontal cortex was elevated in the SHR (ADHD model). MPH administered during adolescence normalized NET function in the OFC in adulthood. (Animal study, SHR, WKY, and Wistar; in vivo voltammetry, E 2b.)136 This also applies to the long-term effects (2.1.1.10). For information on the reduction of NET in the thalamus under MPH in humans, see Oya (2026) under 2.1.1.2.
2.1.2.3. MPH causes norepinephrine efflux in the PFC
At a concentration of 100 µM, MPH appears to induce both dopamine and norepinephrine efflux in the PFC, originating from both dopamine and norepinephrine terminals.
- Norepinephrine efflux from noradrenergic terminals (tissue samples loaded with 67 to 83 nM radioactively labeled norepinephrine) (animal study, n = 27, rats, E 2b.)9
- measured ex vivo
- at 100 µM MPH (10 µM MPH did not cause dopamine efflux; noradrenaline efflux was not reported at 10 µM)
Scientific: Norepinephrine in the somatosensory and medial prefrontal cortex in rats
MPH (1 and 5 mg/kg) increased norepinephrine levels in the primary somatosensory cortex by 64% and 101%, respectively, and suppressed post-excitatory inhibition as well as the long-latency excitation of sensory responses. (Animal study, rats, microdialysis and SI cortex recording, E 2b.)137
In vivo, MPH increased extracellular dopamine and norepinephrine levels in the medial PFC (microdialysis) in rats by: (animal study, rats, E 2b.)138
- 286% dopamine and 127% norepinephrine after 5 mg/kg i.p.
- 129% dopamine and 30% norepinephrine after 10 mg/kg administered intragastrically
A 15-minute handling stress altered only the dopamine response, not the norepinephrine response. Stress administered 2 hours before MPH (5 mg/kg i.p.) reduced the dopamine increase to 203%; stress administered 15 minutes after MPH (10 mg/kg intragastric) increased it to 273%. (Animal study, rats, E 2b.)138
2.1.2.4. MPH Increases NE via VMAT2
MPH influences the redistribution of the vesicular monoamine transporter-2 (VMAT-2; Solute Carrier Family 18 Member 2 - SLC18A2). VMAT2 is involved in the sequestration of cytoplasmic dopamine and norepinephrine and is therefore an important regulator of neurotransmission.
MPH does not affect the total amount of VMAT-2 in presynaptic terminals, but only its transport.
MPH causes the following in monoaminergic neurons (but not in cholinergic, GABAergic, or glutamatergic neurons): (Narrative review, E 4)47
- Decrease in VMAT-2 immunoreactivity in the membrane-associated fraction
- Increase in the cytoplasmic fraction
- no change in the total synaptosomal pool
2.1.2.5. MPH binds to norepinephrine receptors
Scientific: The Role of β-Adrenoceptors in the Effects of MPH in Animal Studies
(E 2b): In animal studies, the effects of MPH were dependent on noradrenergic β-receptors in:
- MPH-induced impulsivity (premature responses in the 5-choice serial reaction time task, 2 mg/kg MPH). The centrally acting propranolol completely reversed this effect, whereas the peripherally acting nadolol did not. The α1 antagonist prazosin partially attenuated them, as did the D4 antagonist L-745,870. Cortical norepinephrine depletion did not alter them. (Animal study, rats, E 2b.)139
- Enhanced long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) in the hippocampus (CA1, preadolescent rats, 10 to 50 ng/ml MPH) without presynaptic changes (animal study, brain sections, rats, E 2b.)140
- dose-dependent enhancement of LTP in the hippocampus (CA3-CA1, young rats, EC50 73.44 nM), further mediated by D1/D5 dopamine receptors and PKA, with increased phosphorylation of the AMPA receptor subunit GluA1 (Ser845) and more functional AMPA receptors on the cell surface (animal study, brain sections, rats, E 2b.)141
- Increased phosphorylation of GluA1 (Ser845) in Bergmann glial cells of the cerebellum following administration of MPH (15 mg/kg) and d-amphetamine (10 mg/kg). For d-amphetamine, this effect depended on intact norepinephrine release and β1-adrenoceptors, but not on D1 receptors. (Animal study, mice, E 2b.)142
2.1.2.6. Alpha-1 receptor
MPH also improves attention via the alpha-1 receptor. (animal study, rats, E 2b)143
2.1.2.7. Alpha-2 receptor
MPH binds directly to noradrenergic alpha-2 receptors. (Systematic review, industry-funded, E 2b)144 MPH binds to: (Narrative review, E 4)47
- α2A (Ki = 5.6 µM)
- α2B (Ki = 2.420 µM)
- α2C (Ki = 0.860 µM)
The cognitive improvement produced by MPH in this way could be blocked by α2-adrenoceptor antagonists. (animal study, rhesus monkeys, E 2b)145 Guanfacine and clonidine, which also act as α2-adrenoceptor agonists, have a positive effect on ADHD.
- Blockade of the alpha-2-adrenoceptor (Textbook, E 4)3
Scientific: The Role of α2-Adrenoceptors in the Effects of MPH in Animal Studies
(E 2b): Animal studies have shown that α2-adrenoceptors are involved in the effects of MPH in:
- Increased excitability of pyramidal cells in the deep layers of the infralimbic and prelimbic PFC (juvenile rats, 10 µM MPH). This effect was abolished following catecholamine depletion by reserpine and was mediated via α2 receptors. D1 receptors did not play a discernible role. (animal study, brain sections, rats, E 2b.)146
- enhanced noradrenergic inhibition in the locus coeruleus of juvenile rats. MPH hyperpolarized the neurons and reduced their spontaneous firing rate (at concentrations above 3 µM), enhanced the norepinephrine-mediated inhibitory postsynaptic current (IPSC), and triggered a barium-sensitive, inward-rectifying potassium current. The α2 antagonist yohimbine blocked the potentiation of the IPSC. (Animal study, brain sections, rats, E 2b.)147
- the psychomotor-stimulating effect of MPH (1 mg/kg s.c.), which was attenuated by the α2 antagonist RX821002 in the infralimbic cortex. RX821002 did not prevent the suppression of social play by MPH, neither in the anterior cingulate cortex nor in the infralimbic cortex, in the basolateral amygdala, or in the habenula, which the authors interpreted as parallel mediation via prefrontal and limbic regions. (Animal study, rats, E 2b.)148
- Activity and discrimination accuracy in an operant test. MPH (0.3 to 3 mg/kg s.c.) dose-dependently reduced the number of responses and rewards received in control mice and increased them in α2C-adrenoceptor knockout mice. (Animal study, mice, E 2b.)149
- the activation of PFC neurons by MPH (1 or 3 mg/kg i.v.). The α2 antagonist yohimbine potentiated this effect and rendered an otherwise ineffective dose (0.3 mg/kg) effective. The D1 antagonist SCH 23390 partially reduced or prevented this response. Locally administered MPH produced a D1-dependent effect; dopamine (but not norepinephrine) enhanced the response. (Animal study, rats, E 2b.)150
2.1.3. MPH and Serotonin
Implications for People with ADHD
Serotonin is a neurotransmitter involved in, among other things, mood, impulse control, and the sleep-wake cycle. Overall, MPH appears to have little effect on serotonin. According to a review article, MPH binds to the dopamine transporter approximately 2,200 times more strongly and to the norepinephrine transporter nearly 1,300 times more strongly than to the serotonin transporter (SERT). In animal studies, MPH had no effect or only an isolated effect on serotonin levels outside nerve cells in several brain regions, while it increased dopamine and norepinephrine levels. Lisdexamfetamine, on the other hand, additionally increased serotonin levels.
Whether MPH actually inhibits serotonin reuptake is a matter of debate. In any case, such an effect is too weak to be clinically significant. According to ADxS, MPH does not have a significant mood-enhancing effect. An antidepressant effect may arise indirectly if MPH corrects a stimulus-filtering deficit that leads to depression.
In children with ADHD, MPH did not significantly alter the reduced morning blood serotonin levels, but it did alter the daily rhythm of melatonin. In children with predominantly hyperactive ADHD and depressive symptoms, MPH restored the diurnal pattern of certain breakdown products of the amino acid tryptophan—from which serotonin is produced—to the levels seen in healthy children.
In cell experiments, one form of MPH (d-threo-MPH) weakly activated the 5-HT1A serotonin receptor, though the extent of activation was minimal. In rats, repeated administration of MPH reduced the activity of this receptor in the reward system (nucleus accumbens). This could be significant for the rewarding effects of MPH. Low doses improved memory in rats, while higher doses impaired it. It is unclear whether MPH acts on the 5-HT2B receptor.
Genetic variants of the enzyme tryptophan hydroxylase 2, which produces serotonin in the brain, appear to influence how well MPH works.
The predominantly serotonergic neurons of the dorsal raphe nuclei in rats responded more strongly and differently to MPH than dopamine and norepinephrine neurons. With repeated administration, some animals developed an enhanced response (sensitization), while others developed a reduced (tolerance). Young and adult animals differed in this regard. Serotonin therefore appears to play a distinct role in the response to MPH, despite its limited direct effect. Most of these findings come from animal studies.
Overall, the effect of MPH on serotonin levels appears to be negligible. (Narrative review, E 4)151
MPH is reported to bind to DAT 2,200 times more strongly than to SERT, and to NET nearly 1,300 times more strongly than to SERT. (Narrative Review, E 4)47
Scientific: Serotonin Levels Under the Influence of MPH and Lisdexamfetamine in Rats (Microdialysis)
Methylphenidate (3, 10, and 30 mg/kg orally) did not alter extracellular serotonin levels in the PFC of rats and did so only sporadically in the striatum (a single increase to 319% 45 minutes after a 30 mg/kg dose, followed by a decrease 3 to 4 hours after all doses), while it increased norepinephrine and dopamine in the PFC as well as dopamine in the striatum. In the same experiment, lisdexamfetamine additionally increased serotonin in the PFC and striatum, though to a lesser extent and for a shorter duration than norepinephrine and dopamine. (Animal study, rats, manufacturer-funded, author(s) employed by the manufacturer, E 2b.)152
The point of contention is:
- whether serotonin reuptake is inhibited at the synapse. There are sources that dispute this. (Narrative review, E 4)153 The study cited by von Trott and Wirth (2000) as evidence did not address MPH, but rather D-amphetamine. In synaptosomes from rat brain, this substance primarily inhibited norepinephrine reuptake (half-maximal inhibitory concentration 80 nM; dopamine 500 nM; serotonin 12 µM). Only after high doses (15 mg/kg i.p.) did it reach brain levels in rats that were also capable of inhibiting serotonin reuptake. (Narrative review, E 4.)154
- The serotonergic effect of MPH is so weak that it is not relevant to treatment
- In our experience, MPH does not have a significant mood-enhancing effect. MPH may act as an antidepressant by correcting the stimulus-filtering deficit that has consequences for depression.
Scientific: Extracellular serotonin, SERT density, and blood serotonin levels under MPH
(E 2b): MPH did not alter extracellular serotonin levels in animal studies:
- in the PFC and the ventral hippocampus (2.5 mg/kg s.c.; citalopram, by contrast, significantly increased these levels). When combined with citalopram, MPH enhanced the citalopram-induced increase in serotonin in the hippocampus and attenuated it in the cortex. The combination increased dopamine in the PFC, nucleus accumbens, and hippocampus to a greater extent than MPH alone, but not in the striatum. (Animal study, microdialysis, rats, E 2b.)155
- in the nucleus accumbens (10 mg/kg i.p.) with elevated dopamine levels, unlike methamphetamine (animal study, microdialysis, rats, E 2b.)156
(E 2b): Chronic MPH altered the density of the serotonin transporter (SERT) in animal studies:
- increased in the medial frontal cortex of adult rats (20 mg/kg orally twice daily for 11 days), 2 and 12 weeks after discontinuation (animal study, n = 30, rats, 11 days, E 2b.)157
- not in the striatum in adulthood (day 90 of life) following administration of 2 mg/kg/day on days 25 through 39 or 50 through 64 of life, neither in SHR (ADHD animal model) nor in WKY. Older SHR rats had a higher striatal SERT density than WKY rats. (animal study, SHR, WKY, rats, 2 weeks, E 2b.)158
In children with ADHD, sustained-release MPH did not significantly alter the morning blood serotonin levels, which are typically reduced in ADHD. A circadian rhythm characterized by higher morning melatonin levels disappeared with MPH, and nocturnal excretion of 6-sulfatoxymelatonin decreased. (Controlled, quasi-experimental, open-label study, N = 179, n = 136, 4.6 months, E 2b.)159
2.1.3.1. 5HT-1A serotonin receptor
D-threo-(R,R)-methylphenidate acted as a weak agonist of the 5HT-1A serotonin receptor. This may influence dopamine metabolism in the brain, (in vitro study, CHO cells, guinea pig ileum, rat gastric fundus, E 2b)160 although the extent of this effect is minimal.
Scientific: 5-HT1A receptor expression, GABA and glutamate receptors under the influence of MPH in rats
Repeated administration of MPH reduced 5-HT-1A-R expression
- in the nucleus accumbens
- significant at 2.5 mg/kg (animal study, N = 16, rats, 12 days, E 2b.)161
- which is relevant to the reinforcing effects of MPH (animal study, N = 16, rats, 12 days, E 2b)161
- Buspirone
- Doses of 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg prevented downregulation, but doses of 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg of buspirone did not (animal study, rats, E 2b)162
- 10 mg/kg/day prevented the development of tolerance following long-term administration of 2 mg/kg/day MPH (animal study, rats, E 2b)163
- Buspirone is a partial 5-HT1A agonist and a D2R antagonist
- in the PFC
Low doses (2.5 mg/kg) of MPH improved memory performance in the water maze test, while higher doses (5 mg/kg) impaired it. Improved performance correlated with high 5-HT metabolism in the PFC. (animal study, rats, E 2b)164
- GABAA receptor mRNA expression is reduced at low doses of MPH (2.5 mg/kg)
- GluN2A expression is reduced at high doses of MPH (5 mg/kg)
- According to the authors, elevated 5-HT levels and reduced GABAA receptor mRNA expression in the PFC appeared to free excitatory glutamate neurons from the inhibitory influence of GABA
- Reduced 5-HT1A receptor mRNA expression enhances the inhibitory effect of GABA on glutamate neurons and thereby impairs cognitive performance.
Repeated administration of MPH (1 mg/kg, 14 days) and tryptophan (100 mg/kg) each increased locomotor activity in rats. Pretreatment or concurrent treatment with tryptophan significantly reduced MPH-induced behavioral sensitization. The authors attributed this to desensitization of somatodendritic 5-HT1A receptors due to increased serotonin levels. (Animal study, rats, 2 × 14 days, full text not available to us, E 2b.)165
2.1.3.2. 5HT-1B serotonin receptor
It is unclear whether MPH also binds to or exerts an effect on the 5-HT2B serotonin receptor. One study found binding affinity for d- and l-MPH at the 5-HT2B receptor (in vitro study, receptor binding assay, E 2b.)166 ; another study found no functional activity of d-threo-MPH at the 5-HT2B receptor. (in vitro study, CHO cells, guinea pig ileum, rat gastric fundus, E 2b.)160
Scientific: 5-HT1B Receptors and MPH-Induced Locomotion in Rats
A 5-HT1B receptor agonist (CP 94253, 1 to 10 mg/kg) significantly and dose-dependently potentiated MPH-induced locomotor activation in rats. Pretreatment with methamphetamine or fluoxetine, which increased extracellular serotonin, also potentiated this effect. This effect was blocked by a 5-HT1B antagonist (GR 55562), but not by a 5-HT2 antagonist (ritanserin). MPH itself (10 mg/kg i.p.) increased dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, but not serotonin. (Animal study, rats, E 2b.)156
2.1.3.3. MPH and Tryptophan Hydroxylase
Of the two tryptophan hydroxylase isoforms, TPH1 and TPH2, only TPH2 is found in the brain. TPH catalyzes the rate-limiting step in serotonin synthesis by converting tryptophan into the serotonin precursor 5-hydroxytryptophan. (Narrative Review, E 4)93
The AATGGAGA (Yin) haplotype of TPH2 appears to respond less well to MPH than the CGCAAGAC (Yang) haplotype. (Narrative Review, E 4)93
2.1.3.4. Effect of MPH on Tryptophan Metabolites
In a study of people with ADHD-HI (predominantly hyperactive) and comorbid depressive symptoms, morning levels of indoleacetic acid were found to be significantly higher than evening levels compared to people with ADHD-I and healthy controls. MPH reduced this by 50%. At the same time, MPH reduced morning levels of indolepropionic acid and brought the daily profile back in line with the levels observed in healthy control subjects. (observational study with a control group, N = 179, n = 107, 4.6 months, E 2b)167
Scientific: 5-HIAA in the striatum, frontal cortex, and hippocampus following high doses of MPH in rats
Doses of MPH (30 mg/kg) that induce stereotypy and amphetamine (3 mg/kg) increased levels of the serotonin metabolite 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in the striatum and frontal cortex of rats, which receive serotonergic fibers from the dorsal raphe. In the hippocampus, which is innervated by the median raphe, these doses either decreased 5-HIAA or had no effect on it. The authors interpreted this as evidence of enhanced serotonergic function of the dorsal raphe. Pretreatment with α-methyltyrosine did not prevent the amphetamine-induced increase in 5-HIAA. (Animal study, rats, E 2b.)168
2.1.3.5. Effect of MPH on the dorsal raphe nuclei
Administration of MPH over several days caused
- behavioral sensitization in some rats (which correlated with neuronal excitation) and
- behavioral tolerance in other rats (which was accompanied by neural attenuation).
The neurons of the dorsal raphe nuclei (serotonergic) showed the strongest response to acute and chronic MPH administration and reacted differently to all three doses used compared to the neurons in the VTA (dopaminergic) or locus coeruleus (noradrenergic). (Animal study, 1,170 neurons, rats, 10 days, E 2b)169
In the behavioral sensitization group, the firing rate of the (presumably predominantly serotonergic) neurons in the dorsal raphe nuclei increased following repeated MPH administration; in the behavioral tolerance group, it remained the same or decreased. (Animal study, n = 161, adolescent rats, 10 days, E 2b.)170
The dorsal raphe nuclei and serotonin appear to be involved in the acute and chronic effects of MPH and to play an independent role in the response to MPH.
Scientific: Neurons in the dorsal raphe of young and adult rats under MPH
The response of dorsal raphe neurons to acute and chronic MPH (0.6, 2.5, and 10 mg/kg on 6 days, a 3-day washout period, and re-administration on day 10) differed significantly between young and adult rats (504 and 356 recorded neurons, respectively). Neurons from behaviorally sensitized animals responded differently to the repeat administration than neurons from behaviorally tolerant animals. The proportion of animals exhibiting sensitization or tolerance at the same dose differed between young and adult animals. (Animal study, 860 neurons, rats, 10 days, E 2b.)171
2.1.4. Binding Affinity of MPH, AMP, and ATX to DAT, NET, and SERT
Implications for People with ADHD
The active ingredients in ADHD medications bind with varying degrees of affinity to the three transporters that reuptake dopamine (DAT), norepinephrine (NET), and serotonin (SERT) into the nerve cell after signal transmission. This binding inhibits the respective transporter, allowing more of the neurotransmitter to remain active outside the cell. In the table, a smaller number indicates a stronger binding affinity.
Methylphenidate (MPH) binds strongly to the DAT, somewhat weaker to the NET, and barely to the SERT. d- and l-amphetamine bind strongly to the DAT and NET, but only weakly to the SERT. Atomoxetine binds very strongly to the NET, significantly weaker to the SERT, and only weakly to the DAT.
Further laboratory studies found values for MPH in a similar range. The human dopamine transporter was more sensitive to MPH than that of mice. In a human imaging study, intravenously administered MPH blocked the DAT in the striatum to a degree similar to that of cocaine. Heart rate and blood pressure increased similarly under the influence of both substances, but the increase was more prolonged with MPH. The exact numerical values vary depending on the measurement method, tissue, and animal species.
The active ingredients methylphenidate (MPH), d-amphetamine (d-AMP), l-amphetamine (l-AMP), and atomoxetine (ATX) bind with varying affinities to dopamine transporters (DAT), norepinephrine transporters (NET), and serotonin transporters (SERT). This binding inhibits the activity of the respective transporters. (Narrative Review, E 4)172
| Binding affinity: higher at lower concentrations (Ki or IC50 in nmol/L) | DAT | NET | SERT |
|---|---|---|---|
| MPH | 34 - 200 | 339 | over 10,000 |
| d-AMP (Vyvanse, Attentin) | 34–41 | 23.2–38.9 | 3,830–11,000 |
| l-AMP | 138 | 30.1 | 57,000 |
| ATX | 1451–1600 | 2.6–5 | 48–77 |
Scientific: Inhibition constants of MPH at DAT, NET, SERT, and hOCT1 from individual studies
(E 2b): Other studies found inhibition constants (Ki) and half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) for MPH
- on the date of:
- Ki 60 nM (human DAT, murine DAT 260 nM, amphetamine at human DAT 640 nM) (in vitro study, human and murine transporters, E 2b.)173
- Ki 210 nM (caudate-putamen brain slices, mice, voltammetry, cocaine 350 nM, amphetamine 420 nM) (in vitro study, mice, E 2b.)174
- Ki 341.2 nM for synaptosomal uptake (striatum, rats; vesicular uptake 39,300 nM; d-amphetamine 206 and 565.2 nM, respectively) (In vitro study, rats, manufacturer-funded, E 2b.)175
- on the NET from:
- Ki 100 nM (human NET, murine NET 170 nM, amphetamine at human NET 70 nM) (in vitro study, human and murine transporters, E 2b.)173
- Ki 238 nM for synaptosomal uptake (frontal cortex, rats; vesicular uptake 11,400 nM; d-amphetamine 54.8 and 261 nM, respectively; atomoxetine synaptosomal 20.6 nM) (In vitro study, rats, manufacturer-funded, E 2b.)175
- at the SERT by:
- Ki 19 µM (brain slices of the substantia nigra, mice, cocaine 10 µM, amphetamine 23 µM) (in vitro study, mice, E 2b.)174
- IC50 118 µM (synaptosomes, rats; cocaine 70 µM, d-amphetamine 570 µM) (in vitro study, rats; full text not available to us, E 2b.)176
- Ki 132 µM (human SERT, approximately 2,200 times weaker than at human DAT; amphetamine 38 µM) (in vitro study, human and murine transporters, E 2b.)173
- at the organic cation transporter hOCT1 (low-affinity, high-capacity monoamine transporter) with an IC50 of 0.36 µM (95% CI 0.27 to 0.46). MPH did not completely inhibit hOCT2, hOCT3, and PMAT. (In vitro study, HEK293 cells, E 2b.)177
Intravenous MPH blocked DAT in the striatum in vivo in a dose-dependent manner with an ED50 (dose that blocks 50% of DAT) of 0.07 mg/kg; cocaine had an ED50 of 0.13 mg/kg. This was consistent with the reported in vitro affinities (Ki for MPH 390 nM, cocaine 640 nM). Heart rate and blood pressure increased similarly with both substances, but the increase was significantly more prolonged with MPH. (Comparison of two PET studies, N = 25, n = 8 healthy subjects with MPH, n = 17 cocaine users with cocaine, E 2b.)178
2.1.5. Effects of MPH, AMP, and ATX on Dopamine and Norepinephrine by Brain Region
The active ingredients methylphenidate (MPH), amphetamine (AMP), and atomoxetine (ATX) affect extracellular dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) to varying degrees in different regions of the brain. Table based on Madras (microdialysis in rats), (narrative review, E 4.)172 , modified.
| PFC | ; striatum | ; nucleus accumbens | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MPH | DA + NE (+) | DA + NE +/- 0 | DA + NE +/- 0 |
| AMP | DA + NE + | DA + NE +/- 0 | DA + NE +/- 0 |
| ATX | DA + NE + | DA +/- 0 NE +/- 0 | DA +/- 0 NE +/- 0 |
2.1.6. Effect of MPH on MAO-A
MPH enhances the effects of dopamine and norepinephrine, as described in a chapter of the book: (Book chapter, E 4.)179
- Inhibition of dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake
- Promotion of dopamine release from reserpine-sensitive (vesicular) stores
- Inhibition of MAO activity (subtype not specified; secondary citation from Solanto (1998)) (book chapter, E 4.)179 * (narrative review, E 4.)70 * (thesis, E 4.)180
However, the impact appears to be limited and of little significance.
2.1.7. Effect of MPH on Glutamate
Implications for People with ADHD
Glutamate is the most important excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain. A systematic review of 10 studies found that, in children with ADHD, three studies reported a decrease in glutamate levels following MPH administration in a network comprising the frontal lobe and cerebellum, as well as in the amygdala, a brain region important for emotions. In adults, most studies found no significant change.
Individual studies in children and adolescents measured metabolic products in the brain using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Two studies found a lower glutamate-to-creatine ratio in the prefrontal cortex after 8 and 12 weeks of MPH treatment, respectively. In contrast, one study found an increase in glutamate plus glutamine in the white matter behind the prefrontal cortex in children who responded well to MPH. Another study found higher levels in untreated ADHD than after treatment, but the difference was not significant. These studies were small and, for the most part, lacked a control group. The findings are inconsistent.
In animal studies, MPH altered signal transmission via glutamate receptors (NMDA and AMPA receptors), which are important for learning and memory. The effect was highly dose-dependent. In adolescent rats, a low dose enhanced NMDA signaling in the prefrontal cortex and improved memory and attention. A high dose suppressed this signaling and increased motor activity. In rats with initially weak response inhibition (the ability to stop an action once it has begun), MPH improved this function via AMPA receptors. In young rats, long-term treatment increased glutamate levels in the cerebrospinal fluid, which the authors interpreted as possible damage to nerve cells due to overexcitation. In an ADHD rat model, several days of MPH administration increased baseline glutamate levels in the frontal cortex. These findings are based on animal studies.
Three studies found a statistically significant decrease in glutamate levels in the fronto-cerebellar circuit and the amygdala in children following MPH administration. In adults, most studies found no significant change in glutamate levels or glutamate-related metabolites following MPH exposure. (Systematic review, k = 10, E 2b.)181
Scientific: Individual MR spectroscopy studies and glutamatergic mechanisms in animal studies
(E 2b): Changes in proton MR spectroscopy following MPH treatment in children and adolescents with ADHD:
- Glutamate/creatine in the right DLPFC (decrease after 8 weeks), plus a decrease in choline/creatine in the left crus 1 of the cerebellum (Open-label pre-post study, n = 15, 8 weeks, full text not available to us, E 2b.)182
- Glutamate/creatine in the PFC (decrease of 15% on the right and 14.1% on the left after 12 weeks of 20 mg sustained-release MPH). N-acetylaspartate/creatine increased by 18.8% on the right and 10% on the left; choline/creatine decreased by 12.4% on the right and 16% on the left; myo-inositol/creatine decreased by 14.7% on the left. (Open-label pre-post study, n = 21, 12 weeks, E 2b.)183
- Glutamate plus glutamine (absolute and relative to creatine) in the left white matter behind the DLPFC (increase after 2 months of OROS-MPH in responders). In contrast, following atomoxetine treatment, N-acetylaspartate/creatine levels decreased on the left side of the DLPFC, while choline/creatine levels increased on the right side. (Open-label pre-post study, n = 21, including 10 treated with MPH, 2 months, E 2b.)184
- Glutamate, glutamine, and glutamate-plus-glutamine-to-myo-inositol ratios in the ACC (higher in untreated ADHD than in controls and than after 6 to 8 weeks of OROS-MPH at an average dose of 54 mg/day, not significant) (Open-label study with a control group, N = 22, n = 10, 6 to 8 weeks, manufacturer-funded, E 2b.)185
(E 2b): In animal studies, MPH altered glutamatergic transmission
- at NMDA receptors via:
- At a low dose (0.5 mg/kg), NMDA receptor-mediated EPSCs in the PFC of adolescent rats were enhanced via adrenergic receptors and SNAP-25, resulting in improved temporal sequence memory and attention. A high dose (10 mg/kg) suppressed NMDA- and AMPA-receptor-mediated EPSCs and increased locomotion. (Animal study, rats, E 2b.)115
- Enhancement of NMDA receptor-mediated transmission in pyramidal cells (layers V and VI) of the medial PFC at higher concentrations, in a catecholamine-independent manner via sigma-1 receptors (blocked by sigma-1 antagonists, but not by D1/5 or α2 antagonists) and via PLC, IP3 receptors, and PKC. Locomotor activation by higher doses of MPH also depended on sigma-1 receptors. (Animal study, rats, mice, E 2b.)186
- Potentiation of NMDA-induced, but not AMPA-induced, excitation of PFC neurons (1 to 3 mg/kg i.v., as well as d-amphetamine and atomoxetine). The increase in firing rate induced by MPH was D1-dependent. (Animal study, rats, E 2b.)187
- A reduction in the NMDA receptor subunits NR1 and NR2B (but not NR2A) in the PFC of juvenile rats following a single dose (1 mg/kg i.p.), accompanied by smaller NMDA- and larger AMPA-receptor-mediated EPSCs, as well as more frequent and stronger LTP (animal study, rats, E 2b.)188
- Dose-dependent changes in NMDA receptor binding ([3H]MK-801) in numerous regions (including the prelimbic, insular, and motor cortex; dorsolateral striatum; nucleus accumbens; hippocampus; amygdala; thalamus) after 13 weeks of oral administration in adolescent rats (4/10 and 30/60 mg/kg, respectively); this effect was no longer observed after 4 weeks of abstinence (animal study, rats, 13 weeks, E 2b.)189
- Effect on NMDA-receptor-mediated EPSCs in dopaminergic VTA neurons only at high doses; no effect on AMPA/kainate-receptor-mediated EPSCs (amphetamine enhanced both, particularly AMPA/kainate) (Animal study, brain sections, rats, E 2b.)190
- at AMPA receptors via:
- A reduction in stop-signal reaction time (SSRT, 1 mg/kg s.c.) was observed only in rats with a long baseline SSRT. An AMPA receptor antagonist (NASPM) in the PFC or a Src kinase inhibitor (PP2) reversed this effect. (Animal study, rats, E 2b.)191
- on extracellular glutamate through:
- An increase in tonic glutamate in the prelimbic cortex (2 mg/kg s.c.) was observed after an intermediate treatment duration only in SHR, and after 11 days in both SHR and WKY. The amplitude of phasic glutamate signals decreased only in SHR. (Animal study, SHR, WKY, rats, 11 days, E 2b.)192
- Increased glutamate levels in the cerebrospinal fluid and reduced glutamate uptake in the PFC (GLAST and GLT-1 unchanged) with decreased Na+/K+-ATPase activity following 2 mg/kg i.p. daily from day 15 to 45 of life, interpreted by the authors as excitotoxicity (animal study, rats, 30 days, E 2b.)193
2.2. Effect of MPH on Cholesterol Metabolism in the OFC
Implications for People with ADHD
In an animal model of ADHD with hyperactivity (SHR rats), several metabolites in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) were altered compared to control animals. These are involved in cholesterol metabolism. In this study, methylphenidate (MPH) normalized two of the altered metabolites, including cholesterol itself. Levels of some proteins involved in cholesterol metabolism were reduced in the animals and were increased by MPH, while one enzyme involved in this process remained unchanged under MPH treatment.
This is a single animal study. It remains unclear whether the findings can be applied to people with ADHD. The study examined the prefrontal cortex as a whole, not specifically the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC).
A study found 12 altered metabolic metabolites in the PFC of SHR rats, which are considered a model for ADHD-HI, compared to WKY rats, which are considered a model for unaffected individuals, including: (Animal study, N = 30, rats, SHR, E 2b.)194
- 3-hydroxymethylglutaric acid
- 3-phosphoglyceric acid
- Adenosine monophosphate
- Cholesterol
- Lanosterin
- o-phosphoethanolamine
MPH (2 mg/kg/day) normalized 3-hydroxymethylglutaric acid and cholesterol.
Scientific: Cholesterol Metabolism Enzymes in the PFC of SHR Rats Treated with MPH
The modified metabolites are part of the cholesterol metabolic pathways.
The SHR found the following in the PFC regarding this
- reduced activity of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase
- unchanged by MPH
- reduced expression of sterol regulator element-binding protein 2
- increased by MPH
- reduced expression of the ATP-binding cassette transporter A1
- increased by MPH
2.3. Effect of MPH on the HPA axis
Implications for People with ADHD
The HPA axis (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis) is the body’s stress hormone system. Its most important hormone is cortisol. A review article suggested that stimulants (methylphenidate and amphetamine-based medications) increase the activity of the HPA axis.
The individual studies painted a mixed picture. In one study, methylphenidate (MPH) taken for less than 3 months increased the morning cortisol surge after waking up. This is considered a sign of a more responsive stress axis. In healthy individuals without ADHD, MPH increased measures of stress such as salivary cortisol and blood pressure. MPH altered the activation of brain regions under stress but did not prevent stress from reducing goal-directed behavior.
In a study of children with ADHD, morning cortisol levels in saliva were elevated after 1 month of MPH treatment and subsequently dropped to moderate levels. Higher levels were associated with improved attention performance in that study. In contrast, other studies found no change in cortisol levels—neither in blood nor in saliva—after periods ranging from 12 weeks to 6 months of MPH treatment. In another study, children taking MPH did not differ in salivary cortisol levels from untreated children with ADHD. In healthy individuals, cortisol rose only slightly after a single high dose.
Overall, the effect of MPH on cortisol appears to be minimal or nonexistent. The findings are somewhat contradictory. Differences in the timing of measurements, the site of measurement (blood or saliva), the duration of treatment, and the study groups make comparisons difficult.
Stimulants (methylphenidate and amphetamine-based medications) are thought to increase the activity of the HPA axis. (Narrative review, E 4)195
MPH increased the cortisol wake-up response over a 3-month period, which is a sign of increased reactivity of the HPA axis. (Open-label before-and-after study, n = 59, 3 months, E 2b.)196
In healthy individuals, MPH increased physiological measures of stress (salivary cortisol and blood pressure). MPH modulated the effects of stress on the activation of brain regions associated with goal-directed behavior, including the insula, putamen, amygdala, mPFC, the frontal pole, and the OFC. However, MPH did not modulate stress’s tendency to reduce goal-directed behavior. (RCT, N = 100, E 1b.)197
Cortisol levels in children and adolescents with ADHD treated with MPH were found to be
- Elevated in morning saliva after 1 month, then decreased to a moderate level and correlated positively with CPT performance over 6 months; controls remained unchanged (Prospective cohort study with a control group, N = 100, n = 50, 6 months, E 2b.)198
- no difference in saliva levels compared with untreated children with ADHD (however, levels were higher at bedtime among those taking atomoxetine) (cross-sectional study, N = 188, n = 147, E 3.)199
- No significant change in morning serum levels after approximately 4 months; morning cortisol levels were lower before treatment than in the control group (Prospective case-control study with a before-and-after comparison, N = 81, n = 40, approximately 4 months, E 2b.)200
(E 1b): The effect of MPH on cortisol was minimal or absent. It was found that
- A slight increase in plasma cortisol following a single 60-mg dose in healthy subjects (Emax 648 nmol/L, placebo 630 nmol/L, MDMA 942 nmol/L). Prolactin and oxytocin increased only with MDMA, not with MPH. (Double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover RCT, n = 24, single dose, E 1b.)201
- No change in plasma cortisol after 12 weeks of MPH treatment in boys with ADHD (7.7 to 9.0 µg/dl, p = 0.345) (Open-label randomized controlled trial comparing MPH with bupropion, N = 22, n = 12, 12 weeks, Phase 2b.)202
- No change in morning salivary cortisol after 6 months of MPH (mean 12.47 mg/day) in children with ADHD (open-label before-and-after study, N = 58, n = 40, 6 months, E 2b.)203
2.4. Effects of MPH on the Autonomic Nervous System (Sympathetic / Parasympathetic)
Implications for People with ADHD
The autonomic nervous system controls unconscious bodily functions such as heart rate, blood pressure, and sweating. The sympathetic nervous system activates the body, while the parasympathetic nervous system (vagus nerve) promotes rest and recovery. The balance between these two systems is measured, among other things, by heart rate variability (HRV, the variation in the intervals between heartbeats), skin conductance, and pupil diameter.
In one study, children with ADHD who were not taking medication showed insufficient activation of the sympathetic nervous system and a predominance of the parasympathetic nervous system. Methylphenidate (MPH) shifted this balance toward the levels seen in children without ADHD, though it did not fully match those levels. Several studies found reduced skin conductance and smaller pupil size in children with ADHD as signs of under-arousal (hypoarousal). Under MPH, these values no longer differed from those of the control group. A brief slowing of the heart rate—which typically occurs in non-affected individuals following errors—was also absent in untreated children with ADHD and was largely restored under MPH.
MPH increased heart rate and blood pressure without causing clinically significant changes in the ECG. In healthy individuals, this increase following a single high dose was comparable to that observed with modafinil and MDMA. A marker of susceptibility to cardiac arrhythmias was not significantly elevated after more than one year of treatment.
Findings regarding heart rate variability are contradictory. A meta-analysis found no significant change in resting HRV with MPH in children and adolescents with ADHD, though the evidence was very uncertain. Some individual studies found reduced vagal tone in untreated children with ADHD, which approached that of the control group when treated with MPH. Others found a predominance of the parasympathetic nervous system, which decreased with MPH. Whether MPH alters HRV—and in which direction—remains unclear at this time.
Children with ADHD who were not taking medication showed underactivation of the sympathetic nervous system and overactivation of the parasympathetic nervous system in the sympathovagal balance (as measured by heart rate variability (HRV) and skin conductance) compared to controls. MPH shifted the autonomic balance toward the values seen in non-affected individuals, without quite reaching those levels. At the same time, MPH eliminated the normal shift in balance toward the sympathetic nervous system that occurs during focused attention. (Case-control study comparing conditions with and without MPH, N = 37, n = 19, E 2b.)204
(E 2b): MPH increased heart rate and blood pressure without clinically relevant ECG changes (frequency-corrected QT and JT intervals). (Open-label before-and-after study, n = 19, E 2b.)205 * (Open-label study, n = 114, 6 months, E 2b.)*206
In healthy subjects, a single dose of 60 mg MPH increased heart rate (Emax 91.6 vs. 73.1 beats/min with placebo) and systolic blood pressure (145 vs. 135 mm Hg) to a degree comparable to that of MDMA (125 mg) and modafinil (600 mg). (double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover RCT, n = 24, single dose, E 1b.)201
The statement made elsewhere— (website, E 4)207 —that methylphenidate does not alter the HVR is not found in the cited source. (Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association, E 4)208
Scientific: Heart rate variability, skin conductance, pupil diameter, and evoked heart rate during MPH
(E 2a): The effect of MPH on the parasympathetic nervous system (vagal tone, measured via heart rate variability (HRV) or respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA)) was inconsistent. A meta-analysis found no significant changes in the time- and frequency-domain indices of resting HRV due to MPH in children and adolescents with ADHD, with very low certainty of evidence for all endpoints and a high risk of bias. (Systematic review with meta-analysis; full text not available to us; E 2a.)209 Individual studies found
- reduced vagal tone in untreated children with ADHD compared to controls, which approached control levels with MPH (24-hour ECG): (Pilot study with a control group, N = 42, n = 23, E 3.)210 * (Pilot study with a control group, N = 50, n = 31, E 3.)*211
- rMSSD without MPH: 26.1 ms; with MPH: 36.7 ms; controls: 44.5 ms
- pNN50: 6.5% without MPH, 14.2% with MPH, controls 21.5%
- Reduction primarily between 5 p.m. and 6 a.m.; levels under MPH treatment approached those of the control group (pilot study with a control group, N = 42, n = 23, E 3.)210
- a shift in autonomic balance toward the parasympathetic system after more than one year of treatment with sustained-release MPH (mean 37.64 mg/day) compared with controls (higher rMSSD and HF, lower LF/HF ratio, p = 0.02, 0.001 and 0.01, respectively), particularly during sleep. Microvolt T-wave alternans (a marker of susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias) was not significantly elevated. (Case-control study, N = 95, n = 40; full text not available to us; E 3.)212
- reduced vagal tone after 12 weeks of MPH (mean 0.70 mg/kg) in children with ADHD (RMSSD from 47.65 to 38.88 ms, p = 0.018, HF from 6.14 to 5.70 ln ms², p = 0.043), accompanied by an increased heart rate (from 86.38 to 93.54/min, p = 0.007). The authors interpreted this as a shift away from parasympathetic dominance in ADHD. (Open-label before-and-after study, n = 37, 12 weeks, E 2b.)213
- No change in RSA with OROS-MPH compared with placebo (6.20 vs. 6.26). Under placebo, the RSA was reduced compared to controls (6.26 vs. 6.85, ηp² 0.07); under MPH, there was no longer a significant difference compared to controls. (Double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study with a control group, N = 256, n = 157, E 1b.)214
(E 1b): In children with ADHD, MPH normalized markers of reduced sympathetic activation (hypoarousal):
- Resting skin conductance (EDA) was lower in the placebo group compared with the control group (3.80 vs. 5.03, p < 0.04); under OROS-MPH, 4.78 and no longer different from controls (MPH vs. placebo, p = 0.058) (Double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study with a control group, N = 256, n = 157, E 1b.)214
- Resting skin conductance and skin conductance responses to neutral and emotional images were reduced in boys with ADHD not taking MPH; in those taking MPH (0.27 mg/kg one hour beforehand), these responses did not differ from those of controls (case-control study, N = 102, n = 80, E 3.)215
- Pupil diameter (a marker of noradrenergic arousal) was reduced during a visuospatial working memory task without MPH, increased under MPH (p = 0.003), and was no longer different from that of controls. Pupil size correlated with performance (rho = 0.63) and inversely with reaction time variability (rho = −0.68). Performance and reaction time variability did not change significantly under MPH. (Case-control study comparing conditions with and without MPH, N = 50, n = 17, E 3.)216
The deceleration in heart rate (evoked heart rate) that occurs during error checks was absent in untreated children with ADHD across all feedback conditions. Under MPH, it normalized in the absence of feedback and during punishment, but not completely during reward. (Study with randomized assignment to MPH or medication withdrawal and a control group, N = 50, n = 32, E 2a.)217
2.5. Effect of MPH on Androgens
Implications for People with ADHD
Androgens are male sex hormones such as testosterone. A review article suggested that stimulants (methylphenidate and amphetamine-based medications) reduce androgen levels. According to animal studies, elevated testosterone levels may reduce blood flow to the prefrontal cortex, thereby disrupting memory processes. ADHD has also been linked to a genetic variant of the androgen receptor. Overall, little is known about the role of androgens in ADHD.
Recent studies in children with ADHD found no change in testosterone levels with methylphenidate (MPH) at standard doses. This was true both over a 4-week period and over 12 months. Other sex hormones and pubertal development also remained unchanged over 12 months. The duration of treatment, the specific formulation, and the dose of MPH did not play a role in these findings. These results contradict the assumption that MPH reduces androgen levels. To date, this assumption has been based solely on a review article.
In contrast, levels of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)—a precursor to sex hormones—and its sulfate (DHEA-S) increased in two small open-label studies involving children with ADHD who were taking MPH. Cortisol levels remained unchanged. In one of the studies, the increase was not associated with behavioral improvement.
Stimulants (methylphenidate and amphetamine-based medications) reduce androgen levels.
Preclinical data on the role of androgens in the pathogenesis of ADHD suggest that elevated testosterone levels may reduce cerebral blood flow in the PFC by decreasing the levels of alpha-estrogen receptors and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). This may disrupt memory processes. There is a correlation between ADHD and a polymorphism in the androgen receptor gene that leads to its increased expression. Nevertheless, little is known about the role of androgens in ADHD. (Narrative review, E 4)195
(E 2a): At standard doses, MPH did not alter testosterone or other gonadal hormones in children with ADHD:
- No change in salivary testosterone after 4 weeks of MPH (mean 18.1 mg/day, p = 0.389; untreated control group, p = 0.488); no correlation with the daily dose (Prospective, non-randomized, controlled study, N = 203, n = 132 evaluated, 4 weeks, E 2a.)218
- No interaction between group (short- or long-term MPH versus untreated) and time for SHBG, FSH, LH, estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, free testosterone, and prolactin, as well as for Tanner stage over 12 months (mean 0.78 mg/kg). The duration, formulation, and dose of MPH did not influence the hormonal profiles. (Prospective cohort study with an untreated control group, N = 216, n = 146, 12 months, E 2a.)219
(E 2b): MPH increased levels of the androgen precursor hormone dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfate (DHEA-S) in children with ADHD:
- Plasma DHEA-S levels increased from 88.1 to 105.3 µg/dl (p = 0.032) after 12 weeks in boys, while cortisol levels remained unchanged (Open-label randomized controlled trial comparing MPH with bupropion, N = 22, n = 12, 12 weeks, Phase 2b.)202
- Salivary DHEA levels increased by 9.05 pg/ml (p = 0.027) and the DHEA/cortisol ratio increased by 32.42 (p = 0.007) after 6 months, while cortisol levels remained unchanged. These changes did not correlate with improvement on the CBCL. (Open-label before-and-after study, N = 58, n = 40, 6 months, E 2b.)203
2.6. Effect of MPH on kynurenines
MPH appeared to improve the homeostatic balance of various kynurenines in children with ADHD (increased plasma levels of kynurenic acid and xanthurenic acid; decreased urinary excretion of quinolinic acid and nicotinamide, the latter observed only in children without depressive symptoms). (case-control study with a before-and-after comparison, N = 179, n = 130, 4.6 months, E 2b.)220
2.7. Effect of MPH on ARAS
Methylphenidate increases the arousal of the reticular activating system (RAS). (Textbook, E 4)221 This occasionally leads to sleep disturbances and may also be relevant to improvements in attention and behavior. (Textbook, E 4.)221
2.8. Effect of MPH on Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress
Implications for People with ADHD
Oxidative stress occurs when the body produces more aggressive oxygen and nitrogen compounds (reactive oxygen species, free radicals) than the body’s defense systems can break down. These compounds can damage cells and their powerhouses (mitochondria). Studies have found elevated levels of oxidative stress in children with ADHD.
In a 3-month study involving humans, methylphenidate (MPH) improved balance. Markers of oxidative stress decreased, and protective enzymes became more active. In another study involving children, several markers decreased, but the composite oxidative stress index did not decrease significantly. The changes were not associated with an improvement in symptoms. In a study, untreated adults with ADHD had elevated blood nitrate levels, whereas adults treated with MPH had normal levels.
Animal and cell studies yielded mixed results. The effect depended on age, dose, duration of treatment, and route of administration. Young animals were more susceptible. In rats, a single dose increased free radicals in certain brain regions in young animals, whereas chronic administration did not. In retinal cells, MPH caused oxidative stress and mitochondrial disorders under normal conditions; under inflammatory conditions, however, it had a protective effect. In ADHD model rats, MPH reduced oxidative stress when administered orally, whereas it had an adverse effect in control animals. In contrast, another study using ADHD model rats found increased oxidative stress following intraperitoneal injection. In mice, high doses administered over 12 weeks led to increased levels of harmful dopamine breakdown products and reduced levels of the protective molecule glutathione.
Review studies have described a dose-dependent effect. Low doses had no effect or induced adaptive responses. High doses and prolonged exposure, particularly when the substance was misused, promoted oxidative damage and cell death. It remains unclear whether the findings from animal studies can be applied to the treatment of people with ADHD.
For more information on oxidative stress, see Oxidative Stress and ADHD Status
(E 3): Oxidative stress is elevated in ADHD. (case-control study, N = 154, n = 76, E 3)222 * (case-control study, N = 72, n = 48, E 3)*223
For more information on oxidative stress, see Oxidative Stress and ADHD
MPH improved the redox profile in humans by reducing levels of advanced protein oxidation products, lipid peroxidation, and nitrite plus nitrate (NOx), and increased the activity of the ROS-scavenging enzymes glutathione reductase and catalase. (Open-label before-and-after study, n = 59, 3 months, E 2b)196
Scientific: Superoxide, Mitochondria, and Glial Cells Under the Influence of MPH in Animal and In Vitro Studies
Single dose of MPH: (animal study, rats, E 2b)224
- increased superoxide (ROS) levels in the cerebellum of young rats at both low and high doses, and in the hippocampus only at high doses (10 mg/kg)
- did not affect superoxide in adult rats
Chronic administration (as is common with ADHD medications): (animal study, rats, E 2b)224
- did not affect superoxide in young rats
- Reduced superoxide levels in the cerebellum of adult rats at lower doses
MPH (0.1 mM) in vitro on retinal cells (In vitro and animal study, retinal cell cultures, rats, SHR, E 2b.)225
- protected the viability of retinal cells
- induced oxidative stress through the activation of the NOX2 and PI3K/AKT/DRP1 signaling pathways
- induced mitochondrial dysfunction
- Reduced mitochondria
- Increased mitochondrial fragmentation
- Impaired membrane potential
- Reduced oxygen consumption
- A shift in metabolism toward a glycolytic metabolic profile
- in inflammatory conditions
- boosted antioxidant defense
- reduced oxidative stress
- reduced intracellular calcium levels
- improved the structure and function of the mitochondria
MPH (1.5 mg/kg/day, oral) caused * In rats (in vitro and animal study, retinal cell cultures, rats, SHR, E 2b.)*225
- at SHR
- Reduces oxidative stress
- Improved mitochondrial function
- for WKY (control tree)
- adverse effects
MPH (0.01 to 2 mM) promoted astrogliosis, oxidative/nitrosative stress, and the release of TNF in astrocyte cultures, consistent with findings in the hippocampus of WKY rats receiving chronic doses of 1.5 mg/kg/day. MPH had no significant effect on microglial cells other than impaired migration. (In vitro and animal study, N9 microglial cell line, astrocytes, rats (WKY); full text not available to us; E 2b.)226
(E 2b): In humans, the following were found under MPH
- a reduction in total oxidant status (TOS), total antioxidant status (TAS), superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), and oxidized LDL (Ox-LDL) after 3 months in previously untreated children aged 6 to 11 years. The oxidative stress index (TOS/TAS) did not decrease significantly (p = 0.066). The percentage changes in the markers did not correlate with symptom improvement. (Prospective observational study, n = 39, 3 months, full text not available to us, E 2b.)227
- Plasma nitrate levels were normal in MPH-treated adults, whereas untreated adults with ADHD had elevated plasma nitrate levels compared with controls (60.3 vs. 44.4 µM, p = 0.002). MDA, as a marker of oxidative stress, did not differ between the groups. (Cross-sectional case-control study, N = 61, n = 29; full text not available to us; E 3.)228
(E 2b): In animal studies, MPH caused
- In adult SHR (2 mg/kg i.p., single dose or for 28 days), there was increased lipid peroxidation (TBARS) and protein carbonyls, as well as decreased catalase and SOD activities in several brain regions (cerebellum, PFC, hippocampus, striatum, cortex). Following chronic administration, SOD activity increased in the cerebellum. Energy metabolism (respiratory chain complexes) was altered. (Animal study, SHR, 1 or 28 days, E 2b.)229
- in mice (1 or 10 mg/kg i.p. twice daily, 5 days a week for 12 weeks), a dose-dependent increase in the formation of dopamine quinones in the striatum (the high dose was approximately 1,700 times that of saline) and a dose-dependent reduction in the antioxidant glutathione, which was exacerbated following administration of the Parkinson’s toxin MPTP (animal study, mice, 12 weeks, E 2b.)230
(E 4): Review articles based primarily on data from animal experiments cited the following effects of MPH: changes in energy metabolism (Krebs cycle, respiratory chain, ATP, Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase), increased formation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, altered antioxidant defense, inflammation, and apoptosis. These effects depended on age, duration of treatment, route of administration, and dose; young animals were more susceptible. (Narrative review of animal studies; full text not available to us; E 4.)231 The effect on mitochondria followed a hormetic dose-response relationship: Low doses were neutral or induced adaptive responses, while high doses and prolonged exposure (particularly misuse) promoted the formation of reactive oxygen species, disorders in the respiratory chain, and apoptosis. (Narrative review, E 4.)232
2.9. Effect of MPH on S100B
Implications for People with ADHD
S100B is a protein produced primarily by glial cells (support and nourishing cells of the brain). In a study, children with ADHD had elevated S100B levels in their blood compared to controls. The authors saw this as consistent with the hypothesis that inflammation in the brain damages glial cells and thereby alters dopamine transmission. A combination treatment of methylphenidate (MPH), melatonin, and omega-3 fatty acids further increased S100B levels over 6 months, while simultaneously improving attention. The authors considered this increase to require further explanation. The study did not include a control treatment, and the effect of MPH alone was not examined separately.
In adolescent rats, long-term administration of high-dose MPH over 3 months increased the activation of microglia (immune cells of the brain) in many brain regions. The authors considered both doses studied to be clinically relevant. After one month without MPH, the activation observed with the high dose had disappeared; with the low dose, it was then found in the frontal lobe and in a part of the striatum (caudate-putamen).
A short-term increase in glial activity is beneficial, for example, in clearing away cellular debris and fighting off infections. In contrast, the consequences of persistently elevated activity resulting from chronic inflammation are damage to nerve cells and synapses and contribution to memory impairment. However, memory loss has not been reported in the treatment of ADHD with MPH.
Children with ADHD had higher serum S100B levels than controls. A triple therapy (TT) consisting of methylphenidate (MPH), melatonin (aMT), and omega-3 fatty acids (ω-3 PUFAs) further increased S100B levels after 3 and 6 months, while simultaneously improving attention. The authors interpreted the elevated baseline value as consistent with the hypothesis that a neuroinflammatory cause of ADHD impairs glial function and thereby alters dopaminergic neurotransmission. (Clinical trial without a control group, N = 127, n = 62, 6 months, E 2b.)233
Chronic oral administration of MPH over 3 months increased microglial activation in numerous cortical and subcortical regions in adolescent rats at high doses (30/60 mg/kg, which the authors state is a clinically relevant dose in rodents). After one month of abstinence, this effect was no longer present at the high dose; at the low dose (4/10 mg/kg), however, increased activation was observed in the prefrontal cortex and ventromedial caudate-putamen. (Animal study, rats, 3 months, E 2b.)234 Increased glial activity is beneficial in the short term for clearing debris and fighting infections. Chronically elevated glial activity (gliosis) can be harmful if it results from chronic neuroinflammation. Chronically activated glial cells continuously release pro-inflammatory signaling molecules (cytokines such as TNF-alpha), cytotoxic substances, and aggressive oxygen radicals. These directly attack and destroy healthy neighboring neurons as well as their protective layers (myelin sheaths). While microglia are actually supposed to remove cellular waste, when their activity is chronically elevated, they begin to massively break down healthy synapses (nerve connection points). This is a major driver of brain fog and memory loss. The latter is precisely what is not reported in the treatment of ADHD with MPH.
2.10. Effects of MPH on Brain Networks
Implications for People with ADHD
The brain functions in networks—that is, in groups of brain regions that work together. The degree to which these regions are interconnected is referred to as connectivity. Numerous studies have examined how methylphenidate (MPH) alters these connections. The studies varied widely in design and yielded differing results. So far, this has not yielded a consistent picture of how MPH affects these networks. Many studies were small, and some are available only as preprints that have not yet been peer-reviewed.
Nevertheless, some findings were consistent. In several studies, MPH made the abnormal neural connections seen in ADHD resemble those of people without ADHD. According to a review, stimulants improved the activation of the networks needed for a task and reduced disorders caused by the Default Mode Network (DMN). The DMN is a network that is primarily active during rest. In ADHD, attention is directed more toward one’s own interests. In one study, MPH also brought attention control in line with that of people without ADHD, even during tasks of little interest. The majority of studies in a systematic review found improvements in areas of the DMN under MPH.
The effects of MPH varied depending on age and duration of treatment. In boys and men, the same single dose caused changes—some of them opposite—in the connections between the striatum and the thalamus. After 4 months of treatment, lasting changes were observed in adults but not in children.
MPH also increased spontaneous activity in the nucleus accumbens—a region of the reward system—and in cognitive control networks in children with ADHD. This was accompanied by more stable sustained attention. After 3 months of treatment, the previously reduced response of the nucleus accumbens to small rewards normalized in children and adolescents.
It is not yet clear which of these changes in the network is crucial for symptom improvement.
2.10.1. MPH and Connectivity Between Brain Regions
Implications for People with ADHD
Functional connectivity describes how closely the activity of different brain regions is linked. These connections are not rigid but adapt to the demands of the moment. The balance between flexibility and stability is largely regulated by dopamine and norepinephrine, on which MPH acts.
In a study of children with ADHD, MPH made the brain’s network organization more stable. The greater the degree of stabilization, the better the children’s performance on the tasks. Another study suggested that MPH corrected the impaired network flexibility seen in ADHD. Exactly how MPH alters the balance between flexibility and stability therefore remains unclear.
In several studies, a single dose of MPH caused changes in brain chemistry in children with ADHD that were similar to those seen in children without ADHD. In adults, these changes persisted after 4 months of treatment, with no evidence of a tolerance effect. MPH also altered numerous brain chemical levels in healthy individuals. A rapid rise in dopamine following intravenous administration had a different effect than a slow rise following oral administration. A very large study of children found that stimulants primarily influenced networks related to alertness and reward, not the actual attention networks. Stimulants also reversed the consequences of sleep deprivation on connectivity and school grades in those networks.
Several studies have found associations between connectivity and response to MPH. In adults, connectivity changed after 6 weeks only in those who responded to MPH. In one study, a change triggered by a single dose was associated with a better response after 2 months. It remains to be seen whether this approach will allow for the prediction of treatment response in the future.
Overall, the studies were designed very differently and, according to a systematic review, did not meet current standards for reproducibility.
The effects of medications (MPH, amphetamine, atomoxetine) on resting-state connectivity in ADHD were highly heterogeneous in terms of study designs, analyses, and results and could not be synthesized using meta-analysis. The numerous regions and networks involved (including the DMN in 6 studies), some of which correlated with clinical improvement, did not yield a coherent mechanism of action. The studies did not meet current reproducibility standards. (Systematic review, k = 9, N = 344, n = 196, E 2b.)235
Stimulants optimized the integration of task-related networks via dopamine and norepinephrine, increased perceived salience, and reduced interference from the DMN. Acute administration reduced fronto-striato-parieto-cerebellar abnormalities in ADHD during tasks and at rest. The effects of longer-term treatment remained controversial. The evidence was limited by small sample sizes, lack of or short follow-up, and methodological heterogeneity. (Narrative review, E 4.)236
PET and MRI helped clarify the molecular targets of MPH, the kinetics of its various dosage forms, and the networks and connectivity activated by MPH. (Narrative Review, E 4.)237
Scientific: Interhemispheric EEG Coherence in ADHD
Changes in interhemispheric connectivity have been reported in ADHD: (case-control study, E 3.)238
- reduced interhemispheric coherence in the delta band in frontal brain regions
- Increased coherence in the delta band in posterior regions (only with eyes open)
- increased coherence in the theta band in central regions
Functional connectivity between brain regions is not static; rather, it changes depending on the demands placed on the brain. The rate at which functional connectivity changes reflects the brain’s flexibility relative to its stability.
The balance between flexibility and stability in brain function is largely regulated by catecholamines. MPH acts specifically on the catecholamines dopamine and norepinephrine.
MPH slowed the change in functional connectivity, thereby reducing the flexibility of the entire brain. The greater the decrease in whole-brain flexibility under the influence of MPH, the greater the improvements in task performance. (Preprint, single-dose within-subjects study, E 2b)239
Scientific: EEG network analysis following stimulus presentation under MPH
In one study, methylphenidate normalized the reduced global connectivity observed in ADHD 400 to 700 ms after a stimulus and prevented the increase in network segregation (segregation) of networks that occurred 100 to 700 ms after the stimulus. These global changes occurred primarily in the task-relevant frontal and parietal regions. The changes in network connectivity relative to baseline were more pronounced and sustained in people with ADHD taking methylphenidate and in controls than in people with ADHD not taking methylphenidate. The study’s results suggest that methylphenidate corrects the impaired network flexibility observed in ADHD. (Double-blind randomized crossover study, N = 37, n = 19, E 1b.)240
Scientific: Connectivity findings after a single dose, after prolonged treatment, and in healthy individuals
(E 1b): MPH altered functional connectivity
- in children and adolescents with ADHD, following a single dose, by:
- Reduction in resting-state connectivity within a large occipital, temporal, and cerebellar network (visual and executive networks, DMN, 20 mg). This connectivity was elevated in the placebo group compared with controls but no longer differed under MPH. (Randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study, N = 31, n = 16, single dose, E 1b.)241
- Increased regional homogeneity (ReHo) in the bilateral ventral PFC and the vermis, as well as decreased ReHo in the right parietal and visual regions (10 mg). Under MPH, there were no longer any ReHo differences compared to controls. (Randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study, N = 55, n = 23, single dose, E 1b.)242
- Normalization of fronto-striatal and fronto-cerebellar connectivity, as well as parieto-temporal activation during sustained attention, and the excessive orbitofrontal activation during reward (0.3 mg/kg, medication-naive children) (Randomized, double-blind crossover study, N = 26, n = 13, single dose, E 1b.)243
- Resolution of hyperconnectivity between the right superior parietal gyrus and the left operculum/insula during the n-back test (as well as under atomoxetine). Only under MPH (0.3 mg/kg) did fronto-temporo-parietal and fronto-striato-thalamic connectivity increase, without any effects on performance. (Randomized, double-blind crossover study, N = 39, n = 19, single dose, E 1b.)244
- Alignment of the average controllability (which was elevated under placebo) and modal controllability (which was reduced under placebo) (Network Control Theory) of attention, reward, and somatomotor networks with those of controls (0.3 mg/kg), interpreted by the authors as stabilization of network dynamics (Randomized, double-blind, crossover study, N = 46, n = 19, single dose, E 1b.)245
- Reduced connectivity and centrality of the striatum and thalamus in stimulant-naive boys (ages 10 to 12), but increased connectivity and centrality in stimulant-naive men (ages 23 to 40, 0.5 mg/kg), with no significant effects in the dACC and PFC (pre-post study with a control group, N = 122, n = 99, single dose, E 2b.)246
- in cases of ADHD following prolonged treatment with:
- increased connectivity between the left frontoparietal network and the left insula, as well as between the right frontoparietal network and the brainstem, lower clustering coefficients globally and, among other areas, in the cerebellum; bilaterally increased ALFF in the superior parietal region and decreased ALFF in the right inferior fronto-temporal region after 12 weeks in medication-naive children. These changes explained 27.1% of the variance in improvement on the ADHD Rating Scale. (Open-label pre-post study, n = 20, 12 weeks, Phase 2b.)247
- sustained increase in whole-brain efficiency (p = 0.01) and DMN whole-brain connectivity strength (p = 0.03) after 4 months of MPH (not placebo) in adults, with no effects observed in children (p > 0.17). The acute connectivity response to MPH remained stable in adults, with no evidence of neurobiological tolerance. (Preprint, secondary analysis of an RCT, n = 99, 4 months, E 1b.)248
- Increase in resting-state connectivity between the right nucleus accumbens and the somatomotor network after 2 years of real-world stimulant exposure (ABCD cohort), similar to the development observed in children without ADHD, with no association with reliable symptom reduction (Observational study, n = 179, of whom 81 were on stimulants, 2 years, E 2b.)249
- in healthy individuals after a single dose, due to:
- Increased connectivity between the dorsal attention network and the thalamus (40 mg, men). Frontoparietal and executive networks showed greater connectivity to sensorimotor and visual areas and less to cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical loops; sensorimotor networks showed the opposite pattern. (Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, n = 54, single dose, E 1b.)250
- Reduced connectivity of the lateral PFC with motor and somatosensory subregions of the thalamus, with no change in connectivity to premotor, prefrontal, and temporal subregions (20 mg) (Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, N = 60, n = 29, single dose, E 1b.)251
- Enhanced connectivity from the thalamus and dorsal striatum to the primary motor cortex and memory circuits (amygdala, hippocampus) with attenuated prefrontal connectivity (45 mg), interpreted by the authors as exceeding the optimal level (Controlled, non-randomized study, N = 48, n = 24, single dose, E 2a.)252
- a stronger high-attention network and a weaker low-attention network (connectome-based predictive modeling) compared with unmedicated controls (45 mg) (Controlled, non-randomized study, n = 24 with MPH, single dose, E 2a.)253
- Opposing patterns of global connectivity during rapid (intravenous) and slow (60 mg oral) dopamine increases (rho = −0.54). The “fast versus slow” patterns spatially corresponded to D1 receptor distribution (rho = 0.22). Hippocampal connectivity during the rapid rise correlated negatively with the perceived “high” (r = −0.68). (Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, PET-fMRI, n = 20, single dose, E 1b.)254
- An increase in global connectivity density (gFCD) and a decrease in the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) were observed with reduced D2/3 receptor availability in the putamen; this effect was pronounced following intravenous administration (0.25 mg/kg, Cohen’s d > 1.6), and weak after oral administration (60 mg, d < 0.6). The gFCD depended on the magnitude and rate of the dopamine increase. (Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, PET-fMRI, n = 20, single dose, E 1b.)255
- in children taking stimulants (ABCD cohort), validated in healthy subjects (40 mg MPH), by:
- Changes in connectivity in sensorimotor regions that corresponded to patterns of arousal, longer nighttime sleep, and NET expression, as well as changes in the salience and parietal memory networks, but not in attention networks (such as the dorsal attention network). Stimulants reversed the effects of sleep deprivation on connectivity and school grades. (cohort analysis, n = 11,875 children, and precision imaging study, n = 5 adults, E 2b.)256
2.10.1.1. Connectivity and Responsiveness to MPH
MPH increased resting-state functional connectivity in three subcortical-cortical and cerebellar-cortical clusters. MPH-induced increases in resting-state functional connectivity between the vermis (Lobe 6) and the left precentral gyrus correlated with a higher likelihood of responding to MPH after 2 months and with an improvement in both inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive symptoms. (Single-blind, non-randomized, placebo-controlled trial, n = 56, E 2a)257
In stimulant-naive adults with ADHD, MPH altered intrinsic functional connectivity over 6 weeks only in responders (n = 36), but not in nonresponders (n = 17). The intrinsic connectivity of the bilateral putamen (a seed in the salience network) approached the level observed in healthy controls. (Prospective before-and-after study with a control group, N = 103, n = 53, 6 weeks, E 2b.)258
A poorer response to stimulants (MPH in 67%, amphetamine-based medications in 33% of measurements) was associated with an atypical age-related increase in resting-state connectivity within the cingulo-opercular network from childhood to adolescence in children and adolescents, compared with better responders and controls. No such association was found for striato-thalamic networks or the default mode network. (Longitudinal study, N = 252, n = 110 with ADHD, up to 5 measurement time points, E 2b.)259
2.10.2. Effect of MPH on the Default Mode Network (DMN)
The increased, purely intrinsically motivated control of attention in ADHD means that, when interest is sufficiently high, attention and its controllability are just as high as in individuals without ADHD, and differ from those of individuals without ADHD only when intrinsic interest is lower. This is regulated by the DMN.
Stimulants can bring the attention control of people with ADHD in line with that of people without ADHD when there is a lack of intrinsic interest. (Case-control study comparing participants with and without MPH, N = 36, n = 18, E 2b)260 This explains why stimulants are just as helpful for ADHD-HI and ADHD-C as they are for ADHD-I.
For more information on the altered functioning of the DMN in ADHD and its normalization through stimulants, including additional references, visit ⇒ Normalization of the DMN through stimulants In the article ⇒ Brain Networks and Connectivity in ADHD in the chapter at ⇒ Neurological Aspects.
After 4 months of treatment, the strength of connectivity between the DMN and the whole brain was persistently increased in adults with ADHD treated with MPH (but not with placebo) (p = 0.03); this was not the case in children. (Preprint, secondary analysis of an RCT, n = 99, 4 months, E 1b.)248
Scientific: Individual findings on connectivity and synchronization of the DMN under MPH
(E 1b): MPH altered the connectivity and synchronization of the DMN
- According to a systematic review, 11 out of 12 studies showed an improvement in DMN regions (ADHD and other neuropsychiatric disorders) (Systematic review, k = 12, E 2b.)261
- for ADHD:
- Children (6 months): Increased connectivity between the left putamen and the DMN (p < 0.001), correlated with symptom reduction (rho = −0.65, p = 0.017), no significant change in connectivity within the DMN (open-label before-and-after study, n = 23, 6 months, E 2b.)262
- Children (1 month): In the absence of medication, there is a lack of anti-phase synchronization between the DMN and the task-positive network (TPN); posterior DMN activity correlates with reaction time variability. MPH initiated partial anti-phase synchronization, reduced variability, and eliminated its correlation with the DMN. (Case-control study with before-and-after comparison, N = 22, n = 11, 1 month, E 2b.)263
- Adult males (MPH-IR, mean 0.37 mg/kg/day): stronger connectivity between the posterior cingulate cortex and the left lateral parietal cortex (Open-label before-and-after study, n = 18, E 2b.)264
- In healthy individuals (single dose of 20 mg): overall reduced DMN connectivity (particularly with the auditory, cingulo-opercular, and somatomotor networks) and increased connectivity with the parietomedial network. The DMN was divided into two subnetworks with opposing effects of MPH. Reduced connectivity of the DMN subnetwork with the cingulo-opercular network was associated with higher impulsivity. (RCT, crossover, n = 55, single dose, E 1b.)265
2.10.3. Effects of MPH on the Nucleus Accumbens and Cognitive Control Networks
Methylphenidate increased spontaneous neuronal activity in the nucleus accumbens and in cognitive control networks in children with ADHD. This resulted in more stable, sustained attention. (RCT, crossover, n = 27, with replication cohort, E 1b)266
Scientific: Connectivity of the nucleus accumbens in healthy individuals under the influence of MPH
In healthy individuals, a single dose of MPH (40 mg) reduced resting-state functional connectivity between the nucleus accumbens and the basal ganglia (subthalamic nucleus, ventral pallidum) as well as between the nucleus accumbens and the medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) and temporal cortex. Connectivity between the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus and the limbic circuit remained unchanged. (RCT, crossover, n = 20, single dose, E 1b.)267
After 3 months of OROS-MPH treatment, the reduced activation of the nucleus accumbens and thalamus—which prior to treatment had been diminished only in response to small monetary rewards—normalized to control levels in children and adolescents with ADHD. This change was accompanied by an improvement in ADHD symptoms. (Pre-post fMRI study with a control group, N = 34, n = 17, 3 months, E 2b.)268
2.11. Effect of MPH on the EEG
Implications for People with ADHD
An EEG (electroencephalogram) measures the brain’s electrical activity using electrodes placed on the scalp. Event-related potentials (ERPs) are brief spikes in the EEG that occur in response to a stimulus. The so-called P3 (also P300) occurs approximately 250 to 400 milliseconds after a stimulus.
The most commonly reported EEG finding associated with MPH is an increase in P3 amplitude. Two systematic reviews and a meta-analysis found this, though not in all individual studies. In one study, the larger P3 was associated with more consistent reaction times. In contrast, early stages of stimulus processing, motor planning, and error monitoring showed barely any change under MPH. One small study found a faster P300 after 8 weeks of treatment and interpreted this as a possible indication of a good response. In contrast, a difference from controls in a late ERP component was observed regardless of MPH.
Brain waves in certain frequency ranges (theta, alpha, beta) also changed under the influence of MPH. The findings varied depending on the task, age, and study, and were sometimes contradictory. In one study, the ratio of theta to beta waves—a measure frequently examined in ADHD—did not change despite an improvement in symptoms. In another study, children who responded well to MPH differed on EEG from those who did not respond. In yet another study, the EEG effect of a single dose of MPH depended on the expression of a gene for the dopamine transporter.
MPH thus measurably alters how the brain processes stimuli. It is not yet clear whether EEG readings are suitable for predicting or verifying a response to MPH in individual cases.
MPH caused * In people with ADHD (double-blind, randomized crossover study, N = 37, n = 19, E 1b.)*269
- Significant differences compared to placebo in the frontoparietal region at 250 to 400 ms after the stimulus (P3)
- a significant reduction in reaction time variability, which correlated with increased P3 ERP activity at the frontoparietal electrodes
Regardless of MPH, people with ADHD showed a reduction in the late ERP component (LC, 650 to 800 ms) at frontal electrodes compared to controls. (Double-blind, randomized crossover study, N = 37, n = 19, E 1b.)269
Scientific: EKP components and EEG frequency bands under MPH
(E 1b): MPH increased the P3 amplitude in ADHD. In contrast, early sensory ECP components, motor planning potentials, and error monitoring potentials showed barely any change. (Systematic review, k = 44, E 2b.)270 * (Systematic review, k = 43, E 2b.)*271 The P3 amplitude under MPH was found to
- According to review articles:
- Pre-/post-MPH (k = 17): increased central and posterior activity; greatest effect observed in Go/No-Go tasks (meta-analysis, k = 17; full text not available to us; E 2b.)272
- No overall difference between people with ADHD who have been treated with MPH and controls (k = 13), but a difference in the frontal lobe (meta-analysis, k = 13, full text not available to us, E 2b.)272
- In 11 of 20 P3 studies, * Was increased (systematic review, k = 44, E 2b.)*270
- tends to normalize, accompanied by behavioral improvement (Systematic review, k = 43, E 2b.)271
- in individual studies involving MPH responders:
- greater with MPH than with placebo and not different from controls (auditory oddball task); earlier EEG components (mismatch negativity, N100, N200, P200) remained unchanged (RCT, crossover, N = 28, n = 14, E 1b.)273
- only the early central No-Go-P3 subcomponent (mean latency 378 ms) was amplified, but not the late centrofrontal subcomponent (428 ms) (within-subject study on/off MPH, n = 57, single dose, E 2b.)274
(E 1b): Spectral EEG and other EEG measures changed under the influence of MPH or D-MPH in patients with ADHD for:
- Theta Power:
- reduced during rest (eyes open) compared to physical activity as the control condition (ηp² = 0.12), comparable to neurofeedback (ηp² = 0.08) (RCT, N = 112, n = 81 in the EEG analysis, of whom 25 received MPH, 10 weeks, E 1b.)275
- reduced during a task compared to physical activity (ηp² = 0.10), unlike during neurofeedback (RCT, N = 112, n = 81 in the EEG analysis, of whom 25 received MPH, 10 weeks, E 1b.)275
- Absence of task-related theta increases in the frontal and parietal regions in adults normalized (rest-to-task pattern) (case-control study with open-label MPH treatment, N = 89, n = 21 on MPH, E 2b.)276
- D-MPH: Increased midoccipital theta during retrieval in a spatial working memory task (RCT, n = 172, 8 weeks, E 1b.)277
- Alpha-Power:
- reduced during a task compared to physical activity (ηp² = 0.12) (RCT, N = 112, n = 81 in the EEG analysis, of whom 25 received MPH, 10 weeks, E 1b.)275
- the reactivity of high alpha activity (11 to 12 Hz) from rest to focused attention, which is present in control subjects and untreated children with ADHD, is eliminated (case-control study comparing subjects with and without MPH, N = 37, n = 19, Table 3.)278
- Beta power: D-MPH increased centro-parietal beta power (13 to 21 Hz) at rest (guanfacine reduced alpha power; the combination reduced theta power) (RCT, n = 179, 8 weeks, E 1b.)279
- Very low frequencies (VLF-EEG, 0.02 to 0.2 Hz): In adults, increased frontal and parietal VLF activity reduced omission errors to the level of controls and decreased inattention (longitudinal case-control study, N = 88, n = 21 with MPH, mean 9.4 months, E 2b.)280
- lateralized action potential (LRP): reduced differences compared to controls (case-control study comparing groups with and without MPH, N = 33, n = 17, E 3.)281
After 8 weeks of treatment with 18 mg/day of sustained-release MPH, the NoGo P300 latency at Fz, Cz, and Pz was shortened compared to baseline in boys with ADHD (mean age 8.6 years) (p < 0.05). The authors interpreted the normalization of the P300 latency as a possible neural marker of a good response. (Open-label pre-post study, n = 26, 8 weeks, E 2b.)282
Scientific: EEG spectrum, coherence, and DAT1 genotype under the influence of stimulants
(E 2b): Stimulants altered the EEG in children with ADHD by:
- Increased alpha activity in the central and parietal regions at rest and during cognitive activation; increased frontal beta activity in responders and decreased beta activity in nonresponders (MPH, ages 8 to 12) (Double-blind, placebo-controlled study, n = 36, E 2b.)283
- Increase in intrahemispheric coherence over short- to medium-range electrode distances (significant in the delta band, within the normal range) without normalization of lateralization abnormalities (MPH or dexamfetamine, 6 months, girls with a good response) (Longitudinal study with a control group, N = 40, n = 20, 6 months, E 2b.)284
- Unchanged theta/beta ratio despite improvement in symptoms (MPH, approximately 8 weeks) (Case-control study, N = 63, n = 32, approximately 8 weeks, author(s) employed by pharmaceutical companies, full text not available to us, E 3.)285
The EEG effects of a single dose of MPH (10 mg) in children with ADHD depended on the DAT1 genotype. Children with the 10R/10R genotype showed more central and parietal beta activity, less right frontal theta activity, and a lower theta/beta ratio while on MPH; carriers of the 9R allele showed the opposite pattern. (Double-blind, placebo-controlled single-dose study, n = 27, Phase 2b.)286
2.12. Effects on Brain Regions
Implications for People with ADHD
Imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) show the regions of the brain where MPH exerts its effects. According to these studies, MPH acts primarily in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), the front part of the brain, and in the striatum, a part of the basal ganglia deep within the brain.
In ADHD, gray matter volume is reduced in certain brain regions, such as the basal ganglia. Meta-analyses found this reduction to be less pronounced in treated individuals. In one study, 16 weeks of MPH treatment reduced the decrease in cortical thickness in a specific brain region among boys, but not among men.
In numerous studies, MPH functionally increased activation in the prefrontal cortex, particularly in the right inferior prefrontal cortex, and especially during tasks that required response inhibition. In many cases, this activation approached the levels seen in individuals without ADHD. A systematic review concluded that MPH is likely to reduce dysfunction in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in most people with ADHD. Stimulants and non-stimulants, such as atomoxetine, acted partly through common brain regions and partly through different ones.
The effect also depended on age and duration of treatment. A single dose of MPH reduced the response of the amygdala—a brain region involved in processing emotions—to angry and fearful faces. After 16 weeks of treatment, this effect was no longer detectable. A single dose altered glucose metabolism in several brain regions; after several weeks of treatment, changes were found in only a few regions. Long-term stimulant treatment showed no lasting age-related changes in the blood flow response to MPH after 4 years.
Animal studies in rats showed that MPH exerted its effects in the PFC and the caudate nucleus. The same dose led to an enhanced behavioral response in some animals and a diminished response in others. In monkeys, MPH improved task performance without causing any measurable changes in the activity of neurons in the examined frontal lobe region.
Overall, the findings suggest that MPH may reduce abnormalities in the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia in ADHD. However, many of the individual studies were small.
Neuroimaging studies show numerous effects of MPH on various regions of the brain. These studies indicate that MPH acts primarily in the PFC and striatum. MPH
- appears to reduce the loss of gray matter typical of ADHD
- in the basal ganglia (primarily in children; the problem tends to diminish on its own in adults)
- in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in adults (METASTUDY, E 3.)288
- In rats, the dopaminergic system of the caudate nucleus was required for the acute and chronic behavioral effects of MPH, while the glutamatergic system was required for the chronic effects (behavioral sensitization). (Animal study, N = 40, rats, E 2b.)289
- In boys with ADHD who were objectively hyperactive, daily administration of methylphenidate for one week increased the previously reduced blood flow to the putamen (measured indirectly via the T2 relaxation time). In boys with ADHD without increased motor activity, it resulted in a reduction in blood flow to the putamen. The thalamus was not affected by MPH. (Triple-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study, N = 17, n = 11, 1 week each, E 1b.)290
MPH increased activation in the bilateral inferior frontal cortex/insula during inhibition and during temporal discrimination. In a meta-analysis, stimulants (including MPH alone) most consistently increased activation in the right inferior frontal cortex/insula. (Systematic review and meta-analysis, k = 14, n = 212, as well as RCT, n = 20, E 1b.)291 - A single dose of methylphenidate (0.35 mg/kg) increased glucose metabolism in the left posterior frontal and left parietal regions of the brain in adults with ADHD and decreased it in the left anterior medial frontal region, in the left parietal and left parieto-occipital regions, without altering global metabolism. (Open-label before-and-after study, N = 27, n = 14, single dose, E 2b.)292 After at least 6 weeks of treatment, methylphenidate altered glucose metabolism in only 2 of 60 brain regions and not globally. (Open-label before-and-after study, N = 37, n = 19, at least 6 weeks, E 2b.)293
- MPH caused * In healthy adults (single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study, N = 37, E 1b.)*294
- longer and more frequent brain states characterized by predominantly frontoparietal activation
- longer and more frequent states of the brain characterized by visual suppression
- shorter and less frequent brain states dominated by somatomotor activation
MPH appears to reduce PFC dysfunction in most people with ADHD. (Qualitative review, k = 29, E 3)295 The RCT included in a meta-analysis found no effect of MPH on working memory networks. (Systematic review and meta-analysis, k = 14, n = 212, as well as RCT, n = 20, E 1b.)291
Scientific: Neural Responses in the Prefrontal Cortex and Caudate Nucleus in Rats
A study in rats using single and repeated doses of 0, 0.6, 2.5, and 10.0 mg MPH/kg found that MPH affected the PFC and the caudate nucleus. The same dose of MPH induced behavioral sensitization in some animals and tolerance in others, with activity in the PFC and caudate nucleus correlating with the animals’ behavioral responses to MPH. A larger proportion of neurons in the caudate nucleus than in the PFC responded to MPH, both following single and repeated administration. In addition, dose-dependent differences in responses were observed between the PFC and the caudate nucleus: Some PFC and caudate nucleus cell units responded to the same dose of MPH with an increase in neuronal firing rate, while others responded with a decrease. (Animal study, rats, E 2b.)296
Long-term stimulant treatment showed no age-dependent lasting effects on the cerebral blood flow (rCBF) response to MPH in the 4-year follow-up, suggesting that earlier short-term effects were apparently transient. The rCBF response in the medial PFC was age-dependent and associated with stimulant use, even before treatment began. Only in adolescents did the rCBF response correlate with D1 receptor distribution. (4-year follow-up of an RCT (ePOD), n = 56, male, pharmacological MRI, full text not available to us, E 1b.)297 For long-term effects, see 2.1.1.10.
Scientific: Findings on activation from systematic reviews, individual studies, and animal studies
(E 1b): MPH altered the activation of brain regions
- based on reviews by:
- Children with ADHD (single dose): Increased activation in the middle and inferior frontal gyri (especially during inhibition tasks), in the basal ganglia, and in the cerebellum, usually with at least some areas returning to levels seen in healthy individuals (Systematic review, k = 9, E 2b.)298
- ADHD (stimulants and non-stimulants combined): Increased activation in the left supplementary motor area (Z = 1.21, p < 0.0001, central executive network) (Meta-analysis, k = 28, N = 855, n = 396 on medication, E 2b.)299
- ADHD (stimulants vs. non-stimulants): greater activation in the left amygdala (Z = 1.30, p = 0.0006), superior frontal gyrus (Z = 1.27, p = 0.0006), and middle cingulate gyrus (Z = 1.22, p = 0.0008), regions of the ventral attentional network (meta-analysis, k = 28, N = 855, n = 396 on medication, E 2b.)299
- ADHD (long-term stimulant use): more normal activation of the right caudate nucleus during attention tasks (meta-regression, preliminary) (meta-analysis, k = 21 and 13 datasets, E 3.)300
- in individual studies on ADHD (single dose) for:
- Interference inhibition (Simon task, medication-naive boys): Increased activation in the right inferior prefrontal and premotor cortices; underactivation in the right inferior PFC and striato-thalamic region normalized; medial frontal and temporal dysfunction unaffected (RCT, crossover, with healthy control group, N = 25, n = 12, single dose, E 1b.)301
- Sustained attention (adolescents): fronto-parietal and striato-thalamic underactivation normalized (as well as with atomoxetine); only MPH improved performance. MPH-specific increased activation in the left ventrolateral PFC and superior temporal cortex. (RCT, crossover, with healthy control group, N = 41, n = 14, single dose, E 1b.)302
- Go/No-Go task (fNIRS, children aged 6 to 13): reduced activation in the right inferior and middle frontal gyri normalized; not observed with the placebo * E (RCT, crossover, with a healthy control group, N = 32, n = 16, single dose, E 1b.)*303
- Processing of angry and fearful faces (0.5 mg/kg): Reduced reactivity of the right amygdala in children and adults; reduced reactivity of the left amygdala only in adults (pre-treatment: children −31%, adults +31% compared to controls) (Pharmacological fMRI with an open-label single dose and a control group, N = 104, n = 81, Phase 2b.)304
- in individual studies on ADHD (long-term treatment) for:
- Go/No-Go task (6 to 8 weeks, comparison with atomoxetine): comparable improvement in symptoms (MPH 55%, atomoxetine 57%), along with reduced activation of the bilateral motor cortex. Under MPH, the improvement was accompanied by reduced activation, while under atomoxetine, it was accompanied by increased activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus, left ACC/supplementary motor area, and bilateral posterior cingulate cortex. (fMRI before-and-after study, parallel groups, N = 36, n = 18, 6 to 8 weeks, partially manufacturer-funded, E 2b.)305
- Go/No-Go task (fNIRS, children, 6 months): Increased oxygenated hemoglobin in the right medial PFC, improved Go/No-Go accuracy and SNAP-IV scores (Before-and-after study with a healthy control group, N = 48, n = 36, 6 months, E 2b.)306
- emotional face processing (16 weeks, boys aged 10 to 12 and men): no effect on amygdala reactivity, amygdala connectivity, or internalizing symptoms, unlike after acute administration. ADHD symptoms improved. (RCT, n = 99, 16 weeks, E 1b.)307
- Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the ACC (adults, 5 to 6 weeks): Choline-containing compounds decreased, N-acetylaspartate increased, creatine unchanged, with marked clinical improvement (Open-label before-and-after study, n = 7, 5 to 6 weeks, E 2b.)308
- In healthy individuals (single dose) for:
- Rewarded conflict task: higher accuracy with lower activity in the attention and reward systems (particularly the insula during reward trials), interpreted as an increase in efficiency (RCT, crossover, n = 16, single dose, E 1b.)309
- Rewarded working memory task (30 mg MPH, 60 mg atomoxetine): In unrewarded trials, only MPH was distinguishable from placebo, showing a reward-like activation pattern during encoding. During the retention period of rewarded trials, MPH increased the activity of working memory networks to a greater extent, while atomoxetine increased that of the DMN to a greater extent. (placebo-controlled crossover study, n = 15, single dose, E 1b.)310
- In macaques: improved task performance at certain doses without changes in single-neuron activity, noise correlations, or ensemble activity in the caudal lateral PFC (2,811 neuronal recordings) (animal study, macaques, n = 2, 55 sessions, E 2b.)311
16 weeks of MPH reduced the decrease in cortical thickness in the right medial cortex in boys (ages 10 to 12), but not in men (ages 23 to 40) or in the placebo group (interaction: time × medication × age, F = 4.316, p < 0.05). (RCT, n = 99, 16 weeks, E 1b.)312
2.13. MPH in Preschoolers
Implications for People with ADHD
Several meta-analyses and controlled studies found that MPH and other stimulants reduced symptoms and improved overall functioning in preschool-aged children with ADHD. The effects were moderate, and in some cases, large. The effect was stronger for hyperactivity and impulsivity than for inattention and was more pronounced in boys, older children, and with longer-term treatment. However, the quality of the evidence was rated as low to very low.
In a meta-analysis, the only side effect that occurred more frequently than with placebo was decreased appetite. Preschoolers on MPH were less likely to discontinue treatment than those on placebo. This was not observed with amphetamine medications. In a small study, behavior improved significantly in over 82% of preschoolers receiving the optimal dose, and side effects were rare.
In a study, preschoolers cleared MPH from their bodies more slowly than school-age children. At the same dose per kilogram of body weight, they reached higher peak blood levels and thus experienced greater exposure to the active ingredient.
The effect also depended on how many other mental health disorders (comorbidities) a child had. In one study, children with no additional disorders or just one additional disorder responded well, while children with three or more additional disorders did not respond. Children with more comorbidities also experienced greater family stress.
Some studies show that MPH has a positive effect on preschool-aged children with ADHD. (Review, author(s) employed by the manufacturer, E 4)313
(E 1a): MPH and other stimulants reduced symptoms and improved functional levels in preschool children with ADHD for:
- Global functional level (CGAS, 3 to 5 years, IR-MPH up to 1.25 mg/kg/day) Effect size 0.80 (0.32 to 1.28) (RCT, double-blind, placebo- and sham-controlled, N = 153, n = 51 per arm, 8 weeks, E 1b.)314
- Severity (CGI-S, 3 to 5 years) Effect size −0.70 (−1.16 to −0.24) (RCT, double-blind, placebo- and sham-controlled, N = 153, n = 51 per arm, 8 weeks, E 1b.)314
- Overall symptoms as assessed by teachers (k = 9, up to 6 years of age) Hedges’ g 0.66 (0.21 to 1.10) (meta-analysis, k = 9 RCTs, N = 544, E 1a.)315
- Overall symptoms as assessed by parents (k = 9, up to 6 years of age) Hedges’ g 0.62 (0.32 to 0.91) (meta-analysis, k = 9 RCTs, N = 544, E 1a.)315
- Severity of ADHD symptoms (k = 5, of which 4 used MPH, up to 7 years) SMD −0.59 (−0.77 to −0.41), with no heterogeneity (meta-analysis, k = 5 RCTs, N = 489, E 1a.)316
- SNAP-IV Parents/Teachers (ages 3 to 5) Effect size −0.55 (−0.99 to −0.10) (RCT, double-blind, placebo- and sham-controlled, N = 153, n = 51 per arm, 8 weeks, E 1b.)314
Stimulants had a stronger effect on hyperactivity/impulsivity than on inattention in preschool-aged children and were more effective in boys, older children, and with longer treatment durations. Among the side effects, only decreased appetite was more common than with placebo (OR 2.39). The quality of evidence was low to very low. (meta-analysis, k = 9 RCTs, N = 544, E 1a.)315 Preschool children discontinued treatment less frequently with MPH than with placebo (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.54), but not with amphetamine medications (OR 1.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 4.46). (meta-analysis, k = 5 RCTs, N = 489, E 1a.)316
Preschoolers (ages 4 to 5) had a significantly higher dose-normalized peak concentration (Cmax, p = 0.003) and a significantly slower clearance (p = 0.0002) than school-aged children (6 to 8 years), resulting in higher exposure. (Comparative pharmacokinetic study, N = 23, n = 14, single dose, author(s) employed by the manufacturer, E 2b.)317
Among preschool children (ages 4 to 5.9 years), more than 82% showed an improvement of at least one standard deviation in their behavioral assessments by parents and teachers when treated with the optimal dose of MPH or mixed amphetamine salts, and more than 50% showed an improvement of more than two standard deviations. Side effects were rare at the optimal dose. (placebo-controlled crossover study, n = 28, E 2a.)318
The effect of MPH in preschool children (ages 3 to 5.5 years) depended on the number of comorbid disorders. The effect size for 7.5 mg compared to placebo was: (moderator analysis of an RCT (PATS), N = 165, 5 weeks, E 2b.)319
- 1 comorbid disorder d = 1.00
- no comorbid disorder: d = 0.89
- 2 comorbid disorders, d = 0.56
- 3 or more comorbid disorders: d = -0.37 (no response)
Children with more comorbidities experienced greater family stress. See also ⇒ 5.7.
2.14. MPH Normalizes Pain Sensitivity in ADHD
Implications for People with ADHD
In a study, adults with ADHD were more sensitive to cold pain than people without ADHD. They felt the pain sooner and could tolerate it for a shorter time. A single dose of MPH partially reduced this increased sensitivity, but not completely. In a study, children with ADHD also had lower pain thresholds to pressure. Among children not taking MPH, the thresholds were lowered in more body regions than among children who had been taking MPH for at least 3 months.
According to parents, untreated children with ADHD in another study perceived pain less intensely than healthy children. The findings regarding pain sensitivity in ADHD are therefore contradictory. In both cases, MPH brought the values in line with those of healthy children.
In healthy men without ADHD, MPH also increased the threshold and tolerance for cold pain, but not for unpleasant loud noises. This suggests that MPH has a specific effect on pain processing.
Adults with ADHD showed increased sensitivity to cold pain (pain threshold of 2.8 seconds compared to 5.8 seconds, pain tolerance of 21.8 seconds compared to 62.8 seconds in controls). A single dose of MPH partially reduced these effects (pain threshold 3.6 seconds, pain tolerance 46.4 seconds). (case-control study with open-label single-dose administration, N = 60, n = 30, E 2b.)320
In healthy men, a single dose of MPH (20 mg)—but not a placebo—increased the cold pain threshold (from 4.1 to 5.4 seconds, p = 0.001) and cold pain tolerance (from 57.8 to 73.8 seconds, p = 0.001). MPH had no effect on the threshold or tolerance to loud, aversive auditory stimuli, suggesting a specific antinociceptive effect. (RCT, crossover, n = 40, single dose, manufacturer-funded, E 1b.)321
Children with ADHD (ages 8 to 13) had lower pressure pain thresholds than controls. Without MPH, thresholds were reduced in more body regions than in children who had received at least 3 months of MPH treatment. (Case-control study, N = 123, n = 82, E 3.)322
According to parental reports, however, children and adolescents with ADHD who were not taking medication had a lower perception of pain than healthy children and than children with ADHD treated with MPH. (Cross-sectional study (KiGGS), N = 260, n = 65 per ADHD group, E 3.)323
2.15. MPH Improves Inflammation Markers
Implications for People with ADHD
ADHD is associated with increased inflammatory processes in the brain (neuroinflammation). It is not yet clear whether MPH improves inflammatory markers. One study found improved inflammatory markers in the blood after 12 weeks of MPH treatment. Another study found no significant change in the inflammatory mediators (cytokines)—which are elevated in ADHD—after approximately 4 months of MPH treatment. After at least 12 months of stimulant treatment, another inflammatory marker did not differ from that of untreated children.
Laboratory studies on cells and animals yielded mixed results. In mouse immune cells, MPH reduced the release of pro-inflammatory signaling molecules. In astrocytes—a type of supportive cell in the brain—and in the brains of rats, however, MPH promoted signs of inflammation. A review of animal studies found that MPH can trigger inflammatory processes in the brain, depending on age, duration of treatment, route of administration, and dose. Young animals were more susceptible.
ADHD is associated with increased neuroinflammation.
Treatment with MPH improved inflammatory markers. (Prospective cohort study, N = 166, n = 114, 12 weeks, Phase 2b)324
Among MPH and stimulants, the following were found in inflammatory markers
- for children and adolescents with ADHD:
- After approximately 4 months of MPH treatment, no significant change in the cytokine profile elevated in ADHD (IL-1β, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-13); TNF-α and S100B were not different from controls (Prospective case-control study with a before-after comparison, N = 81, n = 40, approximately 4 months, E 2b.)200
- After at least 12 months of stimulant use, no difference in serum GDF-15 levels compared with untreated individuals (age-adjusted) (cross-sectional study, N = 72, n = 32, E 3.)325
- in vitro and in animal models:
- In macrophages (mouse, 1 to 10 µg/mL), dose-dependent reduction in the release of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-12p40 (p < 0.001), and of GM-CSF at higher doses, upon modulation of the PI3K signaling pathway (in vitro study, J774.2 mouse macrophage cell line, E 2b.)326
- Increased TNF release in astrocytes, astrogliosis, and oxidative/nitrosative stress, concordant in the hippocampus of WKY rats (1.5 mg/kg/day, chronic); no significant effect on microglia (in vitro and animal study, N9 microglia cell line, astrocytes, rats (WKY); full text not available to us; E 2b.)226
Scientific: Animal studies on inflammation, redox homeostasis, and apoptosis
A review of animal studies found that MPH can trigger inflammatory processes in the brain and alter the apoptosis pathway, depending on age, duration of treatment, route of administration, and dose, with young animals being more susceptible. (Narrative review of animal studies; full text not available to us; E 4.)231
2.16. Serdex methylphenidate improved sleep in children with ADHD
Implications for People with ADHD
A manufacturer-funded open-label study found improvements in 5 out of 8 sleep parameters in children with ADHD aged 6 to 12 who were treated with Serdex methylphenidate or Dex methylphenidate for 12 months. However, the time it took to fall asleep increased.
Several studies of MPH in children and adults also found no deterioration in sleep—and in some cases, even improvements. In one study of children, total sleep time increased after 6 months, and periodic leg movements during sleep decreased. In adults, several small studies showed improvements in sleep efficiency or perceived sleep quality, with the greatest improvements observed in those who had previously experienced particularly poor sleep.
In contrast, a study of children found that, as the dose increased, parents reported more sleep problems. However, children with pre-existing sleep problems were less likely to experience sleep problems at the highest dose. The effect of MPH on sleep was therefore inconsistent and depended, among other factors, on the dose and the initial situation.
A study reports a significant improvement in sleep among children with ADHD between the ages of 6 and 12 who were treated with serdex methylphenidate or dex methylphenidate. Five out of eight sleep parameters showed significant improvement, while sleep latency worsened significantly. (Open-label study, N = 282, n = 238, 12 months, manufacturer-funded, Phase 2b.)327
2.16.1. Effects of MPH on Sleep
Under MPH, the following was observed regarding sleep in people with ADHD
- for children:
- After 6 months (0.3 to 0.7 mg/kg per dose), polysomnographic findings showed an increase in total sleep time and a decrease in the periodic limb movement index; according to parental reports, there was a reduction in bruxism and snoring (inattentive subtype), fewer nightmares (mixed/hyperactive subtype), and fewer periodic limb movements, without any worsening of sleep problems (Prospective controlled study, N = 101, n = 71, 6 months, E 2b.)328
- No difference in sleep efficiency compared with placebo as measured by actigraphy in week 8 (p = 0.94), Improved sleep efficiency 1 week after the end of treatment (p = 0.005; not observed with placebo) (RCT, n = 50, 16 weeks, E 1b.)329
- Dose-dependent increases in parent-reported sleep problems (placebo 8%, low dose 18%, medium dose 15%, high dose 25%). Among children with pre-existing sleep problems (n = 16), only 37.5% still had sleep problems at the highest dose. (RCT, N = 163, 4 weeks, E 1b.)330
- in adults:
- increased sleep efficiency as measured by polysomnography and subjectively improved restorative sleep (average 36.7 mg/day, for at least 26 days), with, prior to treatment, more nocturnal activity, lower sleep efficiency, more awakenings, and less REM sleep compared to controls (case-control study with open-label treatment, N = 68, n = 10 on MPH, E 2b.)331
- a significant improvement in subjective sleep quality, most pronounced among participants with the poorest baseline sleep (Prospective, non-randomized, open-label study, 6 weeks, full text not available to us, E 2b.)332
- An increased proportion of stage 2 sleep as measured by polysomnography (from 46.6% to 55.2%, p = 0.011); otherwise, no changes (MPH-IR, Ø 43 mg/day) (Open-label pilot study, n = 9, 6 weeks, Phase 2b.)333
2.17. More about MPH
Implications for People with ADHD
Methylphenidates (MPH) act, among other things, on dopamine transporters. These transporters reabsorb the neurotransmitter dopamine into the sending nerve cell after signal transmission. In ADHD, they are considered to be overactive, which can disrupt signal transmission between nerve cells. MPH slows down the transporters. In one study, MPH reduced neural noise in people with ADHD to the level seen in people without the condition. Since the number of dopamine transporters decreases with age, adults require significantly lower doses.
It remains unclear whether very early treatment with stimulants can lead to a lasting improvement in ADHD. Most of the evidence comes from animal studies on rats without ADHD characteristics, and its relevance to ADHD is considered very limited. In a study of adolescents with ADHD, treatment with stimulants was associated with a slower rate of cortical thinning. In another study, a higher total dose of MPH before age 12 correlated with greater gray matter volume in frontal brain regions.
In a very small study using functional imaging, MPH increased activation of the striatum (a region deep within the brain) only in people with ADHD; in people without ADHD, it decreased it. It remains unclear how much MPH actually reaches the neural connections.
It is unclear whether MPH affects the hormone prolactin. In men, prolactin levels remained unchanged, while in children they increased. In some studies, MPH increased the growth hormone response to physical exertion in children and, after 2 months, increased the appetite hormones ghrelin and adiponectin. Findings regarding the growth factor BDNF were inconsistent. One meta-analysis found no change, while individual studies reported a decrease. In one study, MPH improved comorbid depression in children with ADHD. In healthy college students, the effect of MPH on learning through reward and punishment depended on working memory capacity.
2.17.1. Effect on dopamine transporters
MPH acts (among other things) on the dopamine transporters in the brain. Since the number of dopamine transporters decreases with age (halving in 50-year-olds compared to 10-year-olds), adults require significantly lower doses.
Details on the Resumption Inhibition
Cranial nerves transmit information electrically. At the point where one nerve connects to another (synapse), the signal is transmitted across the synaptic cleft to another cranial nerve. This transmission of information typically occurs chemically via neurotransmitters (dopamine, norepinephrine, serotonin, and others). The electrical signal triggers the release of neurotransmitters (in this case, dopamine) into the synaptic cleft at the end of the nerve (presynaptic). At the receiving nerve on the other side of the synaptic cleft (postsynaptic), the neurotransmitter (in this case, dopamine) is taken up by (dopamine) receptors and, once a threshold number of activated receptors is reached, triggers the transmission of an (electrical) signal. The neurotransmitter is then released back into the synaptic cleft by the receiving neuron, from where the sending neuron reabsorbs it via specialized reuptake transporters (in the case of dopamine, the dopamine reuptake transporter, DAT) to be stored back into the vesicles for the next signal transmission.
In ADHD, the DAT reuptake transporters (located primarily in the striatum) are overactive. When dopamine is released from the presynaptic neuron into the synaptic cleft, the DATs of the presynaptic neuron reabsorb the dopamine before it can be taken up by the postsynaptic receptors of the target neuron. The signaling pathway is thus disrupted; in terms of dopamine, this is comparable to static in a radio signal (“neural noise”). (Case-control study, n = 61, E 3)334 Stimulants such as methylphenidate inhibit DAT activity, allowing dopamine to remain in the synaptic cleft long enough for the signal to be transmitted clearly. Thus, MPH reduced neural noise in people with ADHD to the level seen in people without the condition. (case-control study, n = 61, E 3)334
What is unique about dopaminergic synapses is that, according to the latest findings (2019), there are no dopamine receptors at all on the receiving end of the dopaminergic synapse—instead, there are GABA receptors. Rather, the dopamine receptors are spatially arranged around the synapse and respond to dopamine that diffuses out of the synapse or is released in some other way.
2.17.2. Early Use of Stimulants and Long-Term Effects
Implications for People with ADHD
Some speculate that very early treatment with stimulants could permanently improve the overactivity of dopamine transporters even after the medication is discontinued. Whether this works remains to be seen. Since stress-regulation systems develop during the first years of life, such treatment would likely have to begin very early.
Most of the findings come from animal studies, primarily involving rats without ADHD characteristics. The results were inconsistent. In some studies, after receiving MPH injections during adolescence, these animals exhibited increased anxiety, depression-like behavior, reduced motivation, and greater sensitivity to stress as adults. In contrast, oral administration did not increase anxiety, and no lasting cognitive impairments occurred. Other studies found reduced impulsivity and more favorable decision-making. In rats with ADHD-like traits, early administration of MPH or caffeine improved object recognition in adulthood, whereas in rats without ADHD-like traits, it impaired it. When medications are given to animals without the deficit they are intended to compensate for, negative effects are to be expected. Studies using ADHD animal models would therefore be more meaningful.
In a study, adolescents with ADHD experienced significantly slower cortical thinning while taking stimulants than when not taking medication. In another study, a higher total dose of MPH administered before age 12 was associated with more gray matter in frontal brain regions and a greater improvement in oppositional symptoms, whereas administration starting at age 12 was not. For young children, parent-centered behavioral therapy provides significant benefits, whereas child-centered therapy offers barely any.
Some researchers have suggested that early treatment with stimulants could permanently improve the elevated DAT density associated with ADHD (i.e., beyond the duration of treatment). This claim is based on findings in rats, in which MPH caused a sustained reduction in DAT before, but not after, puberty. (Textbook, E 4.)335
Early Medication to Cure ADHD?
Early-life stress, when combined with a corresponding genetic predisposition, leads to long-term damage to stress regulation systems. Such the establishment of a stress response could potentially be prevented through timely pharmacological treatment. In mice exposed to stress, the serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine normalized the risk-assessment behavior (an anxiety-related evaluation of dangers) that had been heightened by chronic mild stress, whereas the GABA-A receptor modulator diazepam did not produce this effect. (Animal study, mice, 5 weeks, E 2b.)336
Chronic administration of caffeine or MPH before puberty resulted in improved object recognition in adult SHR rats (a rat strain that represents a genetic form of ADHD-HI), whereas the same treatment impaired object recognition in adult Wistar rats. (Animal study, rats (SHR, Wistar), 14 days, E 2b)337
(E 2b): Administration of 2 mg/kg MPH via intraperitoneal injection twice daily before puberty (days 20 through 35) into the abdominal cavity of NON-ADHD model rats resulted in the following effects in adulthood (which could be normalized by fluoxetine or the kappa-opioid antagonist nor-binaltorphimine): (Animal study, rats (Sprague-Dawley), 16 days, E 2b.)338 * (Animal study, rats (Sprague-Dawley), 16 days, E 2b.)*339
- increased anxiety
- increased symptoms of depression
- reduced ability to be motivated
- due to drugs (morphine or cocaine place preference)
- lower sucrose preference
In contrast, oral administration to non-ADHD model rats beginning on day 27 for 4 to 7 weeks, 5 days a week,
- Did not increase anxiety (animal study, Wistar rats, 4 or 7 weeks, E 2b)340
- temporarily altered hippocampus-sensitive learning but did not cause any cognitive impairments (animal study, Wistar rats, 7 weeks, E 2b)341
Wistar rats (a non-ADHD model) that received MPH at a therapeutic dose—but administered via injection—for 14 days during adolescence (days 30 through 44) exhibited reduced impulsivity as adult animals. In addition, total creatine and taurine levels were elevated in the dorsal striatum and reduced in the nucleus accumbens. (Animal study, n = 16, rats (Wistar), 14 days, E 2b.)342
(E 2b): One study examined choice preferences between frequent small rewards and infrequent large rewards (nudging a lever to obtain food). Adult rats that had received MPH during adolescence showed a shift in preference that can be interpreted as increased efficiency and/or flexibility, leading to a “better” (i.e., more optimal) decision-making process. (Animal study, rats (Wistar), 16 days, E 2b)343 * (Animal study, n = 16, rats (Wistar), 14 days, E 2b)342 * (Narrative review, E 4)79
Sprague-Dawley rats (a non-ADHD model) that had received intraperitoneal injections of MPH (2 mg/kg) or cocaine during adolescence showed the following results as adults in place conditioning tests: (Animal study, rats (Sprague-Dawley), 16 days, E 2b)344
- an aversive reaction to moderate doses of cocaine
- a reduced rewarding effect of high doses of cocaine
- Early exposure to MPH produces depression-like effects in the forced swim test
- early MPH exposure is associated with reduced habituation to the activity chambers (a sign of greater stress sensitivity)
Sprague-Dawley rats (a non-ADHD model) that had received intraperitoneal injections of MPH (2 mg/kg) twice daily during adolescence (days 20 through 35) exhibited the following as adults: (Animal study, rats (Sprague-Dawley), 16 days, E 2b)345
- lower reward reactance to sucrose, novelty-induced activity, and sex
- significantly more sensitive reactions to stressful situations and elevated plasma levels of corticosterone
- more frequent anxiety-like behavior
In adult rats that received MPH during adolescence, changes in taurine levels were observed that could lead to hyperactivity in the dorsal striatum and the associated hypofunction of the nucleus accumbens. Taurine may influence the extent to which a given brain region is capable of processing neural information and regulating behavior. The taurine level in a brain region could serve as an index of regional reactivity to synaptic input signals and thus of the overall function of that brain region. (Narrative Review, E 4)79
Furthermore, adult rats that received MPH during adolescence showed an increase in the phosphocreatine-to-creatine ratio in the PFC, which could be a consequence of improved energy metabolism. The authors hypothesize that the enhanced function of the PFC is responsible for downregulating the functional activity of the nucleus accumbens and increasing the activity of the dorsal striatum. Studies suggest distinct functional roles for PFC projections to these two target regions. While the circuit from the PFC to the striatum serves attention, which influences executive planning and the selection of actions, the pathway from the PFC to the nucleus accumbens serves to integrate information about the motivational consequences of an action. This could explain how PFC regions modulate subcortical activity. (Narrative Review, E 4)79
While treatment of rats with MPH over 16 days during adolescence resulted in changes in the expression of approximately 700 genes in the striatum at the end of treatment, only 2 genes (Grik2 and Htr7) were found to still have elevated expression in adulthood. (Narrative review, E 4.)79
Slight changes were also observed in the average levels of N-acetyl aspartate and glutamine in the nucleus accumbens, as well as in the total choline content in the dorsal striatum.
N-acetylaspartate (Narrative Review, E 4)346 Aging and neurodegenerative processes reduce N-acetylaspartate levels. (Narrative review, E 4)347 Rats exposed to MPH also showed reduced N-acetylaspartate levels as adults. (Narrative review, E 4)79
To the extent that the tests listed above were conducted using non-ADHD model animals, we believe they have only very limited relevance to the effects of MPH in rats with ADHD. When administering medication to organisms that do not exhibit the deficit the medication is intended to correct, adverse effects of the medication are virtually to be expected.
However, the tests are valuable in that, in theory, stimulants administered early on have the potential to produce a curative effect.
Tests on ADHD animal models would be valuable.
Adolescents who took psychostimulants showed a slower rate of cortical thinning in the right motor strip, the left middle/inferior frontal gyrus, and the right parieto-occipital region, compared to the elevated rates observed in adolescents with ADHD who were not taking medication (0.03 mm/year vs. 0.16 mm/year = less than one-fifth). (cohort study, n = 43, E 2b)348
Administration of MPH before age 12 was associated with morphological changes in the brain, unlike administration starting at age 12. (Longitudinal study, n = 180, 4.9 years, E 2b.)349 An increased cumulative methylphenidate dose before age 12 was associated with:
- increased gray matter volume in several frontal regions
- right:
- paracentral cortex
- caudal medial frontal cortex
- superior frontal cortex
- lateral orbitofrontal cortex
- rostral medial frontal cortex
- precentral cortex
- left:
- Pars opercularis
- paracentral cortex
- superior frontal cortex
- right:
- a greater improvement in symptoms of opposition with a larger increase in volume in:
- right rostral-medial frontal cortex
- right paracentral cortex
- right superior frontal cortex
- left paracentral cortex
Since the neurotransmitter systems responsible for stress regulation develop during the first years of life (presumably by age 6 or earlier), any medication intended to influence these systems would need to be started much earlier. Whether this would be effective remains to be seen. What is certain, however, is that child-centered behavioral therapy barely provides any benefit for young children, whereas parent-centered therapy is highly beneficial. This could indicate that the stress systems in young children can still be repaired through external intervention.
2.17.3. Brain Activity and Drug Concentration in the Brain
Scientific: Alpha-Band Power in the EEG of Rats
Methylphenidate and amphetamine increased the power of the alpha band in rats, while atomoxetine and guanfacine did not. (Animal study, rats; author(s) employed by the manufacturer (of ASP2905); E 2b.)350
A very small fMRI study involving 16 participants that examined the effects of methylphenidate on boys with and without ADHD found that, among people with ADHD who were not taking methylphenidate, compared to people without ADHD, a GoGo/No-Go task, while in another task, it showed reduced activation of the striatum. Methylphenidate altered activation in only one of the two tasks. It increased frontal activation equally in both groups, whereas it increased striatal activation only in people with ADHD, while decreasing it in people without ADHD. (Experimental study with a control group, N = 16, n = 10, E 2b.)351
Scientific: Concentrations of methylphenidate and cocaine in the brain (animal studies)
It is unclear what concentrations of methylphenidate reach the synaptic cleft. (Animal and in vitro study, mice, E 2b)15
In mice, the brain concentration of methylphenidate was 4 to 8 times higher than the plasma concentration 15 to 30 minutes after oral administration of a therapeutically relevant dose (0.75 mg/kg). The authors cited passive diffusion with a saturable transport component as the mechanism. (Animal study, mice, E 2b.)352 For cocaine, concentrations in brain regions of rats following intravenous self-administration were 3.3 to 6.2 times higher than in plasma, with the highest levels in the striatum. (Animal study, N = 26, rats (Wistar), E 2b.)353
2.17.4. Hormones and Other Findings
It is unclear whether MPH affects prolactin levels.
In men, it did not affect serum prolactin levels. (Controlled study, E 2a)354 Nor did it affect levels in unaffected individuals. (Double-blind, randomized crossover study, n = 30, E 1b)355
Neither amphetamine nor methylphenidate reduced serum prolactin levels in rats. Amphetamine, but not methylphenidate, blocked the increase in serum prolactin in response to reserpine. (Animal study, N = 60, rats, E 2b)356
Elevated prolactin levels in children treated with MPH. (double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, n = 14, 12 weeks, Phase 2a)357
In children with ADHD, the responses of growth hormone (p < 0.002) and dopamine (p < 0.01) to physical exertion were lower than in controls. MPH increased the growth hormone response (p < 0.04), though it did not reach the levels seen in the control group. (Controlled study, N = 20, n = 10, single dose, full text not available to us, E 2b.)358
Among those with MPH, appetite hormones were found to
- Orexin A: lower in ADHD patients treated with MPH than in those without MPH (p = 0.032); both groups had lower levels than the control group (Cross-sectional study, N = 283, n = 119 on MPH; full text not available to us; E 3.)359
- Ghrelin:
- Adiponectin: increased after 2 months (Controlled before-and-after study, N = 50, n = 30, 2 months, E 2b.)360
- Leptin:
Peripheral BDNF levels were found to be lower under MPH
- According to a meta-analysis, there was no change, nor was there any difference between the ADHD group and the control group (meta-analysis, k = 19, full text not available to us, E 2b.)361
- reduced after 2 months (Controlled before-and-after study, N = 50, n = 30, 2 months, E 2b.)360
- In 4- to 5-year-old children, after an average of 4.6 months, symptoms were reduced only in the inattentive subtype, with elimination of the day-night fluctuation; in the hyperactive-impulsive subtype (including social behavior disorders), symptoms remained unchanged (Controlled before-and-after study, N = 148, n = 107, average 4.6 months, E 2b.)362
MPH improved comorbid depression in children with ADHD without altering the serum melatonin profile. Nighttime excretion of 6-sulfatoxymelatonin decreased in both ADHD subtypes studied. (Open-label before-and-after study, n = 136, mean 4.6 months, E 2b.)363
In healthy students, MPH (20 mg) enhanced learning from rewards compared to punishment in those with high working memory capacity and impaired it in those with low working memory capacity. (RCT, crossover, n = 19, single dose, E 1b.)364
Visentin R, Dalla Man C, Kovatchev B, Cobelli C (2014): The university of Virginia/Padova type 1 diabetes simulator matches the glucose traces of a clinical trial. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Jul;16(7):428-34. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0377. PMID: 24571584; PMCID: PMC4074748. ↥
Gutiérrez-Casares JR, Quintero J, Segú-Vergés C, Rodríguez Monterde P, Pozo-Rubio T, Coma M, Montoto C (2023): In silico clinical trial evaluating lisdexamfetamine’s and methylphenidate’s mechanism of action computational models in an attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder virtual patients’ population. Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 2;14:939650. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.939650. PMID: 37333910; PMCID: PMC10273406. ↥
Steinhausen, Rothenberger, Döpfner (2010): Handbuch ADHS, Seite 84, 85 ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥
Berridge CW, Stalnaker TA (2002): Relationship between low-dose amphetamine-induced arousal and extracellular norepinephrine and dopamine levels within prefrontal cortex. Synapse. 2002 Dec 1;46(3):140-9. doi: 10.1002/syn.10131. PMID: 12325041. ↥
Arnsten AF, Dudley AG (2005): Methylphenidate improves prefrontal cortical cognitive function through alpha2 adrenoceptor and dopamine D1 receptor actions: Relevance to therapeutic effects in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Behav Brain Funct. 2005 Apr 22;1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-1-2. PMID: 15916700; PMCID: PMC1143775. ↥
Kuczenski R, Segal DS (2001): Locomotor effects of acute and repeated threshold doses of amphetamine and methylphenidate: relative roles of dopamine and norepinephrine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001 Mar;296(3):876-83. PMID: 11181919. ↥
Kuczenski R, Segal DS (2002): Exposure of adolescent rats to oral methylphenidate: preferential effects on extracellular norepinephrine and absence of sensitization and cross-sensitization to methamphetamine. J Neurosci. 2002 Aug 15;22(16):7264-71. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-16-07264.2002. PMID: 12177221; PMCID: PMC6757883. ↥ ↥
Bymaster FP, Katner JS, Nelson DL, et al. Atomoxetine increases extracellular levels of norepinephrine and dopamine in prefrontal cortex of rat: a potential mechanism for efficacy in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002;27:699–711. ↥ ↥
Di Miceli, Derf, Gronier (2022): Consequences of Acute or Chronic Methylphenidate Exposure Using Ex Vivo Neurochemistry and In Vivo Electrophysiology in the Prefrontal Cortex and Striatum of Rats. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Aug 2;23(15):8588. doi: 10.3390/ijms23158588. PMID: 35955717; PMCID: PMC9369023. ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥
Koda K, Ago Y, Cong Y, Kita Y, Takuma K, Matsuda T (2010): Effects of acute and chronic administration of atomoxetine and methylphenidate on extracellular levels of noradrenaline, dopamine and serotonin in the prefrontal cortex and striatum of mice. J Neurochem. 2010 Jul;114(1):259-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06750.x. PMID: 20403082. ↥ ↥ ↥
Berridge CW, Devilbiss DM, Andrzejewski ME, Arnsten AF, Kelley AE, Schmeichel B, Hamilton C, Spencer RC (2006): Methylphenidate preferentially increases catecholamine neurotransmission within the prefrontal cortex at low doses that enhance cognitive function. Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Nov 15;60(10):1111-20. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.04.022. PMID: 16806100. ↥
Kodama T, Kojima T, Honda Y, Hosokawa T, Tsutsui KI, Watanabe M (2017): Oral Administration of Methylphenidate (Ritalin) Affects Dopamine Release Differentially Between the Prefrontal Cortex and Striatum: A Microdialysis Study in the Monkey. J Neurosci. 2017 Mar 1;37(9):2387-2394. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2155-16.2017. PMID: 28154152; PMCID: PMC6596846. ↥
Gatzke-Kopp, Beauchaine (2007): Central nervous system substrates of impulsivity: Implications for the development of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and conduct disorder. In: Coch, Dawson, Fischer ( Eds): Human behavior, learning, and the developing brain: Atypical development. New York: Guilford Press; 2007. pp. 239–263; 245 ↥ ↥
Ruskin DN, Bergstrom DA, Shenker A, Freeman LE, Baek D, Walters JR (2001): Drugs used in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder affect postsynaptic firing rate and oscillation without preferential dopamine autoreceptor action. Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Feb 15;49(4):340-50. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)00987-2. PMID: 11239905. ↥ ↥ ↥
Federici M, Latagliata EC, Ledonne A, Rizzo FR, Feligioni M, Sulzer D, Dunn M, Sames D, Gu H, Nisticò R, Puglisi-Allegra S, Mercuri NB (2014): Paradoxical abatement of striatal dopaminergic transmission by cocaine and methylphenidate. J Biol Chem. 2014 Jan 3;289(1):264-74. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.495499. PMID: 24280216; PMCID: PMC3879549. ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥
Fuller, Burrell, Yee, Liyanagama, Lipski, Wickens, Hyland (2019): Role of homeostatic feedback mechanisms in modulating methylphenidate actions on phasic dopamine signaling in the striatum of awake behaving rats. Prog Neurobiol. 2019 Nov;182:101681. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.101681. PMID: 31412279. ↥ ↥ ↥
Evers EA, Stiers P, Ramaekers JG (2017): High reward expectancy during methylphenidate depresses the dopaminergic response to gain and loss. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Feb 1;12(2):311-318. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw124. PMID: 27677943; PMCID: PMC5390715. ↥ ↥ ↥
Swanson JM, Volkow ND (2002): Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of stimulants: implications for the design of new treatments for ADHD. Behav Brain Res. 2002 Mar 10;130(1-2):73-8. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00433-8. PMID: 11864720. REVIEW ↥
Zhou, Wang, Han, Ma, Yuan, Song (2019): Baicalin regulates the dopamine system to control the core symptoms of ADHD. Mol Brain. 2019 Feb 8;12(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13041-019-0428-5. PMID: 30736828; PMCID: PMC6368814. ↥
Volkow ND, Wang G, Fowler JS, Logan J, Gerasimov M, Maynard L, Ding Y, Gatley SJ, Gifford A, Franceschi D (2001): Therapeutic doses of oral methylphenidate significantly increase extracellular dopamine in the human brain. J Neurosci. 2001 Jan 15;21(2):RC121. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-02-j0001.2001. PMID: 11160455; PMCID: PMC6763805. ↥
Montgomery AJ, Asselin MC, Farde L, Grasby PM (2007): Measurement of methylphenidate-induced change in extrastriatal dopamine concentration using [11C]FLB 457 PET. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007 Feb;27(2):369-77. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600339. PMID: 16685253. ↥ ↥
Udo de Haes JI, Kortekaas R, Van Waarde A, Maguire RP, Pruim J, den Boer JA (2005): Assessment of methylphenidate-induced changes in binding of continuously infused [(11)C]-raclopride in healthy human subjects: correlation with subjective effects. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Dec;183(3):322-30. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0193-2. PMID: 16220327. ↥ ↥
Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Telang F, Maynard L, Logan J, Gatley SJ, Pappas N, Wong C, Vaska P, Zhu W, Swanson JM (2004): Evidence that methylphenidate enhances the saliency of a mathematical task by increasing dopamine in the human brain. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;161(7):1173-80. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.7.1173. PMID: 15229048. ↥
Tomasi D, Manza P, Logan J, Shokri-Kojori E, Yonga MV, Kroll D, Feldman D, McPherson K, Biesecker C, Dennis E, Johnson A, Yuan K, Wang WT, Butman JA, Wang GJ, Volkow ND (2023): Time-varying SUVr reflects the dynamics of dopamine increases during methylphenidate challenges in humans. Commun Biol. 2023 Feb 10;6(1):166. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04545-3. PMID: 36765261; PMCID: PMC9918528. ↥
Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang GJ, Ding YS, Gatley SJ (2002): Role of dopamine in the therapeutic and reinforcing effects of methylphenidate in humans: results from imaging studies. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2002 Dec;12(6):557-66. doi: 10.1016/s0924-977x(02)00104-9. PMID: 12468018. REVIEW ↥ ↥ ↥
Manza P, Shokri-Kojori E, Wiers CE, Kroll D, Feldman D, McPherson K, Biesecker E, Dennis E, Johnson A, Kelleher A, Qu S, Tomasi D, Wang GJ, Volkow ND (2022): Sex differences in methylphenidate-induced dopamine increases in ventral striatum. Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;27(2):939-946. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01294-9. PMID: 34707237; PMCID: PMC9043036. ↥
Heal DJ, Smith SL, Kulkarni RS, Rowley HL (2008): New perspectives from microdialysis studies in freely-moving, spontaneously hypertensive rats on the pharmacology of drugs for the treatment of ADHD. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2008 Aug;90(2):184-97. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.03.016. PMID: 18456311. REVIEW ↥
Walker QD, Morris SE, Arrant AE, Nagel JM, Parylak S, Zhou G, Caster JM, Kuhn CM (2010): Dopamine uptake inhibitors but not dopamine releasers induce greater increases in motor behavior and extracellular dopamine in adolescent rats than in adult male rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010 Oct;335(1):124-32. doi: 10.1124/jpet.110.167320. PMID: 20605908; PMCID: PMC2957786. ↥
Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Logan J, Franceschi D, Maynard L, Ding YS, Gatley SJ, Gifford A, Zhu W, Swanson JM (2002): Relationship between blockade of dopamine transporters by oral methylphenidate and the increases in extracellular dopamine: therapeutic implications. Synapse. 2002 Mar 1;43(3):181-7. doi: 10.1002/syn.10038. PMID: 11793423. ↥
Clatworthy PL, Lewis SJ, Brichard L, Hong YT, Izquierdo D, Clark L, Cools R, Aigbirhio FI, Baron JC, Fryer TD, Robbins TW (2009): Dopamine release in dissociable striatal subregions predicts the different effects of oral methylphenidate on reversal learning and spatial working memory. J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 15;29(15):4690-6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3266-08.2009. PMID: 19369539; PMCID: PMC6665353. ↥
Rosa-Neto P, Lou HC, Cumming P, Pryds O, Karrebaek H, Lunding J, Gjedde A (2005): Methylphenidate-evoked changes in striatal dopamine correlate with inattention and impulsivity in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neuroimage. 2005 Apr 15;25(3):868-76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.031. PMID: 15808987. ↥
Rosa Neto P, Lou H, Cumming P, Pryds O, Gjedde A (2002): Methylphenidate-evoked potentiation of extracellular dopamine in the brain of adolescents with premature birth: correlation with attentional deficit. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Jun;965:434-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04184.x. PMID: 12105118. ↥
Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Newcorn J, Telang F, Solanto MV, Fowler JS, Logan J, Ma Y, Schulz K, Pradhan K, Wong C, Swanson JM (2007): Depressed dopamine activity in caudate and preliminary evidence of limbic involvement in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;64(8):932-40. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.8.932. PMID: 17679638. ↥
Russell, Sagvolden, Johansen (2005): Animal models of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behav Brain Funct. 2005 Jul 15;1:9. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-1-9. PMID: 16022733; PMCID: PMC1180819. ↥
Seeman P, Madras B (2002): Methylphenidate elevates resting dopamine which lowers the impulse-triggered release of dopamine: a hypothesis. Behav Brain Res. 2002 Mar 10;130(1-2):79-83. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00435-1. PMID: 11864721. ↥
Li YT, Huang YL, Chen JJ, Hyland BI, Wickens JR (2024): Phasic dopamine signals are reduced in the spontaneously hypertensive rat and increased by methylphenidate. Eur J Neurosci. 2024 Apr;59(7):1567-1584. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16269. PMID: 38314648. ↥
Dela Peña IC, Shen G, Shi WX (2018): Methylphenidate significantly alters the functional coupling between the prefrontal cortex and dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area. Neuropharmacology. 2018 Mar 15;131:431-439. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.01.015. PMID: 29339293. ↥
Shi WX, Pun CL, Zhou Y (2004): Psychostimulants induce low-frequency oscillations in the firing activity of dopamine neurons. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004 Dec;29(12):2160-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300534. PMID: 15257309. ↥
Di Miceli M, Omoloye A, Gronier B (2022): Characterisation of methylphenidate-induced excitation in midbrain dopamine neurons, an electrophysiological study in the rat brain. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 10;112:110406. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110406. PMID: 34339759. ↥
Federici M, Geracitano R, Bernardi G, Mercuri NB (2005): Actions of methylphenidate on dopaminergic neurons of the ventral midbrain. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Feb 15;57(4):361-5. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.11.030. PMID: 15705351. ↥
Rebec GV, Segal DS (1978): Dose-dependent biphasic alterations in the spontaneous activity of neurons in the rat neostriatum produced by d-amphetamine and methylphenidate. Brain Res. 1978 Jul 14;150(2):353-66. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90286-x. PMID: 567085. ↥
Stahl (2013): Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology, 4. Auflage, Chapter 12: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and its treatment, Seite 490 ↥ ↥
Seeman P, Madras BK (1998): Anti-hyperactivity medication: methylphenidate and amphetamine. Mol Psychiatry. 1998 Sep;3(5):386-96. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000421. PMID: 9774771. REVIEW ↥ ↥
Roessner, Sagvolden, Dasbanerjee, Middleton, Faraone, Walaas, Becker, Rothenberger, Bock (2010): Neuroscience. 2010 Jun 2;167(4):1183-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.02.073. ↥
Robison LS, Ananth M, Hadjiargyrou M, Komatsu DE, Thanos PK (2017): Chronic oral methylphenidate treatment reversibly increases striatal dopamine transporter and dopamine type 1 receptor binding in rats. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2017 May;124(5):655-667. doi: 10.1007/s00702-017-1680-4. PMID: 28116523; PMCID: PMC5400672. ↥ ↥
Hauger, Angel, Janowsky, Berger, Hulihan-Giblin (1990): Brain Recognition Sites for Methylphenidate and the Amphetamines; Their Relationship to the Dopamine Transport Complex, Glucoreceptors, and Serotonergic Neurotransmission in the Central Nervous System; in: Application of Basic Neuroscience to Child Psychiatry, Seiten 77-100 ↥
Jaeschke RR, Sujkowska E, Sowa-Kućma M (2021): Methylphenidate for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults: a narrative review. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021 Oct;238(10):2667-2691. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-05946-0. PMID: 34436651; PMCID: PMC8455398. REVIEW ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥
Gatley, Pan, Chen, Chaturvedi, Ding (1996): Affinities of methylphenidate derivatives for dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin transporters. Life Sci. 1996;58(12):231-9. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(96)00052-5. PMID: 8786705. ↥
Lagamjis G, Lu H, Roeder NM, Richardson BJ, Marion M, Quattrin T, Mastrandrea LD, Hadjiargyrou M, Komatsu DE, Thanos PK (2025): Combined Chronic Oral Methylphenidate and Fluoxetine Decreases D2R Levels in the Caudate Putamen and Nucleus Accumbens. Neurochem Res. 2025 Jul 11;50(4):230. doi: 10.1007/s11064-025-04481-0. PMID: 40643764; PMCID: PMC12254183. ↥ ↥ ↥
Krause, la Fougere, Krause, Ackenheil, Dresel (2005): Influence of striatal dopamine transporter availability on the response to methylphenidate in adult patients with ADHD; European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience; December 2005, Volume 255, Issue 6, pp 428–431, Achtung, geringe Probandenzahl von n = 18 ↥
Wang, Volkow, Wigal, Kollins, Newcorn, Telang, Logan, Jayne, Wong, Han, Fowler, Zhu, Swanson (2013): Long-Term Stimulant Treatment Affects Brain Dopamine Transporter Level in Patients with Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder. PLoS ONE 8(5): e63023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063023 ↥ ↥
Crunelle CL, van den Brink W, Veltman DJ, van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen K, Dom G, Schoevers RA, Booij J (2013): Low dopamine transporter occupancy by methylphenidate as a possible reason for reduced treatment effectiveness in ADHD patients with cocaine dependence. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 Dec;23(12):1714-23. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.05.002. PMID: 23731497. ↥
Takamatsu, Hagino, Sato, Takahashi, Nagasawa, Kubo, Mizuguchi, Uhl, Sora, Ikeda (2015):Improvement of Learning and Increase in Dopamine Level in the Frontal Cortex by Methylphenidate in Mice Lacking Dopamine Transporter; 1 Curr Mol Med. 2015 Mar; 15(3): 245–252. doi: 10.2174/1566524015666150330144018, PMCID: PMC5384353 ↥
Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Gatley SJ, Logan J, Ding YS, Hitzemann R, Pappas N (1998): Dopamine transporter occupancies in the human brain induced by therapeutic doses of oral methylphenidate. Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Oct;155(10):1325-31. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.10.1325. PMID: 9766762. ↥ ↥
Nikolaus S, Antke C, Beu M, Kley K, Larisch R, Wirrwar A, Müller HW (2007): In-vivo quantification of dose-dependent dopamine transporter blockade in the rat striatum with small animal SPECT. Nucl Med Commun. 2007 Mar;28(3):207-13. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328014a0df. PMID: 17264780. ↥
Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang G, Ding Y, Gatley SJ (2002): Mechanism of action of methylphenidate: insights from PET imaging studies. J Atten Disord. 2002;6 Suppl 1:S31-43. doi: 10.1177/070674370200601s05. PMID: 12685517. ↥
Gatley SJ, Volkow ND, Gifford AN, Fowler JS, Dewey SL, Ding YS, Logan J (1999): Dopamine-transporter occupancy after intravenous doses of cocaine and methylphenidate in mice and humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Sep 1;146(1):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s002130051093. PMID: 10485970. ↥
Dresel S, Krause J, Krause KH, LaFougere C, Brinkbaumer K, Kung HF, Hahn K, Tatsch K (2000): Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: binding of [99mTc]TRODAT-1 to the dopamine transporter before and after methylphenidate treatment. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000 Oct;27(10):1518-24. doi: 10.1007/s002590000330. PMID: 11083541. ↥
Krause KH, Dresel SH, Krause J, Kung HF, Tatsch K (2000): Increased striatal dopamine transporter in adult patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: effects of methylphenidate as measured by single photon emission computed tomography. Neurosci Lett. 2000 May 12;285(2):107-10. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)01040-5. PMID: 10793238. ↥
Aster HC, Romanos M, Walitza S, Gerlach M, Muhlberger A, Rizzo A, Andreatta M, Hasenauer N, Hartrampf PE, Nerlich K, Reiners C, Lorenz R, Buck AK, Deserno L (2022): Responsivity of the Striatal Dopamine System to Methylphenidate-A Within-Subject I-123-beta-CIT-SPECT Study in Male Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:804730. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.804730. PMID: 35492708; PMCID: PMC9046584. ↥
Oya M, Matsuoka K, Kubota M, Kitamura S, Kataoka Y, Kokubo N, Takahata K, Seki C, Endo H, Tagai K, Takado Y, Hirata K, Ichihashi M, Kurose S, Kato N, Sugihara G, Shimizu M, Takagi S, Ito W, Nakamura M, Higuchi M, Takahashi H (2026): Effects of Extended-Release Methylphenidate on Dopamine and Norepinephrine Transporters in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Longitudinal Dual-Tracer PET Study. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2026 Jan;80(1):48-54. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13911. PMID: 41128391; PMCID: PMC12757760. ↥
Dar DE, Mayo C, Uhl GR (2005): The interaction of methylphenidate and benztropine with the dopamine transporter is different than other substrates and ligands. Biochem Pharmacol. 2005 Aug 1;70(3):461-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.04.032. PMID: 15950948. ↥
Niello M, Sideromenos S, Gradisch R, O Shea R, Schwazer J, Maier J, Kastner N, Sandtner W, Jantsch K, Lupica CR, Hoffman AF, Lubec G, Loland CJ, Stockner T, Pollak DD, Baumann MH, Sitte HH (2023): Persistent binding at dopamine transporters determines sustained psychostimulant effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Feb 7;120(6):e2114204120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2114204120. PMID: 36730201; PMCID: PMC9963675. ↥
Ide S, Ikekubo Y, Hua J, Takamatsu Y, Uhl GR, Sora I, Ikeda K (2018): Reward-enhancing effect of methylphenidate is abolished in dopamine transporter knockout mice: A model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2018 Sep;38(3):149-153. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12020. PMID: 30175528; PMCID: PMC7292327. ↥
Zetterström TSC, Quansah E, Grootveld M (2022): Effects of Methylphenidate on the Dopamine Transporter and Beyond. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2022;57:127-157. doi: 10.1007/7854_2022_333. PMID: 35507284. ↥
Calipari ES, Ferris MJ, Siciliano CA, Jones SR (2015): Differential influence of dopamine transport rate on the potencies of cocaine, amphetamine, and methylphenidate. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2015 Jan 21;6(1):155-62. doi: 10.1021/cn500262x. PMID: 25474655; PMCID: PMC4304485. ↥
Crunelle CL, van den Brink W, Dom G, Booij J (2014): Dopamine transporter occupancy by methylphenidate and impulsivity in adult ADHD. Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;204(6):486-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.132977. PMID: 24676965. ↥
Diamond: Attention-deficit disorder (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder without hyperactivity): A neurobiologically and behaviorally distinct disorder from attention-deficit (with hyperactivity), Development and Psychopathology 17 (2005), 807–825, Seite 811 ↥
Müller, Candrian, Kropotov (2011), ADHS – Neurodiagnostik in der Praxis, Springer ↥
Solanto (1998): Neuropsychopharmacological mechanisms of stimulant drug action in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a review and integration. Behav Brain Res. 1998 Jul;94(1):127-52. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(97)00175-7. PMID: 9708845. REVIEW ↥ ↥
https://www.kinderaerzte-im-netz.de/media/53ec94e833af614b730097d1/source/20080530092715_adhs2.pdf ↥
Markowitz, Patrick (2001): Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions in the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2001;40(10):753-72 ↥ ↥
Butcher SP, Liptrot J, Aburthnott GW (1991): Characterisation of methylphenidate and nomifensine induced dopamine release in rat striatum using in vivo brain microdialysis. Neurosci Lett. 1991 Jan 28;122(2):245-8. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(91)90869-u. PMID: 1902922. ↥
Chadchankar H, Ihalainen J, Tanila H, Yavich L (2012): Methylphenidate modifies overflow and presynaptic compartmentalization of dopamine via an alpha-synuclein-dependent mechanism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012 May;341(2):484-92. doi: 10.1124/jpet.111.189225. PMID: 22344407. ↥
Steinhausen, Rothenberger, Döpfner (2020): Handbuch ADHS 2. Aufl., Seite 92 ↥
Volkow, Wang, Fowler, Logan, Angrist, Hitzemann, Lieberman, Pappas (1997): Effects of methylphenidate on regional brain glucose metabolism in humans: relationship to dopamine D2 receptors.Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Jan;154(1):50-5, sehr niedrige Probandenzahl von n = 15 ↥
Steinhausen, Rothenberger, Döpfner (2010): Handbuch ADHS, Seite 78 ↥
Oades RD, Sadile AG, Sagvolden T, Viggiano D, Zuddas A, Devoto P, Aase H, Johansen EB, Ruocco LA, Russell VA (2005): The control of responsiveness in ADHD by catecholamines: evidence for dopaminergic, noradrenergic and interactive roles. Dev Sci. 2005 Mar;8(2):122-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00399.x. PMID: 15720370. REVIEW ↥
Marco EM, Adriani W, Ruocco LA, Canese R, Sadile AG, Laviola G (2011): Neurobehavioral adaptations to methylphenidate: the issue of early adolescent exposure. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Aug;35(8):1722-39. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.011. PMID: 21376076. REVIEW ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥
Jenson D, Yang K, Acevedo-Rodriguez A, Levine A, Broussard JI, Tang J, Dani JA (2015): Dopamine and norepinephrine receptors participate in methylphenidate enhancement of in vivo hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Neuropharmacology. 2015 Mar;90:23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.10.029. PMID: 25445492; PMCID: PMC4533926. ↥
del Campo N, Fryer TD, Hong YT, Smith R, Brichard L, Acosta-Cabronero J, Chamberlain SR, Tait R, Izquierdo D, Regenthal R, Dowson J, Suckling J, Baron JC, Aigbirhio FI, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ, Muller U (2013): A positron emission tomography study of nigro-striatal dopaminergic mechanisms underlying attention: implications for ADHD and its treatment. Brain. 2013 Nov;136(Pt 11):3252-70. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt263. PMID: 24163364; PMCID: PMC4125626. ↥
Quansah, Ruiz-Rodado, Grootveld, Zetterström (2018): Methylphenidate alters monoaminergic and metabolic pathways in the cerebellum of adolescent rats. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 Feb 22. pii: S0924-977X(18)30043-9. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.02.002. ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥
Quansah, Zetterström (2019): Chronic methylphenidate preferentially alters catecholamine protein targets in the parietal cortex and ventral striatum. Neurochem Int. 2019 Jan 17;124:193-199. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2019.01.016. ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥
Volz TJ, Farnsworth SJ, King JL, Riddle EL, Hanson GR, Fleckenstein AE (2007): Methylphenidate administration alters vesicular monoamine transporter-2 function in cytoplasmic and membrane-associated vesicles. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007 Nov;323(2):738-45. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.126888. PMID: 17693585. ↥
Volz TJ, Farnsworth SJ, Hanson GR, Fleckenstein AE (2008): Methylphenidate-induced alterations in synaptic vesicle trafficking and activity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Oct;1139:285-90. doi: 10.1196/annals.1432.012. PMID: 18991873; PMCID: PMC2678903. ↥
Riddle EL, Hanson GR, Fleckenstein AE (2007): Therapeutic doses of amphetamine and methylphenidate selectively redistribute the vesicular monoamine transporter-2. Eur J Pharmacol. 2007 Sep 24;571(1):25-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.05.044. PMID: 17618619; PMCID: PMC2581712. ↥
Sandoval V, Riddle EL, Hanson GR, Fleckenstein AE (2002): Methylphenidate redistributes vesicular monoamine transporter-2: role of dopamine receptors. J Neurosci. 2002 Oct 1;22(19):8705-10. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-19-08705.2002. PMID: 12351745; PMCID: PMC6757793. ↥
Volz TJ, Farnsworth SJ, Rowley SD, Hanson GR, Fleckenstein AE (2008): Methylphenidate-induced increases in vesicular dopamine sequestration and dopamine release in the striatum: the role of muscarinic and dopamine D2 receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008 Oct;327(1):161-7. doi: 10.1124/jpet.108.139386. PMID: 18591219; PMCID: PMC2574590. ↥
Sandoval V, Riddle EL, Hanson GR, Fleckenstein AE (2003): Methylphenidate alters vesicular monoamine transport and prevents methamphetamine-induced dopaminergic deficits. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003 Mar;304(3):1181-7. doi: 10.1124/jpet.102.045005. PMID: 12604695. ↥
Kim, Heo, Kim, Ko, Lee, Kim, Kim, Kim, Ji, Kim, Shin, Choi, Kim (2011): Treadmill exercise and methylphenidate ameliorate symptoms of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder through enhancing dopamine synthesis and brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in spontaneous hypertensive rats. Neurosci Lett. 2011 Oct 17;504(1):35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.08.052. PMID: 21907264. ↥
Panos, O’Callaghan, Miller, Ferguson (2014): Effects of developmental methylphenidate (MPH) treatment on monoamine neurochemistry of male and female rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2014 Sep-Oct;45:70-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2014.08.001. PMID: 25132048. ↥
Bartl, Palazzesi, Parrinello, Hommers, Riederer, Walitza, Grünblatt (2017): The impact of methylphenidate and its enantiomers on dopamine synthesis and metabolism in vitro. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 3;79(Pt B):281-288. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.07.002. PMID: 28690202. ↥
Stevens, Sangkuhl, Brown, Altman, Klein (2019): PharmGKB summary: methylphenidate pathway, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2019 Aug;29(6):136-154. doi: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000376. PMID: 30950912; PMCID: PMC6581573. ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥
Schabram I, Henkel K, Mohammadkhani Shali S, Dietrich C, Schmaljohann J, Winz O, Prinz S, Rademacher L, Neumaier B, Felzen M, Kumakura Y, Cumming P, Mottaghy FM, Gründer G, Vernaleken I (2014): Acute and sustained effects of methylphenidate on cognition and presynaptic dopamine metabolism: an [18F]FDOPA PET study. J Neurosci. 2014 Oct 29;34(44):14769-76. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1560-14.2014. PMID: 25355228; PMCID: PMC6608425. ↥
Nielsen JA, Chapin DS, Moore KE (1983): Differential effects of d-amphetamine, beta-phenylethylamine, cocaine and methylphenidate on the rate of dopamine synthesis in terminals of nigrostriatal and mesolimbic neurons and on the efflux of dopamine metabolites into cerebroventricular perfusates of rats. Life Sci. 1983 Nov 7;33(19):1899-907. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(83)90674-4. PMID: 6645784. ↥
Kuczenski R, Segal DS (1975): Differential effects of D- and L-amphetamine and methylphenidate on rat striatal dopamine biosynthesis. Eur J Pharmacol. 1975 Feb;30(2):244-51. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(75)90106-5. PMID: 1126362. ↥
Calipari ES, Ferris MJ, Melchior JR, Bermejo K, Salahpour A, Roberts DC, Jones SR (2014): Methylphenidate and cocaine self-administration produce distinct dopamine terminal alterations. Addict Biol. 2014 Mar;19(2):145-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2012.00456.x. PMID: 22458761; PMCID: PMC3390453. ↥
Uchimura H, Kanai K, Arai M, Inoue M, Hishimoto A, Masukawa D, Goshima Y (2023): Involvement of the L-DOPA receptor GPR143 in acute and chronic actions of methylphenidate. J Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Jul;152(3):178-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jphs.2023.04.006. PMID: 37257945. ↥
Manza P, Tomasi D, Demiral ŞB, Shokri-Kojori E, Lildharrie C, Lin E, Wang GJ, Volkow ND (2025): Neural basis for individual differences in the attention-enhancing effects of methylphenidate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Apr;122(13):e2423785122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2423785122. PMID: 40127280. ↥
Manza P, Shokri-Kojori E, Demiral ŞB, Wiers CE, Zhang R, Giddens N, McPherson K, Biesecker E, Dennis E, Johnson A, Tomasi D, Wang GJ, Volkow ND (2022): Cortical D1 and D2 dopamine receptor availability modulate methylphenidate-induced changes in brain activity and functional connectivity. Commun Biol. 2022 May 30;5(1):514. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03434-5. PMID: 35637272; PMCID: PMC9151821. ↥
Demiral ŞB, Manza P, Biesecker E, Wiers C, Shokri-Kojori E, McPherson K, Dennis E, Johnson A, Tomasi D, Wang GJ, Volkow ND (2022): Striatal D1 and D2 receptor availability are selectively associated with eye-blink rates after methylphenidate treatment. Commun Biol. 2022 Sep 26;5(1):1015. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03979-5. PMID: 36163254; PMCID: PMC9513088. ↥
Tomasi D, Manza P, Demiral ŞB, Yan W, Miller KB, Veenker F, Zhao J, Lildharrie C, Yonga MV, Abey S, VanDine M, Wang GJ, Volkow ND (2025): Methylphenidate reorganizes cortical hierarchy through dopaminergic modulation. Nat Commun. 2025 Dec 13;17(1):791. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-67477-y. PMID: 41390824; PMCID: PMC12824357. ↥
Berridge, Devilbiss, Andrzejewski, Arnsten, Kelley, Schmeichel, Hamilton, Spencer (2006): Methylphenidate Preferentially Increases Catecholamine Neurotransmission within the Prefrontal Cortex at Low Doses that Enhance Cognitive Function; Biological Psychiatry; Volume 60, Issue 10, 15 November 2006, Pages 1111-1120 ↥ ↥
Calipari ES, Ferris MJ, Salahpour A, Caron MG, Jones SR (2013): Methylphenidate amplifies the potency and reinforcing effects of amphetamines by increasing dopamine transporter expression. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2720. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3720. PMID: 24193139; PMCID: PMC4017736. ↥
Westbrook A, van den Bosch R, Määttä JI, Hofmans L, Papadopetraki D, Cools R, Frank MJ (2020): Dopamine promotes cognitive effort by biasing the benefits versus costs of cognitive work. Science. 2020 Mar 20;367(6484):1362-1366. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz5891. PMID: 32193325; PMCID: PMC7430502. ↥
Hofmans L, Papadopetraki D, van den Bosch R, Määttä JI, Frobose MI, Zandbelt BB, Westbrook A, Verkes RJ, Cools R (2020): Methylphenidate boosts choices of mental labor over leisure depending on striatal dopamine synthesis capacity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020 Dec;45(13):2170-2179. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-00834-1. PMID: 32919405; PMCID: PMC7784967. ↥
van den Bosch R, Lambregts B, Määttä J, Hofmans L, Papadopetraki D, Westbrook A, Verkes RJ, Booij J, Cools R (2022): Striatal dopamine dissociates methylphenidate effects on value-based versus surprise-based reversal learning. Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 24;13(1):4962. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32679-1. PMID: 36002446; PMCID: PMC9402573. ↥
Yang Y, Lewis MM, Kong L, Mailman RB (2022): A Dopamine D(1) Agonist Versus Methylphenidate in Modulating Prefrontal Cortical Working Memory. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2022 Aug;382(2):88-99. doi: 10.1124/jpet.122.001215. PMID: 35661631; PMCID: PMC9341252. ↥
Spencer RC, Berridge CW (2019): Receptor and circuit mechanisms underlying differential procognitive actions of psychostimulants. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Sep;44(10):1820-1827. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0314-y. PMID: 30683912; PMCID: PMC6785708. ↥
Koyun AH, Werner A, Kuntke P, Roessner V, Beste C, Stock AK (2025): GABA and Glx levels in cortico-subcortical networks predict catecholaminergic effects on response inhibition. J Psychopharmacol. 2025 Aug;39(8):769-781. doi: 10.1177/02698811251340893. PMID: 40539252; PMCID: PMC12287562. ↥
Koyun AH, Werner A, Kuntke P, Roessner V, Beste C, Stock AK (2025): Dose-Dependent Effects of Catecholaminergic Modulation on Interference Control: Role of Baseline GABA and Glx in Cortico-Subcortical Networks. Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Oct 15;46(15):e70385. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70385. PMID: 41128341; PMCID: PMC12547842. ↥
Tannock R, Schachar RJ, Carr RP, Logan GD (1989): Dose-response effects of methylphenidate on academic performance and overt behavior in hyperactive children. Pediatrics. 1989 Oct;84(4):648-57. PMID: 2780127. ↥
Rapport MD, Stoner G, DuPaul GJ, Birmingham BK, Tucker S (1985): Methylphenidate in hyperactive children: differential effects of dose on academic, learning, and social behavior. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1985 Jun;13(2):227-43. doi: 10.1007/BF00910644. PMID: 3891813. ↥
Cheng J, Xiong Z, Duffney LJ, Wei J, Liu A, Liu S, Chen GJ, Yan Z (2014): Methylphenidate exerts dose-dependent effects on glutamate receptors and behaviors. Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Dec 15;76(12):953-62. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.04.003. PMID: 24832867; PMCID: PMC4194277. ↥ ↥
Panfil K, Small R, Kirkpatrick K (2023): Effects of methylphenidate on impulsive choice and delay aversion in Lewis rats. Behav Pharmacol. 2023 Apr 01;34(2-3):169. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000719. PMID: 36752349; PMCID: PMC10006322. ↥
Ruocco, Carnevale, Treno, Sadile, Melisi, Arra, Ibba, Schirru, Carboni (2010): Prepuberal subchronic methylphenidate and atomoxetine induce different long-term effects on adult behaviour and forebrain dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin in Naples high-excitability rats. Behav Brain Res. 2010 Jun 26;210(1):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.02.020. ↥
Mulvihill (2019): Presynaptic regulation of dopamine release: Role of the DAT and VMAT2 transporters. Neurochem Int. 2019 Jan;122:94-105. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2018.11.004. PMID: 30465801. REVIEW ↥
Lam, Matthies, Graf, Colla, Jacob, Sobanski, Alm, Rösler, Retz, Retz-Junginger, Kis, Abdel-Hamid, Müller, Lücke, Huss, Jans, Berger, Tebartz van Elst, Philipsen (2019): Comparison of Methylphenidate and Psychotherapy in Adult ADHD Study (COMPAS) Consortium. Long-term Effects of Multimodal Treatment on Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms: Follow-up Analysis of the COMPAS Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e194980. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4980. PMID: 31150084; PMCID: PMC6547099. ↥
Alam, Wasi, Naeem, Kashif, Siddiqui, Bashir, Naz, Ikram (2019): Methylphenidate increases the urinary excretion of vanillylmandelic acid in rats that is attenuated by buspirone co-administration. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2019 Mar;32(2):895-898. ↥
Levi-Sachar, Gvirts, Goldwin, Bloch, Shamay-Tsoory, Zagoory-Sharon, Feldman, Maoz (2019): The effect of methylphenidate on social cognition and oxytocin in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Sep 12. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0522-5. n = 90 ↥
Feron FJ, Hendriksen JG, van Kroonenburgh MJ, Blom-Coenjaerts C, Kessels AG, Jolles J, Weber WE, Vles JS (2005): Dopamine transporter in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder normalizes after cessation of methylphenidate. Pediatr Neurol. 2005 Sep;33(3):179-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2005.04.008. PMID: 16139732. ↥
Vles JS, Feron FJ, Hendriksen JG, Jolles J, van Kroonenburgh MJ, Weber WE (2003): Methylphenidate down-regulates the dopamine receptor and transporter system in children with attention deficit hyperkinetic disorder (ADHD). Neuropediatrics. 2003 Apr;34(2):77-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39602. PMID: 12776228. ↥
Hsu SP, Wang DY, Min MY, Fu YS (2019): Long-term challenge of methylphenidate changes the neuronal population and membrane property of dopaminergic neuron in rats. Neurochem Int. 2019 Jan;122:187-195. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2018.11.001. PMID: 30423424. ↥
Zhang X, Talpos J, Berridge MS, Apana SM, Slikker W Jr, Wang C, Paule MG (2021): MicroPET/CT assessment of neurochemical effects in the brain after long-term methylphenidate treatment in nonhuman primates. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2021 Sep-Oct;87:107017. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2021.107017. PMID: 34265415. ↥
Rosenau PT, Openneer TJC, Matthijssen AM, van de Loo-Neus GHH, Buitelaar JK, van den Hoofdakker BJ, Hoekstra PJ, Dietrich A (2021): Effects of methylphenidate on executive functioning in children and adolescents with ADHD after long-term use: a randomized, placebo-controlled discontinuation study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;62(12):1444-1452. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13419. PMID: 33778945; PMCID: PMC9292145. ↥
Tamminga HGH, Reneman L, Schrantee A, Bottelier MA, Bouziane C, Geurts HM, Groenman AP (2021): Do effects of methylphenidate on cognitive performance last beyond treatment? A randomized placebo-controlled trial in boys and men with ADHD. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021 May;46:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.02.002. PMID: 33735707. ↥
Swanson J, Gupta S, Guinta D, Flynn D, Agler D, Lerner M, Williams L, Shoulson I, Wigal S (1999): Acute tolerance to methylphenidate in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Sep;66(3):295-305. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(99)70038-X. PMID: 10511066. ↥
Kimko H, Gibiansky E, Gibiansky L, Starr HL, Berwaerts J, Massarella J, Wiegand F (2012): Population pharmacodynamic modeling of various extended-release formulations of methylphenidate in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder via meta-analysis. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2012 Apr;39(2):161-76. doi: 10.1007/s10928-011-9238-9. PMID: 22270322. METASTUDY, k = 9 ↥
Teicher MH, Polcari A, Foley M, Valente E, McGreenery CE, Chang WW, McKay G, Midha KK (2006): Methylphenidate blood levels and therapeutic response in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: I. Effects of different dosing regimens. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2006 Aug;16(4):416-31. doi: 10.1089/cap.2006.16.416. PMID: 16958567. ↥
Schrantee A, Tamminga HG, Bouziane C, Bottelier MA, Bron EE, Mutsaerts HJ, Zwinderman AH, Groote IR, Rombouts SA, Lindauer RJ, Klein S, Niessen WJ, Opmeer BC, Boer F, Lucassen PJ, Andersen SL, Geurts HM, Reneman L (2016): Age-Dependent Effects of Methylphenidate on the Human Dopaminergic System in Young vs Adult Patients With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;73(9):955-62. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1572. PMID: 27487479; PMCID: PMC5267166. ↥
Tang B, Dafny N (2012): Methylphenidate modulates the locus ceruleus neuronal activity in freely behaving rat. Eur J Pharmacol. 2012 Nov 15;695(1-3):48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.08.016. PMID: 22995580; PMCID: PMC4743872. ↥
Devilbiss DM, Berridge CW (2006): Low-dose methylphenidate actions on tonic and phasic locus coeruleus discharge. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006 Dec;319(3):1327-35. doi: 10.1124/jpet.106.110015. PMID: 16980569. ↥
Kuczenski R, Segal DS (1997): Effects of methylphenidate on extracellular dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine: comparison with amphetamine. J Neurochem. 1997 May;68(5):2032-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.68052032.x. Erratum in: J Neurochem 1997 Sep;69(3):1332. PMID: 9109529. ↥
Hannestad J, Gallezot JD, Planeta-Wilson B, Lin SF, Williams WA, van Dyck CH, Malison RT, Carson RE, Ding YS (2010): Clinically relevant doses of methylphenidate significantly occupy norepinephrine transporters in humans in vivo. Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Nov 1;68(9):854-60. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.06.017. PMID: 20691429; PMCID: PMC3742016. ↥
Somkuwar SS, Kantak KM, Dwoskin LP (2015): Effect of methylphenidate treatment during adolescence on norepinephrine transporter function in orbitofrontal cortex in a rat model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Aug 30;252:55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.02.002. PMID: 25680322; PMCID: PMC4522381. ↥
Drouin C, Page M, Waterhouse B (2006): Methylphenidate enhances noradrenergic transmission and suppresses mid- and long-latency sensory responses in the primary somatosensory cortex of awake rats. J Neurophysiol. 2006 Aug;96(2):622-32. doi: 10.1152/jn.01310.2005. PMID: 16687613. ↥
Marsteller DA, Gerasimov MR, Schiffer WK, Geiger JM, Barnett CR, Schaich Borg J, Scott S, Ceccarelli J, Volkow ND, Molina PE, Alexoff DL, Dewey SL (2002): Acute handling stress modulates methylphenidate-induced catecholamine overflow in the medial prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002 Aug;27(2):163-70. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(02)00288-9. PMID: 12093590. ↥ ↥
Milstein JA, Dalley JW, Robbins TW (2010): Methylphenidate-induced impulsivity: pharmacological antagonism by beta-adrenoreceptor blockade. J Psychopharmacol. 2010 Mar;24(3):309-21. doi: 10.1177/0269881108098146. PMID: 19074531. ↥
Dommett EJ, Henderson EL, Westwell MS, Greenfield SA (2008): Methylphenidate amplifies long-term plasticity in the hippocampus via noradrenergic mechanisms. Learn Mem. 2008 Aug;15(8):580-6. doi: 10.1101/lm.1092608. PMID: 18685149. ↥
Rozas C, Carvallo C, Contreras D, Carreño M, Ugarte G, Delgado R, Zeise ML, Morales B (2015): Methylphenidate amplifies long-term potentiation in rat hippocampus CA1 area involving the insertion of AMPA receptors by activation of β-adrenergic and D1/D5 receptors. Neuropharmacology. 2015 Dec;99:15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.07.003. PMID: 26165920. ↥
Cutando L, Puighermanal E, Castell L, Tarot P, Bertaso F, Bonnavion P, de Kerchove d’Exaerde A, Isingrini E, Galante M, Dallerac G, Pascoli V, Lüscher C, Giros B, Valjent E (2021): Regulation of GluA1 phosphorylation by d-amphetamine and methylphenidate in the cerebellum. Addict Biol. 2021 Jul;26(4):e12995. doi: 10.1111/adb.12995. PMID: 33368923. ↥
Berridge CW, Shumsky JS, Andrzejewski ME, McGaughy JA, Spencer RC, Devilbiss DM, Waterhouse BD (2012): Differential sensitivity to psychostimulants across prefrontal cognitive tasks: differential involvement of noradrenergic α₁ - and α₂-receptors. Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Mar 1;71(5):467-73. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.07.022. PMID: 21890109; PMCID: PMC3233638. ↥
Faraone (2018): The pharmacology of amphetamine and methylphenidate: Relevance to the neurobiology of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and other psychiatric comorbidities. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Apr;87:255-270. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.02.001. PMID: 29428394. ↥ ↥
Gamo, Wang, Arnsten (2010): Methylphenidate and atomoxetine enhance prefrontal function through α2-adrenergic and dopamine D1 receptors. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;49(10):1011-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.06.015. PMID: 20855046; PMCID: PMC2999884. ↥ ↥
Andrews GD, Lavin A (2006): Methylphenidate increases cortical excitability via activation of alpha-2 noradrenergic receptors. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006 Mar;31(3):594-601. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300818. PMID: 15999146; PMCID: PMC5509071. ↥
Kidani Y, Ishimatsu M, Akasu T (2010): Methylphenidate enhances inhibitory synaptic transmission by increasing the content of norepinephrine in the locus coeruleus of juvenile rats. Kurume Med J. 2010;57(1-2):29-38. doi: 10.2739/kurumemedj.57.29. PMID: 21727763. ↥
Achterberg EJM, Damsteegt R, Vanderschuren LJMJ (2018): On the central noradrenergic mechanism underlying the social play-suppressant effect of methylphenidate in rats. Behav Brain Res. 2018 Jul 16;347:158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.03.004. PMID: 29526788. ↥
Ihalainen JA, Tanila H, Scheinin M, Riekkinen P Jr (2001): alpha(2C)-Adrenoceptors modulate the effect of methylphenidate on response rate and discrimination accuracy in an operant test. Brain Res Bull. 2001 Mar 15;54(5):553-7. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(01)00449-x. PMID: 11397547. ↥
Gronier B (2011): In vivo electrophysiological effects of methylphenidate in the prefrontal cortex: involvement of dopamine D1 and alpha 2 adrenergic receptors. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Feb;21(2):192-204. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.11.002. PMID: 21146374. ↥
Dinis-Oliveira (2017): Metabolomics of Methylphenidate and Ethylphenidate: Implications in Pharmacological and Toxicological Effects. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2017 Feb;42(1):11-16. doi: 10.1007/s13318-016-0362-1. PMID: 27438788. REVIEW ↥
Rowley HL, Kulkarni RS, Gosden J, Brammer RJ, Hackett D, Heal DJ (2014): Differences in the neurochemical and behavioural profiles of lisdexamfetamine methylphenidate and modafinil revealed by simultaneous dual-probe microdialysis and locomotor activity measurements in freely-moving rats. J Psychopharmacol. 2014 Mar;28(3):254-69. doi: 10.1177/0269881113513850. PMID: 24327450. ↥
Leonard, McCartan, White, King (2004): Methylphenidate: a review of its neuropharmacological, neuropsychological and adverse clinical effects. Hum. Psychopharmacol. Clin. Exp., 19: 151–180. REVIEW ↥
Garattini, Mennini (1988): Critical Notes on The Specificity of Drugs in The Study of Metabolism and Functions of Brain Monoamines; International Review of Neurobiology; Volume 29, 1988, Pages 259–280, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7742(08)60089-6, zitiert nach Trott, Wirth (2000): die Pharmakotherapie der hyperkinetischen Störungen; in: Steinhausen (Herausgeber): Hyperkinetischen Störungen bei Kindern, Jugendlichen und Erwachsenen, 2. Aufl., Seite 210 REVIEW ↥
Weikop P, Yoshitake T, Kehr J (2007): Differential effects of adjunctive methylphenidate and citalopram on extracellular levels of serotonin, noradrenaline and dopamine in the rat brain. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2007 Oct;17(10):658-71. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2007.02.014. PMID: 17383162. ↥
Borycz J, Zapata A, Quiroz C, Volkow ND, Ferré S (2008): 5-HT 1B receptor-mediated serotoninergic modulation of methylphenidate-induced locomotor activation in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008 Feb;33(3):619-26. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301445. PMID: 17487226. ↥ ↥
Daniali S, Madjd Z, Shahbazi A, Niknazar S, Shahbazzadeh D (2013): Chronic Ritalin administration during adulthood increases serotonin pool in rat medial frontal cortex. Iran Biomed J. 2013;17(3):134-9. doi: 10.6091/ibj.1173.2013. PMID: 23748891; PMCID: PMC3770255. ↥
Roessner V, Manzke T, Becker A, Rothenberger A, Bock N (2009): Development of 5-HT transporter density and long-term effects of methylphenidate in an animal model of ADHD. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2009;10(4 Pt 2):581-5. doi: 10.1080/15622970802653709. PMID: 19172439. ↥
Molina-Carballo A, Naranjo-Gómez A, Uberos J, Justicia-Martínez F, Ruiz-Ramos MJ, Cubero-Millán I, Contreras-Chova F, Augustin-Morales MD, Khaldy-Belkadi H, Muñoz-Hoyos A (2013): Methylphenidate effects on blood serotonin and melatonin levels may help to synchronise biological rhythms in children with ADHD. J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Mar;47(3):377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.09.020. PMID: 23088865. ↥
Markowitz, DeVane, Ramamoorthy, Zhu (2009): The psychostimulant d-threo-(R,R)-methylphenidate binds as an agonist to the 5HT(1A) receptor. Pharmazie. 2009 Feb;64(2):123-5. ↥ ↥
Salman T, Nawaz S, Waraich RS, Haleem DJ (2019): Repeated administration of methylphenidate produces reinforcement and downregulates 5-HT-1A receptor expression in the nucleus accumbens. Life Sci. 2019 Feb 1;218:139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2018.12.046. PMID: 30594665. ↥ ↥ ↥
Haleem DJ, Salman T, Nawaz S, Ikram H (2022): Co-treatment with low doses of buspirone prevents rewarding effects of methylphenidate and upregulates expression of 5-HT1A receptor mRNA in the nucleus accumbens. Behav Brain Res. 2022 Feb 10;418:113660. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113660. PMID: 34752844. ↥
Alam N, Najam R, Khan SS (2015): Attenuation of methylphenidate-induced tolerance on cognition by buspirone co-administration. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2015 Sep;28(5):1601-5. PMID: 26408868. ↥
Salman T, Afroz R, Nawaz S, Mahmood K, Haleem DJ, Zarina S (2021): Differential effects of memory enhancing and impairing doses of methylphenidate on serotonin metabolism and 5-HT1A, GABA, glutamate receptor expression in the rat prefrontal cortex. Biochimie. 2021 Dec;191:51-61. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2021.08.009. PMID: 34454977. ↥ ↥ ↥
Farhan M, Riaz F, Wali S, Rafiq H (2019): Desensitization of 5-HT-1A Somatodentritic Receptors in Tryptophan Treated and Co-treated Rats Induced by Methylphenidate. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2019;14(2):125-131. doi: 10.2174/1574884713666181112123309. PMID: 30417792. ↥
Markowitz JS, DeVane CL, Pestreich LK, Patrick KS, Muniz R (2006): A comprehensive in vitro screening of d-, l-, and dl-threo-methylphenidate: an exploratory study. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2006 Dec;16(6):687-98. doi: 10.1089/cap.2006.16.687. PMID: 17201613. ↥
Fernández-Lópe, Molina-Carballo, Cubero-Millán, Checa-Ros, Machado-Casas, Blanca-Jover, Jerez-Calero, Madrid-Fernández, Uberos, Muñoz-Hoyos (2020): Indole Tryptophan Metabolism and Cytokine S100B in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Daily Fluctuations, Responses to Methylphenidate, and Interrelationship with Depressive Symptomatology. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2020 Feb 12. doi: 10.1089/cap.2019.0072. PMID: 32048862. ↥
Kuczenski R, Segal DS, Leith NJ, Applegate CD (1987): Effects of amphetamine, methylphenidate, and apomorphine on regional brain serotonin and 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1987;93(3):329-35. doi: 10.1007/BF00187252. PMID: 2448842. ↥
Yuan A, Claussen C, Jones Z, Tang B, Dafny N (2023): Methylphenidate induces a different response in the dorsal raphe as compared to ventral tegmental area and locus coeruleus: behavioral and concomitant neuronal recordings in adult rats. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2023 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s00702-023-02665-y. PMID: 37391573. ↥
Kharas N, Whitt H, Reyes-Vasquez C, Dafny N (2017): Methylphenidate modulates dorsal raphe neuronal activity: Behavioral and neuronal recordings from adolescent rats. Brain Res Bull. 2017 Jan;128:48-57. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2016.10.011. PMID: 27889580; PMCID: PMC5224521. ↥
Dafny N, Elizondo GM, Perez-Vasquez C (2024): Differential Impact of Serotonin Signaling Methylphenidate on Young versus Adult: Insights from Behavioral and Dorsal Raphe Nucleus Neuronal Recordings from Freely Behaving Rats. Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 24;25(15):8082. doi: 10.3390/ijms25158082. PMID: 39125652; PMCID: PMC11311813. ↥
Madras, Miller, Fischman (2005): The dopamine transporter and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jun 1;57(11):1397-409. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.011. PMID: 15950014. ↥ ↥
Han DD, Gu HH (2006): Comparison of the monoamine transporters from human and mouse in their sensitivities to psychostimulant drugs. BMC Pharmacol. 2006 Mar 3;6:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2210-6-6. PMID: 16515684; PMCID: PMC1448202. ↥ ↥ ↥
John CE, Jones SR (2007): Voltammetric characterization of the effect of monoamine uptake inhibitors and releasers on dopamine and serotonin uptake in mouse caudate-putamen and substantia nigra slices. Neuropharmacology. 2007 Jun;52(8):1596-605. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2007.03.004. PMID: 17459426; PMCID: PMC2041899. ↥ ↥
Easton N, Steward C, Marshall F, Fone K, Marsden C (2007): Effects of amphetamine isomers, methylphenidate and atomoxetine on synaptosomal and synaptic vesicle accumulation and release of dopamine and noradrenaline in vitro in the rat brain. Neuropharmacology. 2007 Feb;52(2):405-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.07.035. PMID: 17020775. ↥ ↥
Taylor D, Ho BT (1978): Comparison of inhibition of monoamine uptake by cocaine, methylphenidate and amphetamine. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol. 1978 Jul;21(1):67-75. PMID: 684280. ↥
Angenoorth TJF, Stankovic S, Niello M, Holy M, Brandt SD, Sitte HH, Maier J (2021): Interaction Profiles of Central Nervous System Active Drugs at Human Organic Cation Transporters 1-3 and Human Plasma Membrane Monoamine Transporter. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Nov 30;22(23):12995. doi: 10.3390/ijms222312995. PMID: 34884800; PMCID: PMC8657792. ↥
Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Fischman M, Foltin R, Abumrad NN, Gatley SJ, Logan J, Wong C, Gifford A, Ding YS, Hitzemann R, Pappas N (1999): Methylphenidate and cocaine have a similar in vivo potency to block dopamine transporters in the human brain. Life Sci. 1999;65(1):PL7-12. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(99)00225-8. PMID: 10403500. ↥
Masellis, Basile, Kennedy (2006): Neuropsychopharmacogenetics: ‘stimulating’ rationale therapy in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): pharmacogenetics of psychostimulants in ADHD. In: Gorwood, Hamon (editors): Psychopharmacogenetics. Boston: Springer US; 2006. p. 231 - 248. ↥ ↥
Mefford, Potter (1989): A neuroanatomical and biochemical basis for attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity in children: a defect in tonic adrenaline mediated inhibition of locus coeruleus stimulation; Med Hypotheses. 1989 May;29(1):33-42., zitiert nach Trott, Wirth (2000): die Pharmakotherapie der hyperkinetischen Störungen; in: Steinhausen (Herausgeber) hyperkinetischen Störungen bei Kindern, Jugendlichen und Erwachsenen, 2. Aufl., Seite 210 ↥
Richards T, Morandini HAE, Rao P (2025): Effect of methylphenidate exposure on glutamate and glutamate-related metabolites in patients with ADHD: a systematic review. J Psychiatr Res. 2025 Sep;189:236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.06.004. PMID: 40532563. REVIEW ↥
Bakhshi S, Tehrani-Doost M, Batouli SAH (2023): Fronto-Cerebellar Neurometabolite Alterations After Methylphenidate in Children and Adolescents With ADHD: A Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study. J Atten Disord. 2023 Feb;27(4):410-422. doi: 10.1177/10870547221146238. PMID: 36635897. ↥
Wiguna T, Guerrero AP, Wibisono S, Sastroasmoro S (2012): Effect of 12-week administration of 20-mg long-acting methylphenidate on Glu/Cr, NAA/Cr, Cho/Cr, and mI/Cr ratios in the prefrontal cortices of school-age children in Indonesia: a study using 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Clin Neuropharmacol. 2012 Mar-Apr;35(2):81-5. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0b013e3182452572. PMID: 22318191. ↥
Husarova V, Bittsansky M, Ondrejka I, Dobrota D (2014): Prefrontal grey and white matter neurometabolite changes after atomoxetine and methylphenidate in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a (1)H magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Psychiatry Res. 2014 Apr 30;222(1-2):75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.03.003. PMID: 24679996. ↥
Hammerness P, Biederman J, Petty C, Henin A, Moore CM (2012): Brain biochemical effects of methylphenidate treatment using proton magnetic spectroscopy in youth with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a controlled pilot study. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2012 Jan;18(1):34-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00226.x. PMID: 21143432; PMCID: PMC4084790. ↥
Zhang CL, Feng ZJ, Liu Y, Ji XH, Peng JY, Zhang XH, Zhen XC, Li BM (2012): Methylphenidate enhances NMDA-receptor response in medial prefrontal cortex via sigma-1 receptor: a novel mechanism for methylphenidate action. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051910. PMID: 23284812; PMCID: PMC3527396. ↥
Di Miceli M, Gronier B (2015): Psychostimulants and atomoxetine alter the electrophysiological activity of prefrontal cortex neurons, interaction with catecholamine and glutamate NMDA receptors. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Jun;232(12):2191-205. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3849-y. PMID: 25572531. ↥
Urban KR, Li YC, Gao WJ (2013): Treatment with a clinically-relevant dose of methylphenidate alters NMDA receptor composition and synaptic plasticity in the juvenile rat prefrontal cortex. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2013 Mar;101:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.01.004. PMID: 23333502; PMCID: PMC3602399. ↥
Jalloh K, Roeder N, Hamilton J, Delis F, Hadjiargyrou M, Komatsu D, Thanos PK (2021): Chronic oral methylphenidate treatment in adolescent rats promotes dose-dependent effects on NMDA receptor binding. Life Sci. 2021 Jan 1;264:118708. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118708. PMID: 33186568. ↥
Prieto-Gómez B, Vázquez-Alvarez AM, Martínez-Peña JL, Reyes-Vázquez C, Yang PB, Dafny N (2005): Methylphenidate and amphetamine modulate differently the NMDA and AMPA glutamatergic transmission of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area. Life Sci. 2005 Jun 24;77(6):635-49. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.10.076. PMID: 15921995. ↥
Zhang DD, Zhang YQ, Zhang XH (2018): Prefrontal AMPA receptors are involved in the effect of methylphenidate on response inhibition in rats. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2018 Apr;39(4):607-615. doi: 10.1038/aps.2017.138. PMID: 29265108; PMCID: PMC5888683. ↥
Miller EM, Quintero JE, Pomerleau F, Huettl P, Gerhardt GA, Glaser PEA (2019): Chronic Methylphenidate Alters Tonic and Phasic Glutamate Signaling in the Frontal Cortex of a Freely-Moving Rat Model of ADHD. Neurochem Res. 2019 Jan;44(1):89-101. doi: 10.1007/s11064-018-2483-1. PMID: 29397534. ↥
Schmitz F, Pierozan P, Rodrigues AF, Biasibetti H, Coelho DM, Mussulini BH, Pereira MS, Parisi MM, Barbé-Tuana F, de Oliveira DL, Vargas CR, Wyse AT (2016): Chronic Treatment with a Clinically Relevant Dose of Methylphenidate Increases Glutamate Levels in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Impairs Glutamatergic Homeostasis in Prefrontal Cortex of Juvenile Rats. Mol Neurobiol. 2016 May;53(4):2384-96. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9219-x. PMID: 26001762. ↥
Chen, Yuan, Sun, Song, Lu, Ni, Han (2019): Metabolomics study of the prefrontal cortex in a rat model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder reveals the association between cholesterol metabolism disorder and hyperactive behavior. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019 Dec 18. pii: S0006-291X(19)32336-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.12.016. ↥
Budziszewska, Basta-Kaim, Kubera, Lasoń (2010); [Immunological and endocrinological pattern in ADHD etiopathogenesis]. Przeglad Lekarski [01 Jan 2010, 67(11):1200-1204], PMID:21442976 ↥ ↥
Garre-Morata L, de Haro T, Villén RG, Fernández-López ML, Escames G, Molina-Carballo A, Acuña-Castroviejo D (2024): Changes in Cortisol and in Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress Indicators after ADHD Treatment. Antioxidants (Basel). 2024 Jan 12;13(1):92. doi: 10.3390/antiox13010092. PMID: 38247516; PMCID: PMC10812591. ↥ ↥
van Ruitenbeek, Quaedflieg, Hernaus, Hartogsveld, Smeets (2021): Dopaminergic and noradrenergic modulation of stress-induced alterations in brain activation associated with goal-directed behaviour. J Psychopharmacol. 2021 Sep 14:2698811211044679. doi: 10.1177/02698811211044679. PMID: 34519561. ↥
Wang LJ, Huang YS, Hsiao CC, Chen CK (2017): The Trend in Morning Levels of Salivary Cortisol in Children With ADHD During 6 Months of Methylphenidate Treatment. J Atten Disord. 2017 Feb;21(3):254-261. doi: 10.1177/1087054712466139. PMID: 23223012. ↥
Isaksson J, Hogmark Å, Nilsson KW, Lindblad F (2013): Effects of stimulants and atomoxetine on cortisol levels in children with ADHD. Psychiatry Res. 2013 Oct 30;209(3):740-1. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.06.011. PMID: 23850434. ↥
Aguado-Rivas R, Checa-Ros A, Fernández-López L, Tortosa-Pinto P, González-Villén R, Contreras-Chova F, Fernández-Ibañez A, Molina-Carballo A (2026): Steroid/thyroid hormones and inflammatory markers in adolescents with ADHD: comparisons with healthy controls and modifications by methylphenidate. Psychiatry Res. 2026 Jun;360:117111. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2026.117111. PMID: 41880936. ↥ ↥
Dolder PC, Müller F, Schmid Y, Borgwardt SJ, Liechti ME (2018): Direct comparison of the acute subjective, emotional, autonomic, and endocrine effects of MDMA, methylphenidate, and modafinil in healthy subjects. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Feb;235(2):467-479. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4650-5. PMID: 28551715; PMCID: PMC5813072. ↥ ↥
Lee MS, Yang JW, Ko YH, Han C, Kim SH, Lee MS, Joe SH, Jung IK (2008): Effects of methylphenidate and bupropion on DHEA-S and cortisol plasma levels in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2008 Jun;39(2):201-9. doi: 10.1007/s10578-007-0081-6. PMID: 17763937. ↥ ↥
Wang LJ, Wu CC, Lee SY, Tsai YF (2014): Salivary neurosteroid levels and behavioural profiles of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder during six months of methylphenidate treatment. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2014 Aug;24(6):336-40. doi: 10.1089/cap.2013.0122. PMID: 24956271. ↥ ↥
Negrao BL, Bipath P, van der Westhuizen D, Viljoen M (2011): Autonomic correlates at rest and during evoked attention in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and effects of methylphenidate. Neuropsychobiology. 2011;63(2):82-91. doi: 10.1159/000317548. PMID: 21178382. ↥
Negrao, Crafford, Viljoen (2009): The effect of sympathomimetic medication on cardiovascular functioning of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2009;20(5):296-9 ↥
Hammerness, Wilens, Mick, Spencer, Doyle, McCreary, Becker, Biederman (2009): Cardiovascular effects of longer-term, high-dose OROS methylphenidate in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Pediatr. 2009;155(1):84-9, 89.e1 ↥
Vetter, Elia, Erickson, Berger, Blum, Uzark, Webb (2008): Cardiovascular Monitoring of Children and Adolescents With Heart Disease Receiving Medications for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young Congenital Cardiac Defects Committee and the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Circulation. 2008;117:2407-23. ↥
Gianini SHS, Porto AA, Raimundo RD, de Souza IS, Garner DM, Valenti VE (2026): Effect of Methylphenidate on Heart Rate Variability in Children and Adolescents With ADHD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2026 Jul 01:10783903261456725. doi: 10.1177/10783903261456725. PMID: 42383361. METASTUDY ↥
Buchhorn R, Conzelmann A, Willaschek C, Störk D, Taurines R, Renner TJ (2012): Heart rate variability and methylphenidate in children with ADHD. Atten Defic Hyperact Disord. 2012 Jun;4(2):85-91. doi: 10.1007/s12402-012-0072-8. PMID: 22328340. ↥ ↥
Buchhorn R, Müller C, Willaschek C, Norozi K (2012): How to predict the impact of methylphenidate on cardiovascular risk in children with attention deficit disorder: methylphenidate improves autonomic dysfunction in children with ADHD. ISRN Pharmacol. 2012;2012:170935. doi: 10.5402/2012/170935. PMID: 22530135; PMCID: PMC3316982. ↥
Ozdemir R, Tanır Y, Demir BB, Yılmaz S, Geçkalan Soysal D, Karadeniz C (2024): The effect of long-term use of methylphenidate on cardiac autonomic functions and ventricular arrhythmogenesis: a prospective case-control study. Cardiol Young. 2024 Jan;34(1):32-36. doi: 10.1017/S1047951123001038. PMID: 37138525. ↥
Kim HJ, Yang J, Lee MS (2015): Changes of Heart Rate Variability during Methylphenidate Treatment in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Children: A 12-Week Prospective Study. Yonsei Med J. 2015 Sep;56(5):1365-71. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.5.1365. PMID: 26256981; PMCID: PMC4541668. ↥
Morris SSJ, Musser ED, Tenenbaum RB, Ward AR, Raiker JS, Coles EK (2022): Methylphenidate Improves Autonomic Functioning among Youth with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2022 May;50(5):591-603. doi: 10.1007/s10802-021-00870-5. PMID: 34613513; PMCID: PMC8983789. ↥ ↥
Conzelmann A, Gerdes AB, Mucha RF, Weyers P, Lesch KP, Bähne CG, Fallgatter AJ, Renner TJ, Warnke A, Romanos M, Pauli P (2014): Autonomic hypoactivity in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and the influence of methylphenidate. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;15(1):56-65. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2013.829584. PMID: 24410179. ↥
Wainstein G, Rojas-Líbano D, Crossley NA, Carrasco X, Aboitiz F, Ossandón T (2017): Pupil Size Tracks Attentional Performance In Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 15;7(1):8228. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08246-w. PMID: 28811624; PMCID: PMC5557799. ↥
Groen Y, Mulder LJ, Wijers AA, Minderaa RB, Althaus M (2009): Methylphenidate improves diminished error and feedback sensitivity in ADHD: An evoked heart rate analysis. Biol Psychol. 2009 Sep;82(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.05.004. PMID: 19464338. ↥
Wang LJ, Chou MC, Chou WJ, Lee MJ, Lin PY, Lee SY, Lee YH (2017): Does Methylphenidate Reduce Testosterone Levels in Humans? A Prospective Study in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017 Mar 01;20(3):219-227. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyw101. PMID: 27816940; PMCID: PMC5408967. ↥
Wang LJ, Huang YH, Chou WJ, Lee SY, Tsai CS, Lee MJ, Chou MC (2021): Potential disturbance of methylphenidate of gonadal hormones or pubescent development in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A twelve-month follow-up study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 08;108:110181. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110181. PMID: 33227299. ↥
Molina-Carballo, Cubero-Millán, Fernández-López, Checa-Ros, Machado-Casas, Jerez-Calero, Blanca-Jover, Cantarero-Malagón, Uberos, Muñoz-Hoyos (2021): Methylphenidate ameliorates the homeostatic balance between levels of kynurenines in ADHD children. Psychiatry Res. 2021 Jun 17;303:114060. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114060. PMID: 34175711. n = 179 ↥
Trott, Wirth (2000): die Pharmakotherapie der hyperkinetischen Störungen; in: Steinhausen (Herausgeber) hyperkinetischen Störungen bei Kindern, Jugendlichen und Erwachsenen, 2. Aufl., Seite 211 ↥ ↥
Sezen H, Kandemir H, Savik E, Basmacı Kandemir S, Kilicaslan F, Bilinc H, Aksoy N (2016): Increased oxidative stress in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Redox Rep. 2016 Nov;21(6):248-53. doi: 10.1080/13510002.2015.1116729. PMID: 26886057; PMCID: PMC6837712. ↥
Kul M, Unal F, Kandemir H, Sarkarati B, Kilinc K, Kandemir SB (2015): Evaluation of Oxidative Metabolism in Child and Adolescent Patients with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Psychiatry Investig. 2015 Jul;12(3):361-6. doi: 10.4306/pi.2015.12.3.361. PMID: 26207130; PMCID: PMC4504919. ↥
Gomes KM, Inácio CG, Valvassori SS, Réus GZ, Boeck CR, Dal-Pizzol F, Quevedo J (2009): Superoxide production after acute and chronic treatment with methylphenidate in young and adult rats. Neurosci Lett. 2009 Nov 6;465(1):95-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.08.060. PMID: 19716398. ↥ ↥
Sanches ES, Leitão RA, Baptista FI, Mota SI, Caldeira MV, Oliveira PJ, Ambrósio AF, Fernandes R, Silva AP (2025): Methylphenidate triggers retinal oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction under physiological conditions but has beneficial effects in inflammatory settings. Neuropharmacology. 2025 Nov 15;279:110623. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2025.110623. PMID: 40752585. ↥ ↥
Novo JP, Muga M, Lourenço T, Sanches ES, Leitão RA, Silva AP (2023): Dichotomous effect of methylphenidate on microglia and astrocytes: Insights from in vitro and animal studies. Toxicol Lett. 2023 Nov 01;389:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2023.10.008. PMID: 37844808. ↥ ↥
Altunkılıc EF, Alnak A, Karacetın G, Eroglu Iclı H, Kayan Ocakoglu B, Gurel Fıcıcıoglu IE (2026): The Effect of Methylphenidate Treatment on Oxidative Stress Levels in Children Diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: An Observational Study. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2026 May;36(4):200-209. doi: 10.1177/10445463261436792. PMID: 41873451. ↥
Sinningen K, Emons B, Böhme P, Juckel G, Hanusch B, Beckmann B, Tsikas D, Lücke T (2023): l-Arginine/nitric oxide pathway and oxidative stress in adults with ADHD: Effects of methylphenidate treatment. Nitric Oxide. 2023 Sep 01;138-139:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2023.06.006. PMID: 37392928. ↥
Comim CM, Gomes KM, Réus GZ, Petronilho F, Ferreira GK, Streck EL, Dal-Pizzol F, Quevedo J (2014): Methylphenidate treatment causes oxidative stress and alters energetic metabolism in an animal model of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2014 Apr;26(2):96-103. doi: 10.1017/neu.2013.35. PMID: 24855887. ↥
Oakes HV, Ketchem S, Hall AN, Ensley T, Archibald KM, Pond BB (2019): Chronic methylphenidate induces increased quinone production and subsequent depletion of the antioxidant glutathione in the striatum. Pharmacol Rep. 2019 Dec;71(6):1289-1292. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2019.08.003. PMID: 31693968. ↥
Foschiera LN, Schmitz F, Wyse ATS (2022): Evidence of methylphenidate effect on mitochondria, redox homeostasis, and inflammatory aspects: Insights from animal studies. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 08;116:110518. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110518. PMID: 35092763. REVIEW ↥ ↥
Jîtcă G, Mehelean IE, Maier AN, Jîtcă CM (2025): Methylphenidate and Its Impact on Redox Balance and Behavior. J Xenobiot. 2025 Sep 30;15(5). doi: 10.3390/jox15050157. PMID: 41149743; PMCID: PMC12565610. REVIEW ↥
Ouadih-Moran M, Muñoz-Hoyos A, D’Marco L, Molina-Carballo A, Seiquer I, Checa-Ros A (2023): Is S100B Involved in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)? Comparisons with Controls and Changes Following a Triple Therapy Containing Methylphenidate, Melatonin and ω-3 PUFAs. Nutrients. 2023 Jan 31;15(3):712. doi: 10.3390/nu15030712. PMID: 36771418. ↥
Carias E, Hamilton J, Robison LS, Delis F, Eiden R, Quattrin T, Hadjiargyrou M, Komatsu D, Thanos PK (2018): Chronic oral methylphenidate treatment increases microglial activation in rats. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2018 Dec;125(12):1867-1875. doi: 10.1007/s00702-018-1931-z. PMID: 30238340; PMCID: PMC6526704. ↥
Pereira-Sanchez V, Franco AR, Vieira D, de Castro-Manglano P, Soutullo C, Milham MP, Castellanos FX (2021): Systematic Review: Medication Effects on Brain Intrinsic Functional Connectivity in Patients With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;60(2):222-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.10.013. PMID: 33137412. REVIEW ↥
Parlatini V, Bellato A, Murphy D, Cortese S (2024): From neurons to brain networks, pharmacodynamics of stimulant medication for ADHD. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Sep;164:105841. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105841. PMID: 39098738. REVIEW ↥
Zimmer L (2017): Contribution of Clinical Neuroimaging to the Understanding of the Pharmacology of Methylphenidate. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Jul;38(7):608-620. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2017.04.001. PMID: 28450072. REVIEW ↥
Markovska-Simoska, Pop-Jordanova, Pop-Jordanov (2019): Inter- and Intra-Hemispheric EEG Coherence Study in Adults with Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2018 Dec 1;39(2-3):5-19. doi: 10.2478/prilozi-2018-0037. ↥
Nugiel T, Fogleman ND, Sheridan MA, Cohen JR (2025): Methylphenidate stabilizes dynamic brain network organization during tasks probing attention and reward processing in stimulant-naïve children with ADHD. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Jan 28:2025.01.27.25321175. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.27.25321175. PMID: 39974117; PMCID: PMC11838951. ↥
Rubinson, Horowitz, Naim-Feil, Gothelf, Moses, Levit-Binnun (2019): EEG functional networks reveal global effects of Methylphenidate in youth with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Brain Connect. 2019 Mar 28. doi: 10.1089/brain.2018.0630. ↥
Silk TJ, Malpas C, Vance A, Bellgrove MA (2017): The effect of single-dose methylphenidate on resting-state network functional connectivity in ADHD. Brain Imaging Behav. 2017 Oct;11(5):1422-1431. doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9620-8. PMID: 27734305. ↥
An L, Cao XH, Cao QJ, Sun L, Yang L, Zou QH, Katya R, Zang YF, Wang YF (2013): Methylphenidate normalizes resting-state brain dysfunction in boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Jun;38(7):1287-95. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.27. PMID: 23340519; PMCID: PMC3656372. ↥
Rubia K, Halari R, Cubillo A, Mohammad AM, Brammer M, Taylor E (2009): Methylphenidate normalises activation and functional connectivity deficits in attention and motivation networks in medication-naïve children with ADHD during a rewarded continuous performance task. Neuropharmacology. 2009 Dec;57(7-8):640-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.08.013. PMID: 19715709. ↥
Kowalczyk OS, Cubillo AI, Criaud M, Giampietro V, O’Daly OG, Mehta MA, Rubia K (2023): Single-dose effects of methylphenidate and atomoxetine on functional connectivity during an n-back task in boys with ADHD. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2023 Oct;240(10):2045-2060. doi: 10.1007/s00213-023-06422-7. PMID: 37500785; PMCID: PMC10506949. ↥
Henry TR, Fogleman ND, Nugiel T, Cohen JR (2022): Effect of methylphenidate on functional controllability: a preliminary study in medication-naïve children with ADHD. Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 17;12(1):518. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02283-4. PMID: 36528602; PMCID: PMC9759578. ↥
Kaiser A, Broeder C, Cohen JR, Douw L, Reneman L, Schrantee A (2022): Effects of a single-dose methylphenidate challenge on resting-state functional connectivity in stimulant-treatment naive children and adults with ADHD. Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Oct 15;43(15):4664-4675. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25981. PMID: 35781371; PMCID: PMC9491277. ↥
Yoo JH, Kim D, Choi J, Jeong B (2018): Treatment effect of methylphenidate on intrinsic functional brain network in medication-naïve ADHD children: A multivariate analysis. Brain Imaging Behav. 2018 Apr;12(2):518-531. doi: 10.1007/s11682-017-9713-z. PMID: 28417219. ↥
Vansina E, Douw L, Kaiser A, van der Pal Z, Boucherie DE, De Vries TJ, Pattij T, Cohen JR, Hoekstra PJ, Reneman L, Schrantee A (2025): Effects of 4-Month Methylphenidate Treatment on Functional Connectivity in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Aug 29:2025.08.27.25334547. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.27.25334547. PMID: 40909826; PMCID: PMC12407672. ↥ ↥
Kaminski A, Xie H, Hawkins B, Vaidya CJ (2024): Change in striatal functional connectivity networks across 2 years due to stimulant exposure in childhood ADHD: results from the ABCD sample. Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 6;14(1):463. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03165-7. Erratum in: Transl Psychiatry. 2026 Apr 29;16(1):237. doi: 10.1038/s41398-026-04051-0. PMID: 39505862; PMCID: PMC11541585. ↥
Mueller S, Costa A, Keeser D, Pogarell O, Berman A, Coates U, Reiser MF, Riedel M, Möller HJ, Ettinger U, Meindl T (2014): The effects of methylphenidate on whole brain intrinsic functional connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Nov;35(11):5379-88. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22557. PMID: 24862742; PMCID: PMC6869774. ↥
Gorka AX, Lago TR, Balderston N, Torrisi S, Fuchs B, Grillon C, Ernst M (2020): Intrinsic connections between thalamic sub-regions and the lateral prefrontal cortex are differentially impacted by acute methylphenidate. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Jun;237(6):1873-1883. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05505-z. PMID: 32307560; PMCID: PMC7437544. ↥
Farr OM, Zhang S, Hu S, Matuskey D, Abdelghany O, Malison RT, Li CS (2014): The effects of methylphenidate on resting-state striatal, thalamic and global functional connectivity in healthy adults. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Aug;17(8):1177-91. doi: 10.1017/S1461145714000674. PMID: 24825078; PMCID: PMC4506752. ↥
Rosenberg MD, Zhang S, Hsu WT, Scheinost D, Finn ES, Shen X, Constable RT, Li CS, Chun MM (2016): Methylphenidate Modulates Functional Network Connectivity to Enhance Attention. J Neurosci. 2016 Sep 14;36(37):9547-57. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1746-16.2016. PMID: 27629707; PMCID: PMC5039242. ↥
Manza P, Tomasi D, Vines L, Sotelo D, Yonga MV, Wang GJ, Volkow ND (2024): Brain connectivity changes to fast versus slow dopamine increases. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 May;49(6):924-932. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01803-8. PMID: 38326458; PMCID: PMC11039764. ↥
Tomasi D, Manza P, Yan W, Shokri-Kojori E, Demiral ŞB, Yonga MV, McPherson K, Biesecker C, Dennis E, Johnson A, Zhang R, Wang GJ, Volkow ND (2023): Examining the role of dopamine in methylphenidate’s effects on resting brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Dec 26;120(52):e2314596120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2314596120. PMID: 38109535; PMCID: PMC10756194. ↥
Kay BP, Wheelock MD, Siegel JS, Raut RV, Chauvin RJ, Metoki A, Rajesh A, Eck A, Pollaro J, Wang A, Suljic V, Adeyemo B, Baden NJ, Scheidter KM, Monk JS, Whiting FI, Ramirez-Perez N, Krimmel SR, Shinohara RT, Tervo-Clemmens B, Hermosillo RJM, Nelson SM, Hendrickson TJ, Madison T, Moore LA, Miranda-Domínguez Ó, Randolph A, Feczko E, Roland JL, Nicol GE, Laumann TO, Marek S, Gordon EM, Raichle ME, Barch DM, Fair DA, Dosenbach NUF (2025): Stimulant medications affect arousal and reward, not attention networks. Cell. 2025 Dec 24;188(26):7529-7546.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.11.039. PMID: 41448140; PMCID: PMC12834599. ↥
Pretzsch CM, Parlatini V, Murphy D (2025): Single-dose methylphenidate induces shift in functional connectivity associated with positive longer term clinical response in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 17;15(1):5794. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87204-3. PMID: 39962109; PMCID: PMC11833068. ↥
Ulrich M, Heckel K, Kölle M, Grön G (2022): Methylphenidate Differentially Affects Intrinsic Functional Connectivity of the Salience Network in Adult ADHD Treatment Responders and Non-Responders. Biology (Basel). 2022 Sep 06;11(9):1320. doi: 10.3390/biology11091320. PMID: 36138799; PMCID: PMC9495306. ↥
Norman LJ, Sudre G, Bouyssi-Kobar M, Sharp W, Shaw P (2021): A Longitudinal Study of Resting-State Connectivity and Response to Psychostimulant Treatment in ADHD. Am J Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 01;178(8):744-751. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.20091342. PMID: 34086483; PMCID: PMC8528221. ↥
Liddle, Hollis, Batty, Groom, Totman, Liotti, Scerif, Liddle (2011): Task-related default mode network modulation and inhibitory control in ADHD: effects of motivation and methylphenidate. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;52(7):761-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02333.x. ↥
Santos PH, Goncalves R, Pedroso S (2019): How does methylphenidate affect default mode network? A systematic review. Rev Neurol. 2019 May 16;68(10):417-425. doi: 10.33588/rn.6810.2018487. PMID: 31070233. REVIEW ↥
Battel L, Kieling RR, Kieling C, Anés M, Aurich NK, da Costa JC, Rohde LA, Franco AR (2016): Intrinsic Brain Connectivity Following Long-Term Treatment with Methylphenidate in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Aug;26(6):555-61. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0221. PMID: 27027427. ↥
Querne L, Fall S, Le Moing AG, Bourel-Ponchel E, Delignières A, Simonnot A, de Broca A, Gondry-Jouet C, Boucart M, Berquin P (2017): Effects of Methylphenidate on Default-Mode Network/Task-Positive Network Synchronization in Children With ADHD. J Atten Disord. 2017 Dec;21(14):1208-1220. doi: 10.1177/1087054713517542. PMID: 24420764. ↥
Picon FA, Sato JR, Anés M, Vedolin LM, Mazzola AA, Valentini BB, Cupertino RB, Karam RG, Victor MM, Breda V, Silva K, da Silva N, Bau CHD, Grevet EH, Rohde LAP (2020): Methylphenidate Alters Functional Connectivity of Default Mode Network in Drug-Naive Male Adults With ADHD. J Atten Disord. 2020 Feb;24(3):447-455. doi: 10.1177/1087054718816822. PMID: 30526190. ↥
Daood M, Magal N, Peled-Avron L, Nevat M, Ben-Hayun R, Aharon-Peretz J, Tomer R, Admon R (2024): Graph analysis uncovers an opposing impact of methylphenidate on connectivity patterns within default mode network sub-divisions. Behav Brain Funct. 2024 Jun 20;20(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12993-024-00242-1. PMID: 38902791; PMCID: PMC11191242. ↥
Mizuno Y, Cai W, Supekar K, Makita K, Takiguchi S, Silk TJ, Tomoda A, Menon V (2022): Methylphenidate Enhances Spontaneous Fluctuations in Reward and Cognitive Control Networks in Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2022 Oct 23:S2451-9022(22)00247-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.10.001. PMID: 36717325. ↥
Ramaekers JG, Evers EA, Theunissen EL, Kuypers KP, Goulas A, Stiers P (2013): Methylphenidate reduces functional connectivity of nucleus accumbens in brain reward circuit. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Sep;229(2):219-26. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3105-x. PMID: 23604336. ↥
Mizuno K, Yoneda T, Komi M, Hirai T, Watanabe Y, Tomoda A (2013): Osmotic release oral system-methylphenidate improves neural activity during low reward processing in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuroimage Clin. 2013;2:366-76. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.03.004. PMID: 24179790; PMCID: PMC3777787. ↥
Rubinson, Horowitz, Naim-Feil, Gothelf, Levit-Binnun, Moses (2019): Effects of methylphenidate on the ERP amplitude in youth with ADHD: A double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over EEG study. PLoS One. 2019 May 31;14(5):e0217383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217383. eCollection 2019. ↥ ↥
Quinn DM, Earley C, Scarlat IM, Whelan R, McGrath J (2026): Electroencephalographic Signatures of Methylphenidate in ADHD: A Systematic Review and 10 Recommendations for Future Research. J Atten Disord. 2026 Sep 08. doi: 10.1177/10870547261483457. PMID: 42708537. REVIEW ↥ ↥
Peisch V, Rutter T, Wilkinson CL, Arnett AB (2021): Sensory processing and P300 event-related potential correlates of stimulant response in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A critical review. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Apr;132(4):953-966. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.01.015. PMID: 33677205; PMCID: PMC7981253. REVIEW ↥ ↥
C R Barroso B, Mendonça F, Mazer P, Prata C, Pinto JO (2025): Methylphenidate and P300 in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Psychophysiol. 2025 May;211:112553. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2025.112553. PMID: 40064448. METASTUDY, k = 13 bzw. 17 ↥ ↥
Winsberg BG, Javitt DC, Silipo GS (1997): Electrophysiological indices of information processing in methylphenidate responders. Biol Psychiatry. 1997 Sep 15;42(6):434-45. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(96)00429-5. PMID: 9285079. ↥
Aasen IE, Øgrim G, Kropotov J, Brunner JF (2018): Methylphenidate selectively modulates one sub-component of the no-go P3 in pediatric ADHD medication responders. Biol Psychol. 2018 Apr;134:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.02.011. PMID: 29476840. ↥
Janssen TW, Bink M, Geladé K, van Mourik R, Maras A, Oosterlaan J (2016): A randomized controlled trial into the effects of neurofeedback, methylphenidate, and physical activity on EEG power spectra in children with ADHD. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 May;57(5):633-44. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12517. PMID: 26748531. ↥ ↥ ↥
Skirrow C, McLoughlin G, Banaschewski T, Brandeis D, Kuntsi J, Asherson P (2015): Normalisation of frontal theta activity following methylphenidate treatment in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Jan;25(1):85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.09.015. PMID: 25435084. ↥
Michelini G, Lenartowicz A, Diaz-Fong JP, Bilder RM, McGough JJ, McCracken JT, Loo SK (2023): Methylphenidate, Guanfacine, and Combined Treatment Effects on Electroencephalography Correlates of Spatial Working Memory in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;62(1):37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.06.017. PMID: 35963558; PMCID: PMC10829974. ↥
Thomas BL, Viljoen M (2016): EEG Brain Wave Activity at Rest and during Evoked Attention in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Effects of Methylphenidate. Neuropsychobiology. 2016;73(1):16-22. doi: 10.1159/000441523. PMID: 26812442. ↥
Loo SK, Bilder RM, Cho AL, Sturm A, Cowen J, Walshaw P, Levitt J, Del’Homme M, Piacentini J, McGough JJ, McCracken JT (2016): Effects of d-Methylphenidate, Guanfacine, and Their Combination on Electroencephalogram Resting State Spectral Power in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;55(8):674-682.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.04.020. PMID: 27453081; PMCID: PMC5003618. ↥
Cooper RE, Skirrow C, Tye C, McLoughlin G, Rijsdijk F, Banaschweski T, Brandeis D, Kuntsi J, Asherson P (2014): The effect of methylphenidate on very low frequency electroencephalography oscillations in adult ADHD. Brain Cogn. 2014 Apr;86:82-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.02.001. PMID: 24594658. ↥
Jarczok TA, Haase R, Bluschke A, Thiemann U, Bender S (2019): Bereitschaftspotential and lateralized readiness potential in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: altered motor system activation and effects of methylphenidate. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Aug;29(8):960-970. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.05.003. PMID: 31280897. ↥
Wang A, Yang H, Yang Y, Yang J, Yang X, Wen Q, Wang Q, Liu H, Luo R (2025): Neural markers of methylphenidate response in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and the impact on executive function. Front Psychiatry. 2025;16:1475889. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1475889. PMID: 40182201; PMCID: PMC11966463. ↥
Loo SK, Hopfer C, Teale PD, Reite ML (2004): EEG correlates of methylphenidate response in ADHD: association with cognitive and behavioral measures. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;21(6):457-64. doi: 10.1097/01.wnp.0000150890.14421.9a. PMID: 15622134. ↥
Dupuy FE, Clarke AR, Barry RJ, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M (2008): EEG coherence in girls with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: stimulant effects in good responders. Int J Psychophysiol. 2008 Dec;70(3):151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.07.012. PMID: 18708101. ↥
Takahara Y, Ota T, Nakanishi Y, Ueda S, Jurica P, Struzik ZR, Nishitomi K, Iida J, Kishimoto T, Cichocki A, Hasegawa M, Ogawa K (2023): Exploration of electroencephalogram response to MPH treatment in ADHD patients. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2023 Jul;332:111631. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2023.111631. PMID: 37030146. ↥
Loo SK, Specter E, Smolen A, Hopfer C, Teale PD, Reite ML (2003): Functional effects of the DAT1 polymorphism on EEG measures in ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;42(8):986-93. doi: 10.1097/01.CHI.0000046890.27264.88. PMID: 12874502. ↥
Nakao, Radua, Rubia, Mataix-Cols (2011): Gray matter volume abnormalities in ADHD: voxel-based meta-analysis exploring the effects of age and stimulant medication. Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;168(11):1154-63. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020281. 14 Studien mit n = 722 ↥ ↥
Frodl, Skokauskas (2012): Meta-analysis of structural MRI studies in children and adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder indicates treatment effects. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2012 Feb;125(2):114-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01786.x. ↥ ↥ ↥
King, Floren, Kharas, Thomas, Dafny (2019): Glutaminergic signaling in the caudate nucleus is required for behavioral sensitization to methylphenidate. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2019 Sep;184:172737. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2019.172737. ↥
Teicher, Anderson, Polcari, Glod, Maas, Renshaw (2000): Functional deficits in basal ganglia of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder shown with functional magnetic resonance imaging relaxometry.Nat Med. 2000 Apr;6(4):470-3. ↥
Rubia, Alegria, Cubillo, Smith, Brammer, Radua (2014): Effects of stimulants on brain function in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Oct 15;76(8):616-28. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.10.016. 14 Studien mit n = 222 REVIEW ↥ ↥
Matochik JA, Nordahl TE, Gross M, Semple WE, King AC, Cohen RM, Zametkin AJ (1993): Effects of acute stimulant medication on cerebral metabolism in adults with hyperactivity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1993 Jun;8(4):377-86. doi: 10.1038/npp.1993.38. PMID: 8512624. ↥
Matochik, Liebenauer, King, Szymanski, Cohen, Zametkin (1994): Cerebral glucose metabolism in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder after chronic stimulant treatment. Am J Psychiatry 151: 658–664; Achtung, geringes N von 37; Vorsicht, geringe Stichprobe mit n = 19; zitiert nach Edel, Vollmoeller (2006): Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung bei Erwachsenen, Springer, Seite 10 ↥
Yan W, Demiral ŞB, Tomasi D, Zhang R, Manza P, Wang GJ, Volkow ND (2025): Methylphenidate promotes a frontoparietal-dominant brain state improving cognitive performance: a randomized trial. J Neurosci. 2025 Mar 18;45(17):e1693242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1693-24.2025. PMID: 40101961; PMCID: PMC12019111. ↥
Spencer, Brown, Seidman, Valera, Makris, Lomedico, Faraone, Biederman (2013) Effect of psychostimulants on brain structure and function in ADHD: a qualitative literature review of magnetic resonance imaging-based neuroimaging studies. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;74(9):902-17. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12r08287. REVIEW ↥
Venkataraman, Claussen, Kharas, Dafny (2020): The prefrontal cortex and the caudate nucleus respond conjointly to methylphenidate (Ritalin). Concomitant behavioral and neuronal recording study. Brain Res Bull. 2020 Jan 24;157:77-89. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.10.009. PMID: 31987926. ↥
van der Pal Z, Reneman L, Mutsaerts HJMM, Kaiser A, Bottelier MA, Geurts HM, Schrantee A (2025): Association between long-term stimulant treatment and the functional brain response to methylphenidate in adolescents and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2025 Dec 20;143:111545. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2025.111545. PMID: 41173167. ↥
Czerniak SM, Sikoglu EM, King JA, Kennedy DN, Mick E, Frazier J, Moore CM (2013): Areas of the brain modulated by single-dose methylphenidate treatment in youth with ADHD during task-based fMRI: a systematic review. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2013;21(3):151-62. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0b013e318293749e. PMID: 23660970; PMCID: PMC4103657. REVIEW ↥
Pan N, Ma T, Liu Y, Zhang S, Hu S, Shekara A, Cao H, Gong Q, Chen Y (2024): Overlapping and differential neuropharmacological mechanisms of stimulants and nonstimulants for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a comparative neuroimaging analysis. Psychol Med. 2024 Dec;54(16):4676-4690. doi: 10.1017/S003329172400285X. PMID: 39806554; PMCID: PMC11769909. METASTUDY, k = 28, N = 855 ↥ ↥
Hart H, Radua J, Nakao T, Mataix-Cols D, Rubia K (2013): Meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of inhibition and attention in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: exploring task-specific, stimulant medication, and age effects. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;70(2):185-98. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.277. PMID: 23247506. METASTUDY, k = 21 bzw. 13 Datensätze ↥
Rubia K, Halari R, Cubillo A, Smith AB, Mohammad AM, Brammer M, Taylor E (2011): Methylphenidate normalizes fronto-striatal underactivation during interference inhibition in medication-naïve boys with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011 Jul;36(8):1575-86. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.30. PMID: 21451498; PMCID: PMC3116801. ↥
Kowalczyk OS, Cubillo AI, Smith A, Barrett N, Giampietro V, Brammer M, Simmons A, Rubia K (2019): Methylphenidate and atomoxetine normalise fronto-parietal underactivation during sustained attention in ADHD adolescents. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Oct;29(10):1102-1116. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.07.139. PMID: 31358436. ↥
Monden Y, Dan H, Nagashima M, Dan I, Tsuzuki D, Kyutoku Y, Gunji Y, Yamagata T, Watanabe E, Momoi MY (2012): Right prefrontal activation as a neuro-functional biomarker for monitoring acute effects of methylphenidate in ADHD children: An fNIRS study. Neuroimage Clin. 2012;1(1):131-40. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2012.10.001. PMID: 24179746; PMCID: PMC3757725. ↥
Bottelier MA, Schrantee A, Ferguson B, Tamminga HGH, Bouziane C, Kooij JJS, de Ruiter MB, Reneman L (2017): Age-dependent effects of acute methylphenidate on amygdala reactivity in stimulant treatment-naive patients with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2017 Nov 30;269:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2017.09.009. PMID: 28938219. ↥
Schulz KP, Fan J, Bédard AC, Clerkin SM, Ivanov I, Tang CY, Halperin JM, Newcorn JH (2012): Common and unique therapeutic mechanisms of stimulant and nonstimulant treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;69(9):952-61. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.2053. PMID: 22945622; PMCID: PMC12858410. ↥
Shen F, Zhou H (2025): Effects of methylphenidate on children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a study using clinical and multimodal approaches including go/no-go task and functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Front Pharmacol. 2025;16:1726716. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1726716. PMID: 41446796; PMCID: PMC12723010. ↥
Kaiser A, Bottelier MA, de Ruiter MB, Solleveld MM, Tamminga HGH, Bouziane C, Geurts HM, Lindauer RJL, Kooij JJS, Lucassen PJ, Schrantee A, Reneman L (2021): Effects of prolonged methylphenidate treatment on amygdala reactivity and connectivity: a randomized controlled trial in stimulant treatment-naive, male participants with ADHD. Psychoradiology. 2021 Sep;1(3):152-163. doi: 10.1093/psyrad/kkab013. PMID: 38665807; PMCID: PMC10917223. ↥
Kronenberg G, Ende G, Alm B, Deuschle M, Heuser I, Colla M (2008): Increased NAA and reduced choline levels in the anterior cingulum following chronic methylphenidate. A spectroscopic test-retest study in adult ADHD. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008 Oct;258(7):446-50. doi: 10.1007/s00406-008-0810-2. PMID: 18330668. ↥
Ivanov I, Liu X, Clerkin S, Schulz K, Fan J, Friston K, London ED, Schwartz J, Newcorn JH (2014): Methylphenidate and brain activity in a reward/conflict paradigm: role of the insula in task performance. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Jun;24(6):897-906. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.01.017. PMID: 24491951. ↥
Marquand AF, De Simoni S, O’Daly OG, Williams SC, Mourão-Miranda J, Mehta MA (2011): Pattern classification of working memory networks reveals differential effects of methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and placebo in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011 May;36(6):1237-47. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.9. PMID: 21346736; PMCID: PMC3079849. ↥
Tremblay S, Pieper F, Sachs A, Joober R, Martinez-Trujillo J (2019): The Effects of Methylphenidate (Ritalin) on the Neurophysiology of the Monkey Caudal Prefrontal Cortex. eNeuro. 2019;6(1):ENEURO.0371-18.2018. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0371-18.2018. PMID: 30847388; PMCID: PMC6402537. ↥
Walhovd KB, Amlien I, Schrantee A, Rohani DA, Groote I, Bjørnerud A, Fjell AM, Reneman L (2020): Methylphenidate Effects on Cortical Thickness in Children and Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 May;41(5):758-765. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6560. PMID: 32414901; PMCID: PMC7228175. ↥
Wigal, Chappell, Palumbo, Lubaczewski, Ramaker, Abbas (2020): Diagnosis and Treatment Options for Preschoolers with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2020 Jan 20;10.1089/cap.2019.0116. doi: 10.1089/cap.2019.0116. PMID: 31967914. ↥
Sugaya LS, Salum GA, de Sousa Gurgel W, de Morais EM, Del Prette G, Pilatti CD, Dalmaso BB, Leibenluft E, Rohde LA, Polanczyk GV (2022): Efficacy and safety of methylphenidate and behavioural parent training for children aged 3-5 years with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and sham behavioural parent training-controlled trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022 Dec;6(12):845-856. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00279-6. PMID: 36306807; PMCID: PMC9731509. ↥ ↥ ↥
Chiu HJ, Sun CK, Cheng YS, Wang MY, Tzang RF, Lin FL, Cheng YC, Chung W (2023): Efficacy and tolerability of psychostimulants for symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in preschool children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 15;66(1):e24. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.11. PMID: 36788670; PMCID: PMC10044299. METASTUDY, k = 9, N = 544 ↥ ↥ ↥
Sugaya LS, Farhat LC, Califano P, Polanczyk GV (2023): Efficacy of stimulants for preschool attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JCPP Adv. 2023 Sep;3(3):e12146. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12146. PMID: 37720577; PMCID: PMC10501696. METASTUDY, k = 5, N = 489 ↥ ↥
Wigal SB, Gupta S, Greenhill L, Posner K, Lerner M, Steinhoff K, Wigal T, Kapelinski A, Martinez J, Modi NB, Stehli A, Swanson J (2007): Pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate in preschoolers with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2007 Apr;17(2):153-64. doi: 10.1089/cap.2007.0043. PMID: 17489710. ↥
Short EJ, Manos MJ, Findling RL, Schubel EA (2004): A prospective study of stimulant response in preschool children: insights from ROC analyses. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;43(3):251-9. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200403000-00005. PMID: 15076257. ↥
Ghuman JK, Riddle MA, Vitiello B, Greenhill LL, Chuang SZ, Wigal SB, Kollins SH, Abikoff HB, McCracken JT, Kastelic E, Scharko AM, McGough JJ, Murray DW, Evans L, Swanson JM, Wigal T, Posner K, Cunningham C, Davies M, Skrobala AM (2007): Comorbidity moderates response to methylphenidate in the Preschoolers with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Treatment Study (PATS). J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2007 Oct;17(5):563-80. doi: 10.1089/cap.2007.0071. PMID: 17979578. ↥
Treister R, Eisenberg E, Demeter N, Pud D (2015): Alterations in pain response are partially reversed by methylphenidate (Ritalin) in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Pain Pract. 2015 Jan;15(1):4-11. doi: 10.1111/papr.12129. PMID: 24134430. ↥
Pud D, Broitman E, Hameed O, Suzan E, Aviram J, Haddad M, Hadad S, Shemesh R, Eisenberg E (2017): Methylphenidate attenuates the response to cold pain but not to aversive auditory stimuli in healthy human: a double-blind randomized controlled study. Pain Rep. 2017 May;2(3):e593. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000593. PMID: 29392209; PMCID: PMC5741299. ↥
Bozkurt A, Balta S (2023): The effect of methylphenidate on pain perception thresholds in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2023 Oct 13;17(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13034-023-00667-y. PMID: 37833816; PMCID: PMC10576289. ↥
Wolff N, Rubia K, Knopf H, Hölling H, Martini J, Ehrlich S, Roessner V (2016): Reduced pain perception in children and adolescents with ADHD is normalized by methylphenidate. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2016;10:24. doi: 10.1186/s13034-016-0112-9. PMID: 27453723; PMCID: PMC4957360. ↥
Kaşak M, Günal Okumuş H, Çelik YS, Kırşan FZ, Öztürk Y, Efe A (2025): Novel hematologic ratios and systemic inflammation index in ADHD: effects of methylphenidate treatment. Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 16;16:1621767. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1621767. PMID: 40740259; PMCID: PMC12308500. ↥
Özkan S, Can F, Höbel A (2026): Serum GDF-15 Levels in Pediatric ADHD: Associations with Symptom Severity and Stimulant Exposure. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2026;22:622224. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S622224. PMID: 42472025; PMCID: PMC13380271. ↥
Ercan S, Yurtseven B, Başkan ÖM, Aydın E, Emer ME, Aydemir E, Ayaz F (2026): Methylphenidate modulates the ınflammatory response and PI3K signaling in macrophages. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2026 Apr;399(7):9665-9672. doi: 10.1007/s00210-026-05027-z. PMID: 41569312; PMCID: PMC13152962. ↥
Mattingly GW, Childress AC, Cutler AJ, Estrada J, Corliss M (2023): Serdexmethylphenidate/dexmethylphenidate effects on sleep in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 23;14:1193455. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1193455. PMID: 37426086; PMCID: PMC10327472. ↥
Chin WC, Huang YS, Chou YH, Wang CH, Chen KT, Hsu JF, Hsu SC (2018): Subjective and objective assessments of sleep problems in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and the effects of methylphenidate treatment. Biomed J. 2018 Dec;41(6):356-363. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2018.10.004. PMID: 30709577; PMCID: PMC6362263. ↥
Solleveld MM, Schrantee A, Baek HK, Bottelier MA, Tamminga HGH, Bouziane C, Stoffelsen R, Lucassen PJ, Van Someren EJW, Rijsman RM, Reneman L (2020): Effects of 16 Weeks of Methylphenidate Treatment on Actigraph-Assessed Sleep Measures in Medication-Naive Children With ADHD. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:82. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00082. PMID: 32184743; PMCID: PMC7058799. ↥
Becker SP, Froehlich TE, Epstein JN (2016): Effects of Methylphenidate on Sleep Functioning in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2016 Jun;37(5):395-404. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000285. PMID: 27011002; PMCID: PMC4887346. ↥
Sobanski E, Schredl M, Kettler N, Alm B (2008): Sleep in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) before and during treatment with methylphenidate: a controlled polysomnographic study. Sleep. 2008 Mar;31(3):375-81. doi: 10.1093/sleep/31.3.375. PMID: 18363314; PMCID: PMC2276739. ↥
Low AM, Vangkilde S, le Sommer J, Fagerlund B, Glenthøj B, Jepsen JRM, Habekost T (2023): Effects of methylphenidate on subjective sleep parameters in adults with ADHD: a prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded 6-week trial. Nord J Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;77(1):102-107. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2022.2080253. PMID: 35635014. ↥
Fredriksen M, Golparian N, Beiske K, Stavem K (2021): Impact of methylphenidate on sleep problems in adults with ADHD: a pilot polysomnography study. Nord J Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;75(3):234-238. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2020.1833984. PMID: 33100096. ↥
Pertermann, Bluschke, Roessner, Beste (2019): The Modulation of Neural Noise Underlies the Effectiveness of Methylphenidate Treatment in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019 Apr 3. pii: S2451-9022(19)30080-1. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.03.011. ↥ ↥
Edel, Vollmoeller (2006): Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung bei Erwachsenen, Springer, Seite 13 ↥
Wang, Li, Sawmiller, Fan, Ma, Tan, Ren, Li (2013): Chronic mild stress-induced changes of risk assessment behaviors in mice are prevented by chronic treatment with fluoxetine but not diazepam.Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2014 Jan;116:116-28. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2013.11.028. ↥
Pires, Pamplona, Pandolfo, Prediger, Takahashi (2010): Chronic caffeine treatment during prepubertal period confers long-term cognitive benefits in adult spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), an animal model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Behav Brain Res. 2010 Dec 20;215(1):39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.06.022. PMID: 20600342. ↥
Wiley MD, Poveromo LB, Antapasis J, Herrera CM, Bolaños Guzmán CA (2009): Kappa-opioid system regulates the long-lasting behavioral adaptations induced by early-life exposure to methylphenidate. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Apr;34(5):1339-50. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.188. PMID: 18923399; PMCID: PMC2656574. ↥
Bolaños CA, Willey MD, Maffeo ML, Powers KD, Kinka DW, Grausam KB, Henderson RP (2008): Antidepressant treatment can normalize adult behavioral deficits induced by early-life exposure to methylphenidate. Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Feb 1;63(3):309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.06.024. PMID: 17884021. ↥
Britton GB, Bethancourt JA (2009): Characterization of anxiety-related responses in male rats following prolonged exposure to therapeutic doses of oral methylphenidate. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009 Oct;93(4):451-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2009.06.007. PMID: 19540871. ↥
Bethancourt JA, Camarena ZZ, Britton GB (2009): Exposure to oral methylphenidate from adolescence through young adulthood produces transient effects on hippocampal-sensitive memory in rats. Behav Brain Res. 2009 Aug 24;202(1):50-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.03.015. PMID: 19447280. ↥
Adriani W, Canese R, Podo F, Laviola G (2007): 1H MRS-detectable metabolic brain changes and reduced impulsive behavior in adult rats exposed to methylphenidate during adolescence. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2007 Jan-Feb;29(1):116-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2006.11.010. PMID: 17196789. ↥ ↥
Adriani W, Leo D, Greco D, Rea M, di Porzio U, Laviola G, Perrone-Capano C (2006): Methylphenidate administration to adolescent rats determines plastic changes on reward-related behavior and striatal gene expression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006 Sep;31(9):1946-56. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300962. PMID: 16319916. ↥
Carlezon WA Jr, Mague SD, Andersen SL (2003): Enduring behavioral effects of early exposure to methylphenidate in rats. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Dec 15;54(12):1330-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.08.020. PMID: 14675796. ↥
Bolaños CA, Barrot M, Berton O, Wallace-Black D, Nestler EJ (2003): Methylphenidate treatment during pre- and periadolescence alters behavioral responses to emotional stimuli at adulthood. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Dec 15;54(12):1317-29. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00570-5. PMID: 14675795. ↥
Moffett JR, Ross B, Arun P, Madhavarao CN, Namboodiri AM (2007): N-Acetylaspartate in the CNS: from neurodiagnostics to neurobiology. Prog Neurobiol. 2007 Feb;81(2):89-131. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.12.003. PMID: 17275978; PMCID: PMC1919520. REVIEW ↥
Chen JG, Charles HC, Barboriak DP, Doraiswamy PM (2000): Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in Alzheimer’s disease: focus on N-acetylaspartate. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2000;176:20-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2000.00303.x. PMID: 11261801. REVIEW ↥
Shaw P, Sharp WS, Morrison M, Eckstrand K, Greenstein DK, Clasen LS, Evans AC, Rapoport JL (2009): Psychostimulant treatment and the developing cortex in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jan;166(1):58-63. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08050781. PMID: 18794206; PMCID: PMC2700349. ↥
Chang JC, Lin HY, Gau SS (2025): Age-dependent effects of cumulative methylphenidate exposure on brain structure and symptom amelioration in youth with ADHD: A longitudinal MRI study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 13;140:111429. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2025.111429. PMID: 40527386. ↥
Takahashi, Ohmiya, Honda, Ni (2018): The KCNH3 inhibitor ASP2905 shows potential in the treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 21;13(11):e0207750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207750. eCollection 2018. ↥
Vaidya, Austin, Kirkorian, Ridlehuber, Desmond, Glover, Gabrieli (1998): Selective effects of methylphenidate in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a functional magnetic resonance study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Nov 24;95(24):14494-9. ↥
Balcioglu A, Ren JQ, McCarthy D, Spencer TJ, Biederman J, Bhide PG (2009): Plasma and brain concentrations of oral therapeutic doses of methylphenidate and their impact on brain monoamine content in mice. Neuropharmacology. 2009 Dec;57(7-8):687-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.07.025. PMID: 19631228; PMCID: PMC2783341. ↥
Bystrowska B, Adamczyk P, Moniczewski A, Zaniewska M, Fuxe K, Filip M (2012): LC/MS/MS evaluation of cocaine and its metabolites in different brain areas, peripheral organs and plasma in cocaine self-administering rats. Pharmacol Rep. 2012;64(6):1337-49. doi: 10.1016/s1734-1140(12)70931-3. PMID: 23406744. ↥
Janowsky DS, Leichner P, Parker D, Judd L, Huey L, Clopton P (1978): Methylphenidate and serum prolactin in man. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1978 Jun 15;58(1):43-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00426788. PMID: 97718. ↥
Schmid Y, Hysek CM, Simmler LD, Crockett MJ, Quednow BB, Liechti ME (2014): Differential effects of MDMA and methylphenidate on social cognition. J Psychopharmacol. 2014 Sep;28(9):847-56. doi: 10.1177/0269881114542454. PMID: 25052243. ↥
Clemens JA, Fuller RW (1979): Differences in the effects of amphetamine and methylphenidate on brain dopamine turnover and serum prolactin concentration in reserpine-treated rats. Life Sci. 1979 May 28;24(22):2077-81. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(79)90081-x. PMID: 459703. ↥
Shaywitz BA, Shaywitz SE, Sebrechts MM, Anderson GM, Cohen DJ, Jatlow P, Young JG (1990): Growth hormone and prolactin response to methylphenidate in children with attention deficit disorder. Life Sci. 1990;46(9):625-33. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(90)90131-a. PMID: 2308471. ↥
Nemet D, Ben-Zaken S, Eliakim A (2024): The effect of methylphenidate on the dopamine and growth hormone response to exercise in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2024 Jun;76:101596. doi: 10.1016/j.ghir.2024.101596. PMID: 38820857. ↥
Lai KY, Li CJ, Tsai CS, Chou WJ, Huang WT, You HL, Lee SY, Wang LJ (2024): Appetite hormones, neuropsychological function and methylphenidate use in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2024 Dec;170:107169. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.107169. PMID: 39226626. ↥ ↥ ↥
Sahin S, Yuce M, Alacam H, Karabekiroglu K, Say GN, Salıs O (2014): Effect of methylphenidate treatment on appetite and levels of leptin, ghrelin, adiponectin, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in children and adolescents with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2014 Oct;18(4):280-7. doi: 10.3109/13651501.2014.940054. PMID: 24994482. ↥ ↥ ↥ ↥
de Lucca MS, Pimentel MEO, Raimundo CKO, Henriques BD, Moreira TR, Cardoso SA, de Miranda DM (2023): Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in children and adolescents before and after stimulant use a systematic review and metanalysis. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 13;125:110761. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2023.110761. PMID: 37044279. METASTUDY, k = 19 ↥
Cubero-Millán I, Ruiz-Ramos MJ, Molina-Carballo A, Martínez-Serrano S, Fernández-López L, Machado-Casas I, Tortosa-Pinto P, Ruiz-López A, Luna-Del-Castillo JD, Uberos J, Muñoz-Hoyos A (2017): BDNF concentrations and daily fluctuations differ among ADHD children and respond differently to methylphenidate with no relationship with depressive symptomatology. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Jan;234(2):267-279. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4460-1. PMID: 27807606. ↥
Cubero-Millán I, Molina-Carballo A, Machado-Casas I, Fernández-López L, Martínez-Serrano S, Tortosa-Pinto P, Ruiz-López A, Luna-del-Castillo JD, Uberos J, Muñoz-Hoyos A (2014): Methylphenidate ameliorates depressive comorbidity in ADHD children without any modification on differences in serum melatonin concentration between ADHD subtypes. Int J Mol Sci. 2014 Sep 25;15(9):17115-29. doi: 10.3390/ijms150917115. PMID: 25257531; PMCID: PMC4200748. ↥
van der Schaaf ME, Fallon SJ, Ter Huurne N, Buitelaar J, Cools R (2013): Working memory capacity predicts effects of methylphenidate on reversal learning. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Sep;38(10):2011-8. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.100. PMID: 23612436; PMCID: PMC3746683. ↥